芃芃不是梵梵 2022-08-31

You have finished with the editor, and I am still in the initial assessment from the 20th until today.

Mao毛 2022-08-28

Why is it so slow this time? It has been 8 days since I submitted, and it is still with the editor. Does anyone know if it can still be reviewed like this?

Mao毛 2022-08-26

The speed is a bit slow. The chosen editor is from Australia, and I'm not sure if I will be assigned to them. I submitted the article on August 20th, and after that, there was a preliminary check and evaluation. Then, it has been continuously "with editor" without any changes. I will continue to share any updates once there is news.

Rock you 2022-07-14

Hello, I would like to ask if submitting to this journal requires uploading the raw data?

hh 2022-07-09

Fast review, short publication cycle.

accept！！！ 2022-06-10

2022.03.12 submitted
03.15 with editor
03.18 in peer review
03.20 with editor
03.24 in peer review
03.25 with editor
03.29 in peer review
04.22 with editor
04.24 in peer review
05.02 Major Revision (two reviewers)
05.22 Resubmitted
05.23 with editor
05.28 in peer review
06.09 accept

kingsley 2022-05-27

5.20 major revision
5.24 resubmitted
5.27 accepted

kingsley 2022-04-27

4.21 submitted
4.22 initial assessment
4.25 with editor (Europeans really don't do any work on weekends)

——————
A summary of an invited manuscript, hoping everything goes smoothly.

kingsley 2022-04-27

4.21 submitted
4.22 initial assessment
4.25 with editor (Europeans really don't do any work on weekends)

——————
A summary of a commissioned article, hoping everything goes smoothly.

accept！！！ 2022-03-21

Hello, why do you keep going back and forth in peer review and with the editor? Are you continuously looking for reviewers?

活蹦乱跳 2022-02-16

The paper in the field of tissue engineering took a little over a month for the first review, with two reviewers providing very professional suggestions for revisions. They recommended additional experiments and had quite challenging perspectives. One of the reviewers raised innovative questions, but the editor still asked for major revisions. After the revisions, the second review took only a week, and the paper was given minor revisions. The reviewers only pointed out language issues (although the revisions had already been proofread, oops). The revised paper was accepted in less than a week. The editor's efficiency was quite high, and the reviewers were very professional. The editor was very nice. Once again, I am grateful to JMCB and wish JMCB continued success!

xiaxia1993 2022-02-15

11.23 Submission
12.28 Three reviewers
1.22 Revision
2.14 Accepted
The process was quite fast, and the reviewers were very meticulous. One of the reviewers raised 12 major issues (most of which included two or three minor issues), ranging from details to mechanisms, and from writing to supplementary experiments. It was highly professional and greatly improved the article. Hoping that JMCB's impact factor will continue to increase (๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧

1006 2022-01-27

From submission to acceptance took over two months. The manuscript was handled promptly and efficiently, and the reviewers were professional.

qq572020211 2021-10-13

It went quite smoothly, and the reviewers were also very professional. There were a total of 5 reviewers, one of whom had some reservations about the manuscript, but they were still able to provide feedback, so it was still friendly overall. I hope JMCB continues to improve.

麦旋风没有风 2021-10-08

2021-07-28 Submission
2021-08-21 Review comments returned, with a total of two reviewers. One raised some minor issues, while the second one hardly provided any comments, only regarding formatting issues. However, I didn't quite understand the major revisions suggested by the editor, so I managed to make the changes myself within four hours.
2021-09-10 The teacher took half a month to return the manuscript.
2021-10-08 Accepted directly.
The whole process took over two months, not as fast as expected. The first article was rejected after being reviewed by articles with a score of 12 or above. I didn't bother to make further changes and submitted it to JMCB, so at least it found a place to be published.

qq572020211 2021-10-05

Soon, all four reviewers were very friendly, waiting for their acceptance.

文艺复兴的哲学家 2021-09-07

8.20 submission
8.27 reply for major revision
9.4 modification and resubmission
9.7 acceptance
Efficiency is relatively high.

红日 2021-08-16

2021.5.17 submission
2021.5.19 in peer review (two reviewers)
2021.6.7 major revision
2021.6.24 revision submission
2021.6.24 in peer review (one reviewer delayed for almost a month due to COVID-19)
2021.8.11 accept

古萌萌 2021-06-26

2021.5.20 submission
2021.5.23 in peer review
2021.6.09 minor review - The two reviewers gave very nice comments. They did not require additional experiments, but they had some requirements regarding the format of the references and the font size in the images.
2021.6.19 revision submission
2021.6.21 in peer review
2021.6.25 accept

保4争3 2021-05-31

2021.5.13 checking submission and files
2021.5.16 in peer review

Translation:
2021.5.13 checking submission and files
2021.5.16 in peer review