Verified Reviews - Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

mrvita 2023-02-22

The submission was made on February 10th and is still undergoing initial assessment.

知否 2023-02-20

How long has it been since you changed with the editor? My status hasn't changed in a long time either.

追光者666 2023-02-20

Senior, are you doing major repairs or minor repairs? Why are you so fast?

esmond 2023-02-14

I'm sorry, but "acs catal>acb>jmca" does not appear to be a coherent sentence or phrase in any language. It seems to be a combination of abbreviations or codes that do not have a clear meaning. Could you please provide more context or clarify the text?

冷面男 2023-02-13

Dear colleagues, may I ask how influential is JMCA in the field of catalysis? Is it better than ACB? Surely it is worse than ACS Catal, right?

Shuang. 2023-02-13

2.5 Initial assessment
2.9 In peer review

I hope to pass this time, it can also be considered as a small compensation for my regret of not passing JMCA before.

lalayaya 2023-02-10

Posted on January 25th, repaired on February 7th, accepted on February 9th, online on February 10th, the speed is quite fast. Unfortunately, it dropped to Zone 2 this year, and even the IF of nearly 15 still decreased.

星月夜 2023-01-31

2022.12.16 Submitting
2022.12.27 Major Revision (Two reviewers, one raised five questions, and the other raised ten questions)
2023.01.10 Revision Submitting
2023.01.19 Major Revision (One reviewer agreed to accept, while the other reviewer raised three more questions)
2023.01.29 Revision Submitting
2023.01.31 Accepted

greedyboy 2023-01-20

On the evening of January 4th, the manuscript was submitted for review by two reviewers. The first reviewer completed the review on January 10th, but the second reviewer has not finished yet. Generally, opinions that take a long time to review are not usually good.

吱吱芊 2023-01-19

Hello, my article was received and it took about two weeks for the editing and proof email to be sent. However, there was no link inside. I would like to ask if you have encountered this situation before. If I need to contact the editor, should I send an email directly to their email address or contact the magazine?

2032jia 2023-01-18

It's probably vacation time, it's been 20 days already.

2032jia 2023-01-18

Is there a result now?

2032jia 2023-01-18

How are you now? Any latest news? I submitted on the 29th, but there's still no update. It has been half a month and it's still being edited.

ztyzzz 2023-01-09

11.05 Submission
11.25 Revision
12.19 Acceptance

The speed is very fast, and the editor is also very professional. The reviewers who reviewed the submission should also be experts in the industry. The opinions they provided are very valuable for reference. With the approval of all four reviewers, I am smoothly accepted. I hope JMCA will continue to improve and I am very grateful!

花柳朵 2023-01-07

CEJ has been rejected for more than a few weeks without being reviewed. The editor said it lacks innovation. Sigh, after submitting to jmca, it is now close to the second round. It may remain in the second round for a while.

musen 2023-01-03

The submission was made on December 19th, and it is still in the initial assessment process...

Polymer6789 2022-12-31

Mine too, it has been 20 days and it's still with the editor...

greedyboy 2022-12-30

Submitted on December 13th, until now, December 30th, it is still with the editor. Can you give me a satisfactory answer?

esmond 2022-12-26

Unfortunately, I am unable to access specific webpages or URLs. However, if you could provide the text or information you would like to have translated, I would be more than happy to assist you.

追光者666 2022-12-25

Dear seniors, do we need to use a template for submitting to JMCA? What is the general format?

杨若林 2022-12-23

Is there still no result?

Z8x2j8 2022-12-18

Excuse me, has it gone through the process of peer review?

杨若林 2022-12-10

How are you doing? Is there any result?

曦曦ms 2022-12-03

2022.10.22 submitting
2022.10.23 with editor, but the article did not end up in the chosen editor's hands, it went to Dr. Jennifer Rupp FRSC for editing. The editor was quick and urged me to make revisions.
2022.10.25 in peer review
2022.11.06 major revision
2022.11.22 revision submitted
2022.12.02 accepted

kb24 2022-12-01

2022-11-16 submitted
2022-11-17 initial assessment
2022-11-20 with editor
2022-12-01 reject

I feel like I did a decent job on this work, but it was rejected by the editor after half a month of review, citing lack of novelty in the article. I hope to have better luck with my next submission and also wish JMCA continued success.

ljy 2022-11-14

2022.9.22 submitting - Submitted on September 22, 2022
2022. 9.29 with editor - Under review by the editor on September 29, 2022
2022. 10.03 in peer review - Undergoing peer review on October 3, 2022
2022. 10.28 major revision - Major revisions requested on October 28, 2022
2022. 11.10 revision submitted - Revised version submitted on November 10, 2022
2022. 11.14 accepted - Accepted on November 14, 2022

YSC 2022-11-07

Will the probability of this situation being submitted for review be high?

esmond 2022-11-07

The initial assessment should take no more than ten days.

YSC 2022-11-07

It's already 11.7, but it hasn't changed yet.

YSC 2022-11-06

What happened on October 31st, the day of the initial assessment, and until today, November 6th, the status has remained unchanged. Does anyone know what's going on?

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started