标题
Nano(Q)SAR: Challenges, pitfalls and perspectives
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Nanotoxicology
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 636-642
出版商
Informa UK Limited
发表日期
2014-09-25
DOI
10.3109/17435390.2014.952698
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Nanoinformatics: Emerging Databases and Available Tools
- (2014) Suresh Panneerselvam et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES
- Nano-quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling using easily computable and interpretable descriptors for uptake of magnetofluorescent engineered nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells
- (2014) Supratik Kar et al. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
- Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting biological activity of diverse nanomaterials
- (2014) Kunwar P. Singh et al. RSC Advances
- QSAR as a random event: Modeling of nanoparticles uptake in PaCa2 cancer cells
- (2013) Andrey A. Toropov et al. CHEMOSPHERE
- Developing Descriptors To Predict Mechanical Properties of Nanotubes
- (2013) Tammie L. Borders et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Models for Ready Biodegradability of Chemicals
- (2013) Kamel Mansouri et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- A comparative study of submicron particle sizing platforms: Accuracy, precision and resolution analysis of polydisperse particle size distributions
- (2013) Will Anderson et al. JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
- Daphnia and fish toxicity of (benzo)triazoles: Validated QSAR models, and interspecies quantitative activity–activity modelling
- (2013) Stefano Cassani et al. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
- Using experimental data of Escherichia coli to develop a QSAR model for predicting the photo-induced cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles
- (2013) Kavitha Pathakoti et al. JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY B-BIOLOGY
- A Large-Scale Empirical Evaluation of Cross-Validation and External Test Set Validation in (Q)SAR
- (2013) Martin Gütlein et al. Molecular Informatics
- Development of structure–activity relationship for metal oxide nanoparticles
- (2013) Rong Liu et al. Nanoscale
- Principal component and causal analysis of structural and acutein vitrotoxicity data for nanoparticles
- (2013) Xue Z. Wang et al. Nanotoxicology
- Nanoparticle dispersity in toxicology
- (2013) Mohammed Baalousha et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- We need answers
- (2013) Ratna Tantra et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Broaden the discussion
- (2013) Bengt Fadeel et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- A tiered approach
- (2013) Maxine J. McCall et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: General considerations
- (2013) Grace Patlewicz et al. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
- Evaluation criteria for the quality of published experimental data on nanomaterials and their usefulness for QSAR modelling
- (2013) L. Lubinski et al. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
- Nano-SAR Development for Bioactivity of Nanoparticles with Considerations of Decision Boundaries
- (2013) Rong Liu et al. Small
- Toxicity of nanomaterials: Availability and suitability of data for the development of in silico models
- (2013) Andrea-Nicole Richarz et al. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
- Advancing risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: Application of computational approaches
- (2012) Agnieszka Gajewicz et al. ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
- Use and perceived benefits and barriers of QSAR models for REACH: findings from a questionnaire to stakeholders
- (2012) Claire Mays et al. Chemistry Central Journal
- Engineered nanomaterial risk. Lessons learnt from completed nanotoxicology studies: potential solutions to current and future challenges
- (2012) Helinor Johnston et al. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY
- Modeling the Cellular Uptake of Magnetofluorescent Nanoparticles in Pancreatic Cancer Cells: A Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship Study
- (2012) Mehdi Ghorbanzadeh et al. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
- Dependence of QSAR Models on the Selection of Trial Descriptor Sets: A Demonstration Using Nanotoxicity Endpoints of Decorated Nanotubes
- (2012) Chi-Yu Shao et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Modeling Biological Activities of Nanoparticles
- (2012) V. Chandana Epa et al. NANO LETTERS
- Non-invasive determination of cellular oxygen consumption as novel cytotoxicity assay for nanomaterials
- (2012) Andrea Neumeyer et al. Nanotoxicology
- Applying quantitative structure–activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potential
- (2012) David A. Winkler et al. TOXICOLOGY
- Quantitative Nanostructure–Activity Relationship modelling of nanoparticles
- (2012) Yi Ting Chau et al. RSC Advances
- Exploring Quantitative Nanostructure-Activity Relationships (QNAR) Modeling as a Tool for Predicting Biological Effects of Manufactured Nanoparticles
- (2011) Denis Fourches et al. COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY & HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING
- Improving the Interferences of Methyl Thiazolyl Tetrazolium and IL-8 Assays in Assessing the Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles
- (2011) I-Lun Hsiao et al. JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
- NIST gold nanoparticle reference materials do not induce oxidative DNA damage
- (2011) Bryant C. Nelson et al. Nanotoxicology
- Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles
- (2011) Tomasz Puzyn et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Assessing the reproductive toxicity of some (con)azole compounds using a structure–activity relationship approach
- (2011) M. Bolčič–Tavčar et al. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
- Non-testing approaches under REACH – help or hindrance? Perspectives from a practitioner within industry
- (2011) G. Patlewicz et al. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
- Exploring an ecotoxicity database with the OECD (Q)SAR Toolbox and DRAGON descriptors in order to prioritise testing on algae, daphnids, and fish
- (2011) Cleo Tebby et al. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
- Classification NanoSAR Development for Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
- (2011) Rong Liu et al. Small
- QSAR modeling of nanomaterials
- (2011) Enrico Burello et al. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
- Quantitative Nanostructure−Activity Relationship Modeling
- (2010) Denis Fourches et al. ACS Nano
- Use of a (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationship [(Q)Sar] Model to Predict the Toxicity of Naphthenic Acids
- (2010) Richard A. Frank et al. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES
- Endotoxin contamination of engineered nanomaterials
- (2010) R. Keith Esch et al. Nanotoxicology
- A theoretical framework for predicting the oxidative stress potential of oxide nanoparticles
- (2010) Enrico Burello et al. Nanotoxicology
- Molecular Determinants of Juvenile Hormone Action as Revealed by 3D QSAR Analysis in Drosophila
- (2009) Denisa Liszeková et al. PLoS One
- Mechanism-based categorization of aromatase inhibitors: a potential discovery and screening tool
- (2009) P.I. Petkov et al. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
- Nanomaterials for environmental studies: Classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation
- (2009) Vicki Stone et al. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
- Toward the Development of âNano-QSARsâ: Advances and Challenges
- (2009) Tomasz Puzyn et al. Small
- Robust Cross-Validation of Linear Regression QSAR Models
- (2008) Dmitry A. Konovalov et al. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- The Use of (Q)SAR Methods in the Context of REACH
- (2008) Uwe Lahl et al. TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
- Predictivity and Reliability of QSAR Models: The Case of Mutagens and Carcinogens
- (2008) Romualdo Benigni et al. TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
- Structure–activity relationship analysis tools: Validation and applicability in predicting carcinogens
- (2007) J. Mayer et al. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started