leoliuyb 2022-05-04

Mine was also submitted on April 22nd. It's already May 4th, but it still shows "initial assessment." I don't know what went wrong. ?

爱你璐璐 2022-05-02

4.22 submission
5.02 rejected after editing, working on Labor Day can also be considered dedication.

蓬蓬的叶子 2022-04-11

2022.2.17 submitted;
2022.3.23 major revision;
2022.4.9 resubmission;
2022.4.11 accepted.

xiangqq 2022-03-18

2022.1.4 submitted - Submitted on January 4, 2022.
2022.2.3 major revision - Major revision on February 3, 2022.
2022.2.9 resubmission - Resubmitted on February 9, 2022.
2022.3.10 acceptance - Accepted on March 10, 2022.
After the major revision was submitted, it remained in the "with editor" status. Despite reminders sent to the editorial office, there was no response. It was only after a month that the comments came back, revealing that the original two reviewers had conducted a second review.

yuyaotop 2022-03-18

March 2nd - Receive
March 3rd - Go live
March 11th - Proof
March 14th - Go live

chennan 2022-03-02

2022.01.17 submitted
2022.01.18 initial assessment
2022.01.20 With Editor
2022.01.26 in peer review
2022.02.10 Minor Revision
2022.02.27 Checking submission and files
2022.02.28 With Editor
2022.03.02 Accepted
A very pleasant submission experience~

笨笨 2022-02-24

The image does not require such high demands, it is sufficient to handle it normally and place it clearly in the body of the text.

终点站 2022-02-24

2022-01-20 Submitted
2022-01-20 Initial assessment
2022-01-24 With editor
2022-01-25 In peer review
2022-02-01 With editor
2022-02-04 In peer review
2022-02-23 Reject

The work was done in calculations, but it was sent to two experimental reviewers who looked down on the computational work subjectively. They hastily raised 2-3 minor issues and rejected the submission. The experience was also very poor, and the reviewer's comments were not helpful for the article. It can only be said that submitting also depends on luck, and I hope for better luck in the future!

Fhk 2022-02-22

It is February 22nd, and it is still in peer review.

杨国纯 2022-02-22

Submitted on May 4th, 21
Significant revisions according to the review comments received on June 9th, 21 (one acceptance, one rejection, and 20 minor revisions)
Response to the comments on June 20th, 21
Accepted on July 2nd, 21

是豆豆啊 2022-02-21

Yes, anyway, that's how I do it.

blqk 2022-02-19

Who can answer, does this journal require images to be at least 600 dpi? Does the same requirement apply to images inserted in Word? High quality images can either be embedded in a doc(x) file or provided as separate numbered Figures, Schemes or Charts in .tif, .eps or .pdf format, with a resolution of 600 dpi or greater.

Fhk 2022-02-14

Posted on January 11, 2022 (The submission in November 2021 was rejected, resubmitted with experimental supplements according to the reviewer's feedback, and reassigned a new number) On that day, Checking submission and files;
January 14, still in Initial assessment;
January 17, with editor
January 21, in peer review
Today is February 14, the result is unknown, hoping for acceptance. I have already graduated, but this work was done during my doctoral period and was the longest and most substantial work. Hoping for a good outcome.

Love Fish 2022-01-29

The review process took three weeks, and after a week and a half of revisions, it was submitted. It was accepted three days later.

yuyaotop 2022-01-24

2022.01.24 Major Revision: One reviewer raised 8 major concerns, comprising a total of 30 minor issues.

是豆豆啊 2022-01-24

2022/1/22 Rework
2022/1/24 Reception
Regarding the sensing direction, it was rejected by ACS NANO, and I am grateful that JMCA accepted it.

BLD 2022-01-22

Correction: Posted on 2022/01/07.

BLD 2022-01-22

Posted on 2021/01/07 with editor in progress...

Elmagnifico 2022-01-21

RSC journals now send a link to the submission email to track the manuscript, allowing authors to see the progress of their submission, the assigned editor, the number of reviewers who agreed to review the manuscript, and the number of review comments received.

一年2篇 2022-01-20

May I ask why I can't see how many reviewers there are? Some reviewers have rejected the review, right? Is it only possible to see this if I have a submission account?

Elmagnifico 2022-01-20

Share personal experience, I have written down specific dates that I can remember, for those I can't remember, please understand.

10/25/2021: Submitted the manuscript, initial assessment took 2 days. On 10/28, it entered peer review. On 11/1, one reviewer agreed to review, and after another week (I forgot which day), the second reviewer agreed to review. Then, there was a long wait until late November when one review comment was received, but the second comment was still not received. In early December, the editor found a third reviewer.

12/14/2021: First review completed, received 2 reports with a total of 13 questions, some major and some minor. The editor requested major revisions.

01/06/2022: Completed the revisions and submitted.

01/10/2022: Accepted.

01/19/2022: Proof is ready for checking (I'm not sure what this is called in Chinese either).

Overall, the experience was good. The reviewers were very thorough. As our article was very long, with additional materials of over 10,000 words, one reviewer even discovered a spelling mistake in the annotation of one of our figures (it was too meticulous, no wonder it took over a month for the review). Previously, we submitted the article to EES and it was rejected after the second review. Although it was highly innovative, there were indeed some flaws. The reviewers' comments were quite insightful, and the overall evaluation was fair.

For our unnamed small research group, after countless rejections, finally having an article accepted was not easy.

yuyaotop 2022-01-20

Have you returned with the revised suggestions?

yuyaotop 2022-01-19

In my first week, I was also sent back to the editing department again. It should be because the reviewer rejected it, and then it was submitted for review again.

turky 2022-01-18

Experience of submission:
Submitted on 2021/12/7
With editor on 2021/12/14
In peer review on 2021/12/28
Minor revision on 2022/1/10
Revision submitted on 2022/1/15
Accepted on 2022/1/18
After submission, it was still very prompt.

yuyaotop 2022-01-17

2021.12.29 submitted
2021.12.30 initial assessment
2022.01.04 with editor
2022.01.05 in peer review
2022.01.09 with editor
2022.01.10 In peer review

Translated:
2021.12.29 submitted
2021.12.30 initial assessment
2022.01.04 with editor
2022.01.05 in peer review
2022.01.09 with editor
2022.01.10 in peer review

一年2篇 2022-01-14

It should be finding the third reviewer.

后面没有路可走 2022-01-07

2020/11/26 submitted - Submitted on November 26, 2020.
过了大约两周，in peer review - After about two weeks, in peer review.
2022/01/06 With Editor - With Editor on January 6, 2022.
2022/01/07 in peer review - In peer review on January 7, 2022.
这是编辑又重新找审稿人？ - Did the editor find new reviewers again?

W324 2022-01-06

"12.23 in peer review" translates to "12.23 undergoing peer review" in English.

是豆豆啊 2022-01-06

Just to add, there will be a major revision of 1.4. Once submitted, the review process will still be relatively short.

南大小陈 2022-01-05

11.23 submit
11.30 in peer review (reviewed after one week)
12.21 with editor
12.25 in peer review
As of now (01.04.2022) in peer review
For reference, good luck!