Verified Reviews - Food & Function
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

萧志格 2022-06-13

After you accept, how long does it take to proof? Or is there no proofing step?

幸运加运气 2022-06-02

The editing is very good, and the suggestions are also very fair. After the major revision, it was accepted, and I am very grateful to the editor. However, the time did indeed take a bit long.

幸运加运气 2022-05-30

I would like to ask, it has been a whole month since the major revision was submitted. After a brief period with the editor, it is currently in peer review. I'm wondering when we can expect the results. I'm quite anxious about it. How about you, my friends?

samvel 2022-05-27

What is this raw data?

samvel 2022-05-27

Ah, me too. I submitted mine on the 16th. Today, I saw it was under review. I don't know how long it will take, sigh.

mafegqiu06 2022-05-18

2022.05.03 - First submission
2022.0504 - Need raw data
2022.0507 - Resubmission
2022.0517 - With editor
I hope there will be good news next, as it is related to my Ph.D. application. Wish me luck!

mafegqiu06 2022-05-18

2022.05.03 First submission
2022.0504 Need raw data
2022.0507 Resubmission
2022.0527 with editor
I hope there will be good news next. It's related to my Ph.D. application. Wish me good luck!

幸运加运气 2022-05-16

May I ask, why are you so fast, colleague?

太白真猪 2022-02-16

I may not necessarily find another reviewer, mine did not find one either.

幸运加运气 2022-02-15

To be honest, I'm quite anxious. I have previously submitted to this magazine and I didn't have to wait this long before. I quickly received feedback within around 4 months. But now, after submitting, I have been waiting for 4 months without knowing what's going on. I'm really worried.

幸运加运气 2022-02-15

I would like to ask how everyone's articles are doing. I've already submitted mine four months ago and it has been going back and forth between "with editor" and "in peer review" without any feedback. I'm very anxious. Has anyone else experienced such a long waiting time? I'm extremely worried.

tao1885144 2022-01-08

May I ask, for this magazine, if a manuscript is rejected after more than two months of review, and the author requests to resubmit, will a new reviewer be assigned to review it again?

四毛 2022-01-07

The major has changed to medicine, not agriculture and forestry, so the area has been reduced.

桔梗花 2022-01-06

Food Function Magazine has been reclassified into Zone 2 recently.

太白真猪 2022-01-05

First submission
7.7.21 First submission
8.8.21 Feedback received, rejection with a request for resubmission, two reviewers provided feedback
10.24.21 Resubmitted after making revisions according to the reviewers' feedback
11.2.21 Initial assessment
11.2.21 With editor
11.4.21 In peer review
12.11.21 Accepted
12.15.21 First publication
Overall, the process was quite fast, and the journal has a good impact!

Iris-always 2021-12-27

8.21投 - 8.21 Submission
8.31 editor
9.1 送审 - 9.1 Under review
9.11 editor
9.14 再送审 - 9.14 Resubmission
9.26 editor
9.30 再送审 - 9.30 Resubmission
10.17 major revision
11.11 accepted

Doctor.W 2021-12-21

Hello, the proofreading process will take approximately two weeks from the time of receiving.

dandan923824 2021-12-20

After 50 days, it was directly accepted. I resubmitted and conducted additional experiments, and replied to the reviewer's comments one by one.

xc041 2021-12-18

Why does the editor not send it in his hands for a long time?

幸运加运气 2021-12-18

May I ask what is your research direction? Which editor is handling it? How come yours is so fast? Why is ours comparatively slow? After submission, it started with the editor again, and it has already been with the editor for nearly 3 weeks.

幸运加运气 2021-12-18

dandan923824, may I ask about your results?

太白真猪 2021-12-14

I would like to ask, how long after receiving will the proofreading notification be sent?

HERO.Wei 2021-12-10

I received the notice of acceptance for the review article this morning. The whole process took exactly two months. Here is a timeline of the submission for everyone to refer to:

10.09: Submitted to the journal
10.16: Under review
11.18: Major revision
11.28: Submitted the revision
12.07: Minor revision
12.09: Submitted the revision
12.09: Accepted (received on the same day)

There were two reviewers in total who provided constructive comments to make the article more complete. The editor also handled the process very quickly. I am very satisfied!

LoveJeff 2021-11-23

It has been 8 days for me, still checking submission and files.

dandan923824 2021-11-22

I am too. Are you submitting for the first time? I am resubmitting, and it has been over 3 weeks with the editor, Monica Galleano. Which editor did you choose? Does the speed of handling the manuscript depend on the editor?

幸运加运气 2021-11-20

Dear experts, my article has been with the editor for some time now, about 25 days, and it has remained in this status without any update. I would like to ask when did you all receive the next step's notification? Thank you very much for your guidance.

dandan923824 2021-11-16

Did you resubmit it for review after you edited it?

大红帽 2021-10-09

2021-05-25 Submission
2021-06-13 Rejected and asked for revisions, two reviewers provided a lot of comments
2021-08-18 Resubmitted after revisions
2021-09-19 Accepted
It is an excellent journal, currently in the top tier with an impact factor of 5+. It is very friendly, and our laboratory often submits to it. The acceptance rate is high, and the review process is also quite fast. Articles with certain innovation are relatively easy to be accepted.

我是一一 2021-09-21

May I ask what the result was later? How long after was the status updated?

我是一一 2021-09-21

Is there any result yet? Mine has also been submitted for a long time and it has been continuously checking submission and files.

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started