Verified Reviews - IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

kay 2022-10-16

Submitted in early August, the review comments were given in mid-October. However, there were 10 reviewers!!!! Why are there so many? I am working on multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms. The comments from junior colleagues were relatively mild, but senior colleagues had some areas where consensus was formed in this field that I think don't need explanation, but they expressed doubts and some were harsh. Does anyone have recommendations for other journals? I am planning to submit elsewhere after making the necessary revisions. It is really difficult to handle conflicting opinions from 10 reviewers, even though their suggestions do improve the article.

fighting1111 2022-10-08

Hello, is there any tnnls submission group? Can you please let me know? I am hesitating whether to urge or not.

darren_heu 2022-10-06

The submission made in June is still under review, and I am contemplating whether to send a reminder for it.

一丛一簇 2022-10-05

Submitted on August 12th, there are still no results.

gumpsky 2022-10-04

The submission made on August 10th was rejected today. It seems that two assistant editors, as well as one reviewer, provided their opinions. Both assistant editors recommended rejection, while surprisingly, the reviewer's opinion was not harsh. I feel that both the reviewer and assistant editors provided valuable feedback. I currently have a few doubts: 1. I have noticed that in the group, reviews usually take a long time, but my paper was rejected after only two months. Does this mean that there are significant issues with my manuscript? Although I have always believed that our paper has a clear structure and good ideas. 2. If I make the necessary revisions to address the issues in the manuscript, is there a high chance of rejection if I resubmit? According to the editor's comments, the journal has a high volume of submissions, all of which are of exceptional quality. I kindly request experienced advice.

ccyyqqq 2022-09-15

9 is too many, May I ask what suggestions AE gave?

BobBob 2022-09-09

9 reviewers...

fuzzysets 2022-09-08

This journal is becoming more and more difficult! In May, I only had one article accepted, and the entire process had four reviewers. The first review required major revisions, the second review required minor revisions, and the third review accepted the article.

In June, I submitted another article and unexpectedly had nine reviewers, breaking the record. Although there were many positive comments, it was ultimately rejected.

BobBob 2022-08-31

Just reply to the email.

xjp99v5 2022-08-30

I am also a reject and resubmit. May I ask how to attach the paper number and response letter?

Pisc 2022-07-04

From July last year to July this year, two rounds of revisions, Accept!

荣耀 2022-06-22

You're still early, it's not even 7 months yet. I've been waiting for almost a year and haven't had the first trial yet.

cutelad 2022-06-21

Posted on December 24, 2021, I have not received the result of the first review yet. I emailed the editor and received a reply stating that it is still in the review process. The peer review is really slow, I could have submitted to two other journals by now.

ticky_yan 2022-05-25

How long did it take for you to receive the first round review result after sending the email? I consulted the editor-in-chief last week and received the same answer.

jianzhengming 2022-05-25

The first trial took 7 and a half months, while the second trial only took one month to be recorded. It is estimated that several reminder letters were sent during the first trial, which significantly accelerated the speed of the second trial.

plzhai 2022-05-17

Overall, it is a better investment. It is a good magazine in District One, and I encourage investing more.

荣耀 2022-05-15

It has been 8 months since the submission, and I have not yet received the first review result. I am looking forward to a positive outcome!

bigcircle 2022-05-15

In March 2021, I had a paper reviewed, which went through three rounds of review, with two rounds resulting in a Reject & Resubmit decision.

BobBob 2022-04-28

It has been a month since I received it, but no construction has started yet. ┭┮﹏┭┮

追梦咸鱼 2022-04-28

Is there hope when given the opportunity to make changes? Have you just received an editing email?

BobBob 2022-04-28

The modification suggestions are a bit difficult to handle. Is it necessary to make further changes and resubmit?

浪里小花猫 2022-04-27

The journal has a high level of professionalism, and the editors and reviewers treat the manuscripts with great rigor. I may have been unlucky as I received feedback from seven reviewers in the first round, totaling nearly 70 comments. I wrote a response of over 60 pages. Going through two rounds of "reject and resubmit," each review process took over two months, resulting in a total of 10 months.

chenzhangzhe 2022-04-27

How are you doing now?

Rooookie 2022-04-16

Pure CV direction, not conference to journal. First review lasted for 14 months, with two review results, one acceptance and one rejection, and the final result was direct rejection. The review comments were not helpful and directly limited the innovation. After inquiring from multiple sources, it was found that having a famous researcher as a co-author would expedite the process, while a smaller research group would be slower. It is urgent to graduate, so be cautious in submitting articles with fewer publications and in submitting to non-top conferences. The method is already outdated compared to the latest ones, which means that the article has been rendered useless.

jianzhengming 2022-04-09

It has been two weeks since the last inquiry about the status of the EIC manuscript "Make AE Recommendation". Should I ask again?

jianzhengming 2022-04-09

29-Sep-2021 Submitted
30-Sep-2021--until now Under Review
PS: 30-Mar-2022: Consulted EIC, who said the status changed to "Make AE Recommendation," but still shows as "Under Review" in my submission system.

赶紧发论文 2022-04-09

31-Mar-2022 under review - This means that something is currently being examined or evaluated as of March 31, 2022.

09-Apr-2022 eic adm - This phrase is not clear and may require more context to accurately translate.

wqfjnu 2022-04-07

2021.9.24 Submitted
2021.9.29 EIC ADM Under Review
2021.12.30 Reject & Resubmit
2022.1.28 Revision Submitted
2022.4.1 Accept

Translation:
2021.9.24 Submitted
2021.9.29 Editor-in-Chief (EIC) Associate Editor Decision Made, Under Review
2021.12.30 Reject & Resubmit
2022.1.28 Revision Submitted
2022.4.1 Accept

yangyangde 2022-04-01

How many states are there in total?

zzkkzz 2022-03-30

Just submitted, and the number has already exceeded 20,000. Does it mean that over 20,000 manuscripts have been accepted for the year 2022 already? It's only been three months!

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started