友情提示：以下期刊信息可能会有更新，仅供参考，请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
Communications Physics
COMMUN PHYS-UK
ISSN / eISSN
2399-3650 / 2399-3650
目标和范围
Communications Physics is an open access journal from Nature Research publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the physical sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances bringing new insight to a specialized area of research in physics. We also aim to provide a community forum for issues of importance to all physicists, regardless of sub-discipline.
The scope of the journal covers all areas of experimental, applied, fundamental, and interdisciplinary physical sciences. Primary research published in Communications Physics includes novel experimental results, new techniques or computational methods that may influence the work of others in the sub-discipline. We also consider submissions from adjacent research fields where the central advance of the study is of interest to physicists, for example material sciences, physical chemistry and technologies.
The scope of the journal covers all areas of experimental, applied, fundamental, and interdisciplinary physical sciences. Primary research published in Communications Physics includes novel experimental results, new techniques or computational methods that may influence the work of others in the sub-discipline. We also consider submissions from adjacent research fields where the central advance of the study is of interest to physicists, for example material sciences, physical chemistry and technologies.
研究方向
物理：综合
CiteScore
8.60
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
| 类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy - General Physics and Astronomy | Q1 | #27/240 |
Web of Science 核心合集
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | - |
| 类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
|---|---|
| PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE | Q1 |
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Springer Nature
出版年份
2018
年文章数
326
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, GERMANY, 14197
认证评论
In the first round, there were three reviewers, one was positive, and the other two required major revisions. One of the reviewers raised 17 technical and mechanistic questions, while another reviewer was mainly unsatisfied with the model and said that a more accurate model was needed. In terms of experiments, all reviewers felt that they were done well and did not require additional experiments. However, the calibration of the time-domain spectroscopy and the terahertz field intensity were not clearly explained in the paper and needed to be supplemented. Overall, all reviewers provided constructive comments, showing their expertise in the field. It was my first time submitting an article, and I felt lucky to have these rigorous reviewers. I then responded to their requests and made modifications accordingly. However, I couldn't find a better model right away, so I tried to convince the reviewers that this model was used in other journals before, which should be suitable here.
In the second round, the second reviewer who suggested modifications to the model mentioned that I had provided more detailed descriptions of the mechanistic aspects later on and also praised the beautiful experiments. However, the first reviewer still found flaws in the mechanistic aspects and the time delay calibration. They strongly emphasized the importance of maintaining academic standards. This time, I was given three months to respond to the review.
Finally, I had to go back to the paper and finally found a suitable model to address the issues. In the last round, it was accepted for publication.
The whole process took about nine months.
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started