友情提示:以下期刊信息可能会有更新,仅供参考,请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
MEASUREMENT
MEASUREMENT
ISSN / eISSN
0263-2241
目标和范围
Contributions are invited on novel achievements in all fields of measurement and instrumentation science and technology. Authors are encouraged to submit novel material, whose ultimate goal is an advancement in the state of the art of: measurement and metrology fundamentals, sensors, measurement instruments, measurement and estimation techniques, measurement data processing and fusion algorithms, evaluation procedures and methodologies for plants and industrial processes, performance analysis of systems, processes and algorithms, mathematical models for measurement-oriented purposes, distributed measurement systems in a connected world.
研究方向
工程:综合
仪器仪表
CiteScore
10.20
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy - Instrumentation | Q1 | #9/141 |
Physics and Astronomy - Electrical and Electronic Engineering | Q1 | #92/797 |
Web of Science 核心收藏夹
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2024) | 分区 |
---|---|
ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | Q1 |
INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION | Q1 |
H-index
70
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Elsevier
出版周期
Bimonthly
年文章数
1467
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OXON, OX5 1GB
认证评论
5.15 Major revision (six reviewers)
6.28 Major revision (two unsatisfactory comments from one reviewer)
8.10 Major revision (one additional reviewer added)
9.15 Acceptance
This submission and revision experience was truly unforgettable, as it was filled with various setbacks. The first submission was reviewed by six reviewers, among whom two had no suggestions for acceptance, while the other four provided some suggestions that were generally favorable, leading to a major revision requested by the editor. In the second submission, two questions from one reviewer were not passed, resulting in another major revision requested by the editor. Before the third submission, none of the original six reviewers had any further comments and suggested acceptance, making us think that there wouldn't be any issues. However, for unknown reasons, a seventh reviewer was added, whose comments were slightly negative, leading to another major revision. It felt like everything was about to collapse. We diligently worked on the revisions for half a month, making modifications and providing responses (although some suggestions were not modified, we provided sincere explanations, as it seemed that the reviewers did not fully understand certain aspects).
Overall, the speed of this submission process was relatively fast, and we grew a lot through the revision process. We are grateful to the journal and all the reviewers.
Translated text:
I am engaged in mechanical testing methods. Last year, I published two articles on measurement and would like to share the progress of the review process with everyone. I feel that measurement's efficiency is quite high. After submitting, it became "under review" after 3 days. After 14 days, I received major revision comments. I made the revisions myself within 14 days, and then received minor revision comments after another 14 days. I made the revisions on the same day and submitted them, and they were accepted.
The dates provided are as follows:
Article 1:
- Available online: 3 September 2020
- Received: 31 May 2020
- Received in revised form: 22 August 2020
- Accepted: 26 August 2020
Article 2:
- Available online: 10 January 2021
- Received: 26 October 2020
- Received in revised form: 27 December 2020
- Accepted: 4 January 2021
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started