是豆豆啊 2022-01-04

[张永辉] Post time: 2021-12-30 09:09:26
Why hasn't my [work] reached the editor even after five days? It's Christmas, no one is working, so it definitely hasn't arrived.

张永辉 2021-12-30

Why hasn't my with editor arrived after five days?

匿名K 2021-12-29

An article is valuable as long as it can be published. There are always aspects worth learning from. The progress in each field is built upon countless works. Good ideas can be published in good journals, while even though not-so-good ideas may not be well-received by journals, they still contribute to the improvement of a discipline. Criticizing this journal like this makes it seem like you don't understand research or haven't published any articles yourself.

chemeng 2021-12-29

10.28 submitted and initial assessment
11.2 with editor
11.2 under review. The associate editor is Shizhang Qiao. The review process was fast and timely.
12.7 major revision. There were two reviewers in the first round, with one opinion received. Three weeks later, three reviewers were involved in the second round, with one opinion received.
12.15 revision submitted
12.16 with editor and under review
1.28 accept. Thank you to the editor for working during the holidays!
This paper is on traditional heterogeneous catalysis. We are very satisfied that it was accepted by JMCA (Journal of Materials Chemistry A), as this journal is known for its interest in energy materials research. This is the first time our work has been accepted by this journal. As for the ranking by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, I don't think we should pay too much attention to it. The ranking should not determine the quality of a journal. The quality of a journal is accumulated and established over time, as well as judged by the community.

Adobe-2015 2021-12-28

Jmca, acsami, and others will soon establish themselves as the second-tier journals. This is very reasonable, and there is no injustice. This is because many articles in the materials field only require patterned research, characterization, sending for testing, calculating, and finding collaborators. There is an abundance of electrochemical data, which looks extremely glamorous. In reality, it is just a way of flooding the field, and it holds no value for the progress of materials science.

张永辉 2021-12-27

Have you submitted it for review? Buddy.

W324 2021-12-22

Mine is also like this. May I ask what is the situation?

W324 2021-12-22

2021/12/17 submitted
2021/12/17 initial assessment
2021/12/21 with editor
Not yet reviewed, looking forward to good news.

oolili 2021-12-20

The domestic journal "Journal of Historical Geography" has achieved the top ranking in Zone 1 this year. The annual publication volume is 7 articles.

润成 2021-12-20

Warmly celebrate that domestic journals have achieved a new high in the ranking of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

dfs 2021-12-20

This journal is not doing well, it has been in the second tier for two consecutive years!

是豆豆啊 2021-12-20

2021/12/08 SUBMITTED
Submitted on December 8th, 2021.

当天Initial assessment
Initial assessment on the same day.

2021/12/10 with editor
With editor on December 10th, 2021.

2021/12/19 in peer review
In peer review on December 19th, 2021.

整体速度偏慢
Overall speed is slow.

liudalu 2021-11-26

2021.8.31 - Submitted
2021.9.8 - Under review
2021.9.28 - Major revision
2021.11.1 - Sent back for rework
2021.11.10 - Accepted

趴趴猴子 2021-11-25

10.8 Submission, 10.28 in peer review, 11.10 Minor revision, 11.23 Returned after minor revision, 11.24 Accepted.

QAZXSW 2021-11-20

May I ask if these two states have been constantly changing because there have been people rejecting the review? How many reviewers do you have for your first review?

skywathcer 2021-11-19

The submission was sent for review two days after being submitted on September 21st. On November 13th, after receiving the review results, both reviewers highly praised the article and suggested minor revisions before accepting it. The editor requested major revisions. After making the modifications, the revised version was sent for review two hours later on November 18th. It was accepted on November 19th. This can be considered a very smooth submission process. The editor, Professor Lou Xiongwen, was very responsible and fast. Highly praised!

GKLSAKLA 2021-11-14

Hello, did you later figure out what the situation was? My article is also like this.

fighttu12 2021-11-12

I was rejected by Ami and turned to Jmca, finally accepted.

小美爱科研 2021-11-11

Do I need a template for submitting an article?

yuantongtong 2021-11-01

Hello, may I ask if I need to use their template when submitting an article, or is plain text sufficient?

zp435761201 2021-10-31

Review will take two weeks for feedback;

Two minor revisions;

Submit again after one week for direct acceptance.

投中 2021-10-28

I don't know if JMCA can return to Zone 1 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences this year.

想中啊 2021-10-06

Which editor did you vote for?

zhanglovexs 2021-09-21

Submitted on June 5th
Rejection with revision request given by the editor on June 28th (three reviewers, two major revisions, one rejection)
Revised on July 28th
Major revision on August 12th (sent back to two original reviewers and found a new reviewer: one accepted directly, one major revision, one minor revision)
Revised on September 11th
Accepted on September 20th
Thank you to the editor and reviewers for their support.

yudishu 2021-09-20

The journal is still good, but recently it feels like the editors have been a little slow in handling the manuscripts, which is quite different from the first time we submitted. The editor (Professor Viola Birss from the University of Calgary) seems to be delaying the review process. This is the second time she has accepted our manuscript.

搬个小板凳看奥特曼 2021-09-20

Share the submission process for everyone's reference...
Submitted on May 29th
Major revisions on July 29th
Revised on August 8th
Major revisions on August 26th
Revised on September 1st
Accepted on September 2nd
If it was two days later, I would have missed the scholarship... I don't know if I should say I am lucky or unlucky...

胡巴巴 2021-09-17

Normal formatting is fine, double spacing is not necessary.

NicoleZ 2021-09-17

Do you need to change the format to double-column for submitting to JMCA? Or is the normal format sufficient?

胡巴巴 2021-09-14

Submitted on 8.11, received feedback on 9.02. Accepted major revisions and minor revisions. Editor provided major revisions. Revised on 9.08 and accepted on 9.14. I feel lucky as the processing speed was surprisingly fast. I hope everyone has the same good luck!

rhylongbai 2021-09-13

This journal is really slow to the point of speechlessness... It has been over a month now... Looking at the comments, it takes 2 to 6 months for many people... It's really frustrating.