Yi-NIT 2021-05-23

Submission on April 5th, review on the 18th, a comprehensive review of a freely submitted article.

Jay21 2021-05-20

2021-05-12 submitted
2021-05-14 in peer review
2021-05-20 major revision

letpub李 2021-05-18

4.30 submitted - This means that something was submitted at 4:30.

5.10 peer review - This means that something is undergoing peer review at 5:10.

victor_sjtu 2021-05-18

2021-05-11: submitted
2021-05-12: initial assessment
2021-05-15: with editor
The current status is still "with editor" (2021-05-18).
Just marking the timeline. After submitting, I've been feeling anxious and have been reading about others' submission experiences. I thought I'd share mine too~ If there are no further updates, it's likely that my submission has been rejected. I hope for some good luck. Wishing everyone the best!

icetherm 2021-05-01

21.03.04 Submit
21.03.19 Major revision
21.04.08 Revise
21.04.22 Revision
21.04.23 Revise
21.04.30 Accept

Regarding the solar cell journal, the reviewers raised many questions, but it feels like most of them were unnecessary... and strangely, after the first review, one reviewer raised some new questions... but fortunately, it was ultimately accepted. I hope JMCA can continue to improve and return to the top tier!

小白牙呀 2021-04-27

The review process is quite slow, but as long as it is submitted for review, the efficiency is very high! I have been refreshing here since submitting, hoping that my timeline can serve as a reference for everyone.
3.6 Submitted for review
3.22 In peer review
4.5 Major revision with a minor revision, addressing 7-8 questions, all of which were answered.
4.18 Revised
4.26 Accepted

Ericchiang 2021-04-23

3.11 Headache
4.1 Major repair
4.19 Repair revision
4.23 Accept

科学怪人乀群爷 2021-04-20

Source: Wudaokou Vocational and Technical College
3.10 Submission
3.19 Review
4.1 Major revision (Three reviewers, one for direct acceptance, one for minor revision, one for major revision)
4.10 Revision
4.19 Acceptance

小白牙呀 2021-04-20

Hello, may I ask if your overview is invited?

@silence 2021-04-15

2020.02.24 submitted
2020.03.10 major revision
2020.03.28 submitted
2020.04.01 major revision (Two reviewers, one acceptance, the other has questions)
2020.04.03 submitted
2020.04.14 accept
For reference only

yjfyjf 2021-04-09

0305 submission, it has been 35 days and still no news, is it dead?

Zues 2021-04-02

1.31 submitted
Same-day initial assessment
2.5 with editor
2.7 in peer review
3.1 major revision
Revisions required
3.8 revision submitted
3.12 accepted
In short, it was very prompt.

DJDJDJDJXH 2021-04-01

The text translates to: "The process of my submission is similar to yours, and until now, there hasn't been any result. There is a high possibility of rejection."

小豆 2021-04-01

The boss forced me to submit, knowing that it would be rejected, but I really rejected it too slowly! We agreed on half a month!

3.1 submitted
Initial assessment on the same day
3.5 with editor
3.11 in peer review
3.16 with editor
3.17 in peer review
3.31 rejected
There were two reviewers, one provided very detailed and fair feedback, while the other just glanced at it hastily and had a sharp tone.

Hins 2021-03-29

2020.12.18 First submission
2021.01.02 Rejection (revised twice)
2021.01.13 Sent an email to the journal's mailbox to apply for an appeal after revision
2021.01.26 Editor replied and agreed to the appeal, but the deadline had passed, so it needed to be resubmitted, but counted as an appeal
2021.01.29 Resubmission
2021.02.15 Major revision (rejected once and revised once)
2021.02.24 Revised
2021.03.14 Major revision (rejected once and revised once)
2021.03.24 Revised
2021.03.28 Accepted
It took more than four months from start to finish, and it required a lot of effort. Thank you to the editor and the reviewers.

小豆 2021-03-29

You are really fast, at least you know the news.

科学怪人乀群爷 2021-03-27

However, your speed is really quite fast.

May 2021-03-27

submitted 3.17
with editor 3.19
in peer review 3.23
reject 3.27

Two reviewers, one accepted with revisions, one only raised three questions without clear opinions and was perfunctory. The raised questions did not correspond to the figures and text. Sigh, the editor rejected it.

The editor is Prof. Jennifer Rupp. Very cruel... very angry.

anonymous01 2021-03-22

2021.1.4 Submitted, source from Germany
2021.2.4 Major revision, both reviewers gave positive feedback, didn't mention the specific deadline but will be reminded every two weeks.
2021.3.7 Submitted revisions
2021.3.11 Accepted
Thanks to Prof. Yichun Lu for editing and the professional reviewers.

默默的耕耘者 2021-03-18

Not yet, still under review.

小白牙呀 2021-03-16

Could you please tell us if the system has changed to "with editor" or "in peer review", downstairs?

小白牙呀 2021-03-16

How are you, the original poster?

小白牙呀 2021-03-16

I want to ask if there has been no change in the system from 11.25 to 12.17. I have been submitting for about 10 days and it is still showing as "submitted."

小豆 2021-03-16

Mine is 3.5 in editor, 3.11 in peer review. Just got 3.16 with editor, very similar to yours. Have you figured out what's going on?

怎么才能中大文章 2021-03-02

12.13 submitted
12.27 in peer review
01.13 major revision
01.25 revision submitted
02.08 accepted

The review process was quite lengthy, but everything went smoothly afterwards.

默默的耕耘者 2021-03-01

Admiring, you are so fast.

Nimman41 2021-03-01

01.28 submitted: Initial assessment on the same day
02.02 with editor
02.03 in peer review
02.16 minor revision: Both reviewers indicated that the revised version can be accepted
02.21 revision submitted
02.27 accepted
Overall, the initial assessment was relatively slow, but once the review process started, it was quite fast. Additionally, typically, minor revisions are accepted directly, but this time, it took almost a week because the editor sent it back to the reviewers; perhaps this was due to the editor's personal handling style, as previously, JMCA accepted major revisions directly. We hope everyone's submissions go smoothly.

默默的耕耘者 2021-03-01

The time is a bit long, have any of you encountered this situation?
JMCA submission record
1.12.31 submitted
2.01.07 with editor
3.01.22 in peer review
4.01.27 with editor
5.02.01 in peer review
6.02.03 with editor
7.02.10 in peer review
8.02.18 morning with editor
9.02.18 afternoon in peer review
10.02.22 morning with editor
11.02.22 evening in peer review
12.02.28 afternoon with editor
13.03.01 in peer review

acaddog 2021-02-24

What is your major, and what is the topic of your thesis?

acaddog 2021-02-24

What field are you in, OP?