Verified Reviews - Advanced Materials Interfaces
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

USTCJiangmim 2022-03-16

I submitted to AOM on December 20th and it took about ten days for the review. However, it was rejected. I suggested transferring the submission to AM interfaces and reluctantly did so on January 4th. On February 17th, I received the first review result, which allowed me ten days to make revisions. After submitting it again on the 27th, I lost patience after half a month of constantly seeing "under consideration" and criticizing this journal (thinking back now, it's quite amusing). On March 16th, I received a message. The efficiency was relatively high, whether it was due to my impatience or finding it slow. The reviewers provided very professional questions, but the overall evaluation was positive, so the acceptance was expected. The content is rich, and the chances of this innovative work being accepted are quite high. I am from a small group and it's frustrating that I can't make it to the top tier, but I will keep trying.

啊哈哈哈哈哈嘿 2022-03-14

Pretty fast, submitted on December 8th, 2021, received the review comments on January 10th, 2022, two reviewers provided a total of ten comments, the questions were not too difficult, made the revisions and submitted them in ten days, and it was accepted on January 30th, 2022. It took exactly two and a half months from submission to online publication.

科研GO7 2022-03-10

Hello, why is my application under consideration even though I have submitted it?

科研GO7 2022-03-10

Why is it taking so long for me to switch investment? How long does it usually take for the switch to be delivered to the editor's hands?

科研GO7 2022-03-10

Why is my transfer so slow? How long does it usually take for a transfer to reach the editor? What is the status change?

爱冒险的梦 2022-02-22

Translation: The AM investment was transferred to AMI. There were three reviewers, one with a positive opinion and the other two suggested major revisions. After making the necessary modifications, the paper was accepted. The review process was still very fast.

木木丁 2022-02-14

Submitted November 13, 2021
Final revisions submitted January 22, 2022
Accepted February 6, 2022
Fast speed, professional editorial reviewers, helpful questions raised, a very good journal, recommend submitting.

Liu512 2022-02-09

Submission date: December 2, 2021 (My first SCI submission, I wrote the paper by myself and it took me 4 months. I didn't know how it would turn out, but I saw that graduation was approaching, so I mustered up the courage to send it to my supervisor.
My supervisor said I could submit it to a tier 2 journal, so I suggested Wiley's AMI.
On January 17, 2022, I checked and it was actually accepted. The submission date displayed was January 17, and the review comments took a total of 45 days.
Editor's comments: Major revision, 20 days. Reviewer 2 found my paper interesting and novel, and gave me three or four suggestions for revisions. Reviewer 3 provided more than ten suggestions. Most of their comments pointed out small errors in the article (because I was too lazy to make changes after writing it and didn't ask anyone to proofread, so this issue indeed exists, and I know it myself).
On February 3, 2022, which was the third day of the lunar calendar, I submitted my response to the comments. In a small incident during the corresponding author confirmation stage, I accidentally clicked "decline to revise" and had to click it again to be able to make revisions. Surprisingly, I was still able to upload files. On February 5, 2022, the editor sent an email asking about the situation, and I explained that I clicked wrongly.
On February 9, 2022, when I logged into the submission system, I saw that it was accepted. The accompanying response only had feedback from reviewer 2, who said the article is very meaningful and recommended acceptance.)

ouyangqi007 2022-02-01

The first trial took over 70 days and required major repairs. After submission, a minor revision was given within 21 days. The current outcome is unknown, and it has been nearly four months!

FoFo 2022-01-27

Have you received the comments from the reviewers? It has been over 40 days for me, since I transferred from AEM.

读完博士再打工 2022-01-14

I submitted my paper to this journal twice, and both times they requested me to transfer it to another journal. I reluctantly agreed to transfer it after making some minor revisions. I feel like this journal has become a dumping ground for Small. Now it has become a low-quality option in terms of its ranking.

ouyangqi007 2022-01-13

May I ask how long it took for you to reply with your comments after the second round of review? I haven't heard anything for three weeks and it's almost been three months now.

毕业加速器 2022-01-06

October 25th submission,
December 1st major revision,
December 12th feedback,
January 6th acceptance.
Thank you to the editor and reviewers!
The speed is very fast, it would probably be even faster if it wasn't for Christmas in between!

Accept619 2021-12-24

Biomedical materials direction. I submitted to a small journal and transferred it here. The boss insisted on agreeing, which made me angry. It's a pity for this topic. I submitted on 11/25 and received the review comments on 12/14, minor revisions. I uploaded the revised comments on 12/17 and accepted on 12/21. This journal's level is similar to JMCB, why is JMCB classified as a second-tier journal while this one is still third-tier? In the future, it might be better to publish in RSC adv Sci report. They are all third-tier journals anyway.

十一 2021-12-20

Our previous article also took a full two months for the first trial.

ouyangqi007 2021-12-17

I would like to ask everyone, it has been exactly two months since I submitted on October 18th, and I still haven't received any news. Is this normal? Should I remind them to review my submission? I'm seeking a response from someone knowledgeable.

sciscisci1986 2021-12-08

According to the latest news from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, only the upgraded version of zoning will be displayed next year, and there will be no information about the basic class zoning in the future. Does this mean that AMI will become Zone 3?

chong10啊 2021-11-08

Advanced materials technology suggestion turns to AMI
9.9 Turn investment
10.21 First trial, two reviewers suggest minor revisions, editor suggests major revisions within 10 days
10.29 Return
11.8 Accept

嗑盐小白 2021-11-04

2021.09.07 Post
Received notice of major revisions on October 12, but there were only two reviewers with a total of 20 review comments. Made some additional experiments to address them.
Accepted on October 31, 2021.

请叫我苗哥 2021-10-20

I have been working on my school assignment for over 20 days, and I still haven't gone online.

xiaxia1993 2021-10-08

Yes, the status of this magazine has always been under consideration and has not changed.

gaozelin 2021-10-01

Classmate, is your status still "under consideration" after submitting it until receiving the feedback for major revisions?

xiaxia1993 2021-09-08

Submission: 6/25/2021
First review: 7/30/2021 (Three reviewers conducted major revisions, and the editor gave ten days)
Revised: 8/6/2021
Accepted: 9/3/2021
The review process was quite fast, and the reviewers were also very meticulous.

小刘要发 2021-08-30

Is the submission status always under consideration? Mine is like this.

冲鸭!!! 2021-08-23

How long does it take from receiving the draft to the online publication?

小刘要发 2021-08-14

Half a month of rejection, let's try another submission.

wang yk 2021-07-12

2020.12.20 Submission
2021.1.28 Reviewer Comments: Two reviewers, a total of five suggested modifications, not very difficult. One reviewer believed it could be published.
2021.2.11 Revised and responded to the comments.
2021.3.14 Acceptance.
It took a little over two months in total because the issues were not very difficult and the revisions were relatively simple. It should have been accepted quickly after responding to the comments, but it took one month, possibly due to the Chinese New Year holiday. If it hadn't been delayed, two months would have been sufficient.

zhang_1 2021-07-11

The review process is quite slow, I submitted on May 24th and only received news on July 10th. However, the reviewers are still very meticulous.

sciscisci1986 2021-06-30

2020 Impact Factor, 6.147, growing rapidly!

jiao13 2021-06-24

Currently, there is no online available.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More