Verified Reviews - ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

材优干济 2022-06-28

I have five reviewers, but it's difficult to deal with the comments from just one reviewer.

Kreveng 2022-06-23

Have you never submitted a journal to ACS? Once the submission is completed in the ACS submission system, it will show "Under review" on the main page. This doesn't mean it has been sent for review yet. Firstly, the manuscript will go to the editor-in-chief, who will then assign associate editors to review the manuscript. At that time, you will receive a message from the assigned associate editor via email. If you want to know the status of your manuscript, you need to click on the "Author Center" in the upper right corner to check. Only when it shows "peer review" does it mean it has been sent for review.

wuuuuu 2022-06-21

I have been under review all along, and I don't know what the situation is.

wuuuuu 2022-06-21

May I ask the original poster, is it normal for the status to show "Under Review" immediately after submitting? I submitted on May 28th and it has been under review ever since. Help!

wuuuuu 2022-06-21

I would like to ask the original poster which editor did they send it to. I submitted it on 5.28 and sent it to the editor in Taiwan, but still haven't received any updates.

chaolal 2022-06-17

The second article is sustainable, although it has been quite challenging, but I am very grateful to Professor T. Pradeep, the Indian editor.

木木999 2022-06-16

Less than 7000, I made a mistake above.

木木999 2022-06-16

Excuse me, does this journal require the word count to be less than 700 after adding figures and tables?

yayaRR 2022-06-15

Is there any news? The one assigned to me is also the editor-in-chief himself, but I haven't received any news for over a month.

xxbuweinan 2022-06-15

Posted on April 12th, received by the editor on the same day, sent for review the next day.
Received reviewer's comments on April 28th (two minor revisions, one major revision, and one rejection), editor requested major revision.
Returned on May 27th.
Sent back on June 7th due to a high similarity score, explanation required.
Returned on June 14th.
Minor modifications made to the formatting on June 15th, accepted on the same day!
(Special thanks to Han Hongxian, editor at Dalian Institute of Physical Chemistry, for providing the opportunity to reduce the similarity score and wishing the journal continued success!)

Xuedong He 2022-06-08

March 25th submitted
May 2nd received first-round comments
May 20th received review comments
June 8th editor accepted and addressed formatting issues

JTLove 2022-06-06

After modifying the format and submitting, it is still in peer review. Moreover, the status update in this area is delayed, not as fast as the place where the submission is being reviewed (the place where it is always "under review"). The status updates there are relatively quick, and it is where updates for revisions, submissions, and acceptances are first made. The acceptance after modifying the format and submitting is rapid.

霉运缠身 2022-06-04

May I ask what is the status after submitting the edited manuscript? Mine has been accepted by all three reviewers, pre-accepted, but the editor requested format changes. After submitting, it has now changed to "in peer review" again. Does this mean it is being reviewed again? Does it imply that new reviewers have been assigned? I feel so uncomfortable!

BOSH 2022-06-01

The review process was very fast, with three reviewers who all provided professional comments. I am sincerely grateful to Professor Han Hongxian, the associate editor of the journal, for his great responsibility.

kongnizao 2022-05-10

Is this journal slow in reviewing recently? I have assigned it to Associate Editor Dr. Jeannette Garcia for almost three weeks and it hasn't been reviewed yet.

yolo365 2022-05-10

May 6th: Submitted.
On the same day, Associate Editor Assigned.
Editor (Prof. Lin Zhuang).
No progress so far, I estimate it will be rejected again.

周大人 2022-04-22

I am exactly the same as your interface,
In my authoring activity, when I submitted it to the editorial office, it showed "Under review" in the drop-down menu. I submitted it a little after 11 PM, and it showed "Under review" on the same day. I don't really understand what it means.

kongnizao 2022-04-20

Brother, how long does it take for a submission to be reviewed after being assigned to Associate Editor Jeannette Garcia?

周大人 2022-04-20

Why do I get prompted with a password error every time I enter this journal? I have to change my password every time.

kongnizao 2022-04-18

Brother, what direction are you working on? Who will it be assigned to?

Juanne 2022-04-15

To add, Professor Bing Joe Hwang is also from Taiwan.

Juanne 2022-04-15

February 29th submission
March 9th review
Until now, April 15th, the results have not yet come back
What progress has everyone made?

Fhk 2022-04-06

I have submitted my third job to this magazine. The previous two were accepted after revision, so I hope this time everything goes smoothly. Here is a timeline:
Submitted on March 28, 2022. Assigned to Associate Editor Prof. T. Pradeep in India on March 29. It shows "in peer review" on April 2. Let's wait for further updates.

zeo1 2022-04-05

I specifically came here to register and talk about this article edited by Bing Joe Hwang. It has been under review for a month. The day before yesterday, I received the review comments. All three reviewers said my research is garbage, without a single positive comment. It made me laugh because when I submitted to EA (presumably a different journal), at least three reviewers affirmed my work. Only one reviewer rejected it, citing unclear explanations of my mechanism. Although there were many suggestions given, each one seemed absurd and it appeared that they did not want research in this field and forcefully provided rejection opinions. In the future, I will definitely recommend rejecting this editor and accepting manuscripts for this journal.

Zhen 2022-03-30

Rejected by several magazines, finally turned to this one.
On January 18th, submitted the manuscript and assigned an editor.
On February 18th, received the first round of feedback, which were minor suggestions. The editor made minor revisions and due to the pandemic, the revised manuscript was sent back on March 1st. Surprisingly, it was sent for a second round of review.
On March 18th, received the second round of feedback, where the editor only requested changes in formatting. It was ready for acceptance (possibly delayed by the reviewer, causing a delay of over half a month).
On March 21st, officially accepted.
On March 29th, proofread and it was published online the same evening.

观天澜 2022-03-26

Only one expert's opinion, rejected yesterday.

小图 2022-03-24

The text in English would be "There is a process called peer review."

leo07 2022-03-21

Excuse me, is this journal in the peer review status?

小图 2022-03-20

It took a total of 4 months from start to finish. After submitting the manuscript, it took 1 and a half months to receive major revisions, including two major revisions and one minor revision. After spending 1 month on revisions, it took another month for the manuscript to be reviewed again, this time for minor revisions. After 20 days of making the necessary changes, the manuscript was resubmitted. Following a half-month review process, the manuscript was accepted pending final approval. After 2 days of making additional revisions, the manuscript was accepted. Many thanks to Professor T. Pradeep and best wishes for the continued success of the journal.

一个魄罗 2022-03-19

It has been a month since my second trial, and there is still no news.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now