Verified Reviews - Food & Function
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

我是一一 2021-09-21

Is there any result now? Mine has been four days and there is still no movement.

AL0809 2021-09-13

I am also like this. I don't know how long ago you updated your information at that time?

MacroDou888 2021-09-02

The relationship with the reviewers is crucial. Submitted on April 24th, received revisions on July 20th, resubmitted revisions on July 29th, and still in the peer review process until now. Good luck to everyone, hope we all get our articles accepted.

少爷 2021-09-01

I was lucky and returned in less than a month, about 20 or so days. Since you have so much time, you can politely send an email to remind.

xxzm 2021-08-28

May I ask how long will the first review take? It has been two months since I submitted my manuscript and it is still in peer review. Can I send an email to inquire about the status?

少爷 2021-08-27

Submitted in June 2021, and returned in July for minor revisions. Online publication scheduled for early August.

审稿人爸爸放过我 2021-08-07

Thank you. May I ask if the original data is what they requested or if it was provided voluntarily?

萨达姆 2021-08-05

Sent for external review for two months, one reviewer kept saying that it was unrelated to this journal and recommended a change. However, the editor still gave a chance and accepted it five days after revisions were made. To be fair, the speed was quite fast.

萨达姆 2021-08-05

Sent for external review for two months, submitted on April 27th or 28th, and by July it already showed major revisions. One reviewer said it was not relevant to this journal and suggested a change. However, the editor still gave an opportunity, and after revisions, it was accepted within five days. To be fair, the process was quite fast.

马頔冲鸭 2021-08-01

Is there direct proof online?

不太拗口的科研小白名 2021-07-31

I gave three to four repeated jumps, which I had prepared beforehand when conducting the experiment. In fact, for a magazine in the first district, it is definitely required to upload the original WB image, so preparation is definitely necessary.

审稿人爸爸放过我 2021-07-29

Hello, may I ask what kind of raw data does WB need? Should I submit all three repetitions?

审稿人爸爸放过我 2021-07-29

Hello, may I ask if only the first image is required for uploading the original data, or all the pictures? What kind of original data does WB need? Do we need to submit all three duplicates?

xxzm 2021-07-28

After my submission, it has changed three times. It changes approximately every week. It is currently still in peer review. I hope to have results soon.

不太拗口的科研小白名 2021-07-27

Yes, there was a change, so the first trial took a bit long.

xxzm 2021-07-27

When you were conducting the external audit, did you switch between "with editor" and "in peer review"?

不太拗口的科研小白名 2021-07-27

Posted on May 19th, I had to supplement the WB raw data directly because the article involved WB. I returned after a week, then sent it for review in another week. It took three weeks to receive the comments for major revisions, which mainly answered some questions and made formatting modifications. I returned it within 5 days. After two to three weeks, it was accepted directly and published on the third day after acceptance. Overall, the process was very fast. It was my first SCI paper as a master's student, and I got it accepted with just one submission. In fact, as long as the experimental design in the preliminary stage is reasonable, there is no need to supplement experiments during the later submission. On the other hand, another SCI paper keeps getting rejected and requiring additional experiments, which is very frustrating.

太白真猪 2021-07-20

7.7 Submission
7.14 Initial assessment
7.14 with editor
7.17 In peer review
Looking forward to the reviewer's comments, hoping for acceptance.

aaperocky 2021-07-19

It has been a week since I submitted, and it is still checking submission and files. Does anyone know what's going on with this?

马頔冲鸭 2021-07-14

Hello, may I ask if WB needs to submit three parallel sets of data?

马頔冲鸭 2021-07-14

Hello, may I ask if the original data of WB needs to be submitted in triplicate?

马頔冲鸭 2021-07-14

Hello, may I ask if the original needs to be submitted in triplicate?

xxzm 2021-07-04

May I ask how long this condition has lasted for you? I am also experiencing the same thing.

糊歌 2021-06-10

Hello, how long has it been since you were with the editor? My status has been like this for 10 days.

probiotic yang 2021-05-20

2021.3.18 Manuscript submitted
2021.4.5 Reject and resubmission
2021.4.16 Resubmitted
2021.5.3 Minor revision
2021.5.4 Minor revision submitted
2021.5.18 Accepted.
The process took a total of 2 months, which was quite fast. The journal is excellent.

小跟班 2021-04-28

It has been 3 days since I submitted it, but it is still checking submission and files. I don't know what's going on.

花儿节节高 2021-04-16

I want to ask the author, which editor did you choose? I also have a submission request recently, but I don't know which editor to choose. I seek the author's advice.

zoucunao 2021-04-07

The components of the extract are not clear.

百发百中鸭 2021-04-01

Hello, I am preparing to submit to Food & Function magazine recently, but there is a confusing requirement. The original description is as follows: Studies involving extracts Manuscripts submitted to Food & Function without a characterization of extracts will not be considered for publication.... (The text is limited and not complete). Can I ask you for the meaning of this paragraph?

好好科研 2021-03-30

About a week.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More