4.7 Article

Traditional foods from the Black Sea region as a potential source of minerals

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 93, 期 14, 页码 3535-3544

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6164

关键词

minerals; traditional foods; food composition data; micronutrients; Black Sea area countries; BaSeFood

资金

  1. European Community [227118]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/F/00042646, BBS/E/F/00042541] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/00042541, BBS/E/F/00042646] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDIn the past few years, minerals have assumed great importance in public health. As a consequence, considerable research has been carried out to better understand their physiological role and the health consequences of mineral-deficient diets, to establish criteria for defining the degree of public health severity of malnutrition, and to develop prevention and control strategies. In most countries, there is limited information on the mineral content of traditional foods, and consequently it is very difficult to estimate mineral intake across these countries. RESULTSTen minerals were quantified in 33 traditional foods from Black Sea area countries. Our results indicate a considerable variability among the analysed traditional foods; nevertheless, the most abundant components were sodium (ranging from 40.0 to 619 mg 100 g(-1), for kvass southern and herbal dish, respectively), potassium (varied between 45.5 mg 100 g(-1) for millet ale and 938 mg 100 g(-1) for roasted sunflower seeds), and phosphorus (22.2 mg 100 g(-1) and 681 mg 100 g(-1) for sauerkraut and roasted sunflower seeds, respectively). CONCLUSIONThis is the first study that provides validated data on the mineral content for 33 traditional foods from Black Sea area countries, which is important in order to elucidate their role in the dietary pattern of populations and to preserve and promote these foods. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据