Verified Reviews - Advanced Energy Materials
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

weiwubuqu2015 2022-11-14

Post on November 14, 2022, hoping for smoothness!

lithiumer 2022-10-31

29th October 2022, transfer pending.

半颗糖 2022-10-28

2022-10-19 Manuscript submitted
2022-10-27 With editor (09:39 a.m.)
2022-10-27 Under review (16:20 p.m.)
Review written by a novice PhD, without involving any experts, unexpectedly sent for review...

低空飞行 2022-10-27

2022.10.25 Submission

lithiumer 2022-10-25

25 Oct 2022, avec éditeur translates to "25 Oct 2022, with editor" in English.

lithiumer 2022-10-24

May I ask how things are going for the original poster?

lithiumer 2022-10-24

May I ask the original poster, how long ago did you have any updates?

lithiumer 2022-10-24

18 Oct 2022, manuscript submitted

sci-da 2022-10-14

Hello, is there any change in the status?

耀华 2022-10-12

The summary on electrocatalytic conversion was submitted on October 9th.

第二性原理@xf 2022-10-06

What happened? Did it get killed? How long until the status is updated?

第二性原理@xf 2022-10-06

It has been 8 days since submission, is the status still "manuscript submitted"? Has it not reached the editor yet?

规律作息勤锻炼 2022-09-12

The previous EES submission received three positive opinions and one negative opinion, which was rejected by the editor. The negative issue was tricky and difficult to respond to. After making comprehensive revisions based on the feedback, I submitted it to AEM. Surprisingly, it only took two days for the review process, and the reviewers only requested modifications. After replying promptly, the revised paper was quickly accepted. The whole process took less than a month. I am grateful for the efficient work of the editor and reviewers.

catator 2022-08-25

Hello, has the status changed later? It has been over a week for me and it is still the same. Could it be that the system hasn't updated the status?

catator 2022-08-25

Hello, has your condition changed later? It has been over a week for me and I am still in the same state. Could it be that the system hasn't updated the status yet?

baobao-xiaowang 2022-08-12

Okay, check the message, teacher.

腾腾就是我 2022-08-12

Congratulations, your article has been accepted. I have added you as a friend on Letpub and hope you agree. I would like to ask you some questions regarding submission. Thank you.

baobao-xiaowang 2022-08-12

Wait patiently, no need to hurry, good luck.

腾腾就是我 2022-08-12

You reviewed it so quickly. We have been with the editor for half a month already, with no news. At the same time, I would like to have the opportunity to read your article.

baobao-xiaowang 2022-08-12

Group Review (non-invited)
5.1 Submitted
5.9 With editor
5.10 Under review
6.4 Major revision
7.1 Revision submitted
7.11 Accept

Good start, keep it up. Hope to have one research paper accepted by AEM during the doctoral period.

醉翁 2022-08-02

Can I ask if there are any updates on the status?

醉翁 2022-08-02

Has the status been updated now? It has been about a week, and mine has been in this state as well.

BEIBEI0016 2022-07-25

Is there a continuation?
Is it because the magazine is not updating anymore?

腾腾就是我 2022-07-23

Same. Manuscript submitted for one week and still no response.

糖糖糖123456 2022-07-22

Submitted on 7.12, it is still a manuscript submitted. Wasn't it said that the efficiency of the journal is high? This is too slow.

王若阳 2022-07-21

May I ask if this status is "unassigned for editing" or "still in the editor's hands before submission"?

一叶知秋 2022-07-20

It has been 10 days since submission, and it is still marked as "manuscript submitted." It's really slow.

NE-NC 2022-07-15

How long does it take for this journal to decide whether to send it for review recently?

madandan123 2022-05-25

2021.11.24 First submission
2021.12.23 Received review comments for the first submission, 3 major revisions, 1 rejection. The rejection was based on unreasonable comments from the reviewer who clearly did not read our work, as we addressed the mentioned issues in the main body of the paper. The editor ultimately rejected it. We are not satisfied and will appeal.
2022.01.20 First round of appeal, resubmitted, editor agreed to re-review.
2022.03.16 Received comments from the second round of review, 2 accepted, 1 minor revision, 1 rejection. The editor ultimately gave a major revision decision.
2022.03.22 Uploaded the revised manuscript for the second round.
2022.04.08 Received comments from the third round, 2 new reviewers joined, 2 accepted, 3 rejected. One of the rejecters claimed our work was nonsense and suggested we do some useful research without providing specific modification suggestions. The editor ultimately decided to transfer the paper.
2022.04.20 We are not satisfied and filed a second appeal. Thank you to editor Sai Kishore Ravi for giving us another opportunity for review!
2022.04.28 Received comments from the fourth round, one reviewer still insisted on rejecting the paper and provided some suggestions. However, we have already addressed these suggestions in the main body of the paper. The other three reviewers agreed to accept the paper. The editor gave a minor revision decision.
2022.05.19 Uploaded the revised manuscript for the fourth round.
2022.05.24 Accept

南大张学友 2022-04-23

Rejected on April 21st, speechless, one revision after another, with no clear stance indicated. The reason for rejection by the reviewer is that I added MWNT and binder without mentioning them in the main text, making it difficult for others to replicate. Quite amusing.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started