期刊名
Defence Technology

DEF TECHNOL

ISSN / eISSN
2096-3459 / 2214-9147
目标和范围
Defence Technology, sponsored by China Ordnance Society, is published quarterly and aims to become one of the well-known comprehensive journals in the world, which reports on the breakthroughs in defence technology by building up an international academic exchange platform for the defence technology related research. It publishes original research papers having direct bearing on defence, with a balanced coverage on analytical, experimental, numerical simulation and applied investigations. It covers various disciplines of science, technology and engineering.
研究方向

工程:综合

CiteScore
7.50 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Engineering - Computational Mechanics Q1 #9/85
Engineering - Metals and Alloys Q1 #22/164
Engineering - Mechanical Engineering Q1 #84/631
Engineering - Ceramics and Composites Q1 #29/123
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY - SCIE Q1
出版国家或地区
China
出版商
China Ordnance Society
出版周期
bimonthly
出版年份
1989
年文章数
173
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
ELSEVIER , RADARWEG 29, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1043 NX
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
We have basically blocked this. Domestic journals have an international version or follow the same procedures as domestic ones. The key issue is that there is no proper peer review process at all, it is simply a waste of time. I have submitted a few times and received arbitrary reasons, but it's mainly because of language issues. It seems like they didn't even read it. I have had success with International Journal of Industrial Engineering, so I don't need to pursue higher-level journals like this. I have already blocked it and won't submit anymore. Many people I know also don't submit to it anymore. It's quite disgusting, to be honest. Making a phone call or using personal connections is enough to get published in domestic journals.
2022-11-30
3.8 Submission
4.29: Major revision
5.11: Revised, under review on the same day
6.2: Decision in process
6.15: Accepted
There were a total of three reviewers, with two of them providing 9 comments each. One of the reviewers questioned the formulas used in the paper, asking deep questions. Another reviewer expressed high approval of the article, only raising one question and suggesting more references to be cited from American and Russian classic literature. The first review process was relatively fast, taking about 6 weeks. After the major revisions were submitted, it took one month for the reviewer to review and then the paper was with the editor for half a month. Overall, it was satisfactory.
2022-06-17

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started