一切加油鸭 2022-01-02

20211130 submitted
20211220 major revision (Three reviewers: one minor revision - 4 questions, one major revision - 5 questions, one outright acceptance) Overall, the feedback is very positive, and the questions are not tricky.
20211224 revision submitted
20211226 pending editor decision
20211230 accepted
20220101 proof

敲敲跑跑泡泡鸡 2021-11-29

2021-10-29 Submission
2021-11-10 Received revision comments
2021-11-19 Received second round of revision comments
2021-11-22 Paper accepted
The review process was extremely fast, and the two reviewers were also very professional and responsible. They provided about fifteen suggestions, which were very helpful. Students who are in a hurry to graduate can consider this option!

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

Brother, just like you, did you end up recording it?

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

After submission, the manuscript undergoes a major revision following the reviews of two reviewers. The status then changes to "waiting for editor's decision." It is now in the "Revised version review" stage. Is there still a need for significant modifications in your case?

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

After submission, the manuscript undergoes major revisions following the evaluation of two reviewers. The status then changes to "awaiting editor decision". It has now changed to "Revised version review". What is going on? Are there still many issues?

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

After submission, the article went through major revisions following the evaluation of two reviewers. The status then changed to "waiting for editorial decision." It is currently under "revised version review." Do I need to make further modifications? Is it still possible to be rejected?

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

After submission, the paper underwent major revisions following the evaluations of two reviewers. The status then changed to "waiting for editorial decision" and now it has become a "Revised version review." Has anyone else had a similar experience as mine?

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

After being reviewed by two referees and undergoing major revisions, the status has changed to "waiting for editor's decision." Now it has become a "revised version review." Is there any hope in this situation? Has anyone had a similar experience as mine?

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

After submission, the manuscript received major revisions from two reviewers. After making the necessary modifications and resubmitting, the editor decided to change the status to "Revised version review." Does this mean there is still a chance?

qinshanming0210 2021-11-22

The text has been reviewed and revised.

。。 2021-11-15

Hello, have you received the revised comments now? How long does it usually take to receive them under review?

leexuguang 2021-11-10

Do you have a receipt for receiving the article? I received a receipt for receiving it, but it only shows EI retrieval on it.

leexuguang 2021-11-10

Do you have a receipt after receiving the article? Why does my receipt only show EI retrieval?

KeyDI 2021-11-08

Is a review article good for publication? What should be considered in a review article? Does it have to be written by a top expert to be considered good enough?

Douglas_YU 2021-11-04

How much is the layout fee generally?

wendell99 2021-10-31

Received: 23 August 2019 / Revised: 9 October 2019 / Accepted: 11 October 2019 / Published: 14 October 2019

Translated: This text was received on August 23, 2019, revised on October 9, 2019, accepted on October 11, 2019, and published on October 14, 2019.

xufan 2021-10-29

May I ask, do I need to apply for a card to use PayPal? How does the usage process work?

wmt 2021-10-28

"Using PayPal is the cheapest option."

xufan 2021-10-27

It is the fastest journal in terms of efficiency that I have ever seen. Submitted on August 26th, accepted on October 27th, with one major revision and one minor revision for a single issue.
By the way, I would like to ask everyone, which credit card offers a lower exchange rate when paying the publication fee? I want to save some money.

潇洒七星 2021-10-27

On October 16th, the article was resubmitted again.

On October 18th, the assistant editor replied and stated that they sent the defense email to two academic editors. Both academic editors agreed that the defense was reasonable and decided to reprocess the manuscript. The status of the manuscript changed from "reject" to "pending editor decision." They also asked if I could withdraw the resubmitted manuscript. At this point, I felt that things were turning around and I expressed my gratitude in the email and requested to withdraw the resubmitted manuscript (which was actually just a minor modification).

On October 19th, I received an email notification stating that the acceptance was approved.

On October 25th, it was published online. Done.

潇洒七星 2021-10-27

10.8 The submission was rejected, and the reason was that one of the reviewers, who had the most relevant professional background, rejected the paper twice. They need to respect the reviewers. The comments mentioned that my responses did not completely address the reviewer's questions. However, they also took into consideration the opinions of other reviewers and the improvements made to the manuscript. They encouraged making significant revisions and resubmission.

10.14 Considering resubmission, on one hand, I am worried about the long wait time as I need to use it. On the other hand, I am afraid that it will be sent to the same reviewer who rejected it before. Therefore, I prepared in two ways. One is to prepare for revising and resubmitting, and the other is to send an email to the assistant editor and the office of academic editors to express regret and respect. I reiterated the significant efforts made previously and emphasized that other reviewers provided acceptance suggestions. Then, I refuted each of the rejected reviewer's questions and cited literature as evidence. Lastly, I politely requested whether they could reconsider the handling decision for the manuscript and asked if there were any better suggestions due to the time constraint.

10.16 The article was resubmitted again.

qingruoren 2021-10-24

September 12, 2021: Submitted
October 11, 2021: Major revision
October 18, 2021: Revised
October 22, 2021: Minor revision
October 24, 2021: Accepted

qinshanming0210 2021-10-22

How are you doing? I am also very anxious and have no response.

一定要中 2021-10-19

2021.10.19投出 translates to "Submitted on October 19, 2021" in English.

tt0000000 2021-10-12

To check for plagiarism, below 20%.

tt0000000 2021-10-12

September 9th, submitted;
September 23rd, 2 reviewers: major revisions (eliminated the review of the 3rd reviewer);
October 7th, revised;
October 9th, 2nd reviewer pointed out 2 minor issues;
October 10th, revised;
October 12th, accepted.

球毕业 2021-10-09

2021.9.20 submitted to Journal
2021.9.20 Under Review
2021.10.9 Under Review (status unchanged)
I emailed to inquire about the progress, and the editor said that they did not receive enough review comments. The average review time on the official website is claimed to be 14 days, but the Romanian editor, during this period, asked for a change of email address. It's not as fast as rumored! I need to graduate soon, so I need to have at least 2 months left.

瓜大瓜瓜 2021-10-08

I guess that applying for withdrawal and then resubmitting is to shorten the review period of this article in the submission system.

潇洒七星 2021-10-08

Still no notification given, still pending editor decision.

潇洒七星 2021-09-30

Submission on August 20th.
Major revision on September 4th, three reviewers, one gave a negative evaluation, one gave a positive evaluation, and one gave a neutral evaluation.
Revised version returned on September 14th.
On September 16th, the reviewer of the third neutral evaluation gave a "yes," and the status changed to "pending editor decision." It has been 14 days now, anxiously waiting~~~