4.2 Article

Improving the Interferences of Methyl Thiazolyl Tetrazolium and IL-8 Assays in Assessing the Cytotoxicity of Nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 5228-5233

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2011.4132

关键词

MTT; IL-8; A549 Cells; Absorption Effect; Protein Adsorption

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) assays are common colorimetric methods to measure mitochondrial activity and drug induced pro-inflammatory factors. However, many reports have described how MTT absorbance and cytokine adsorption could limit their applicability in evaluating the cytotoxicity of nanomaterials. In this study, we used an acid-containing isopropanol complex as a substitute for dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solvent to dissolve MTT formazan, which was expected to diminish the absorbance of nano-ZnO at 570 nm where maximum absorbance for the MTT formazan was detected. In addition, we used a serum-containing medium to prevent the possible effects of IL-8 protein adsorption in the nano-ZnO and nano-TiO2. The results showed that the modified method by using acid-containing isopropanol step in MTT assay, nano-ZnO exposed to human lung epithelial cells had the lowest cell viability (from 12.5 to 50 mu g mL(-1)) and EC50 value (8.4 mu g mL(-1)) comparing with the conventional MTT protocol or adding phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to wash cells. The reason for this was the acid-containing isopropanol completely dissolved nano-ZnO with no additional absorbance when compared to the background solvent at 570 nm. On the other hand, the IL-8 protein had a marked influence on the adsorption of nano-TiO2 in the serum-free medium. While only at 100 mu g mL(-1) of nano-ZnO, an influence on the adsorption of IL-8 was observed. This could be attributed to the different charges on the surface of nanomaterials. This problem could be overcome through the addition of fetal bovine serum (FBS) to the medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据