SeeitinYourEyes 2022-01-11

Submission will be reviewed one week after submission. Minor revisions will be made three weeks later based on the review comments. The revised version will be resubmitted one month later. The review comments will be revised again two weeks later. The revised version will be resubmitted on the same day. Acceptance will be confirmed two weeks later.

随风飘扬 2022-01-09

It has been a month, and there is no news.

jun1 2022-01-06

Recently it's been a bit slow, it's been seven days and there still hasn't been an assigned editor. Can't afford to delay any longer.

shang 2022-01-04

Why was sustainability rejected? Do you have any understanding of the reasons?

han1 2022-01-04

May I ask how long it takes for the status to change after you submit for review?

han1 2021-12-22

Hello, may I ask if you have preprinted? Are there any disadvantages if you have done so?

han1 2021-12-22

Hello, may I ask if you have preprinted it?

山山与花花 2021-12-19

Solved an engineering problem in the field of metal materials that everyone has been trying to solve for more than a decade, but none of the solutions were perfect, using a very simple method. The article does not mention any experts. When submitted, it was rejected by the editor within 5 days, citing the reason of not having enough remarkable progress.

还没想好叫啥子 2021-12-14

It has been more than ten days since submission, and the editor requested a reporting summary. Does this mean it has been sent for review?

奔跑的竹子 2021-12-13

Already submitted, looking forward to good luck.

447281304 2021-12-13

Acceptance of the third round.
Acceptance: 30th November 21.
Manuscript under consideration: 30th November 21.
Editor Assigned: 23rd November 21.
Manuscript submitted: 23rd November 21.
Submission in process: 23rd November 21.

After modifying the chart format and language according to the editor's requirements, it was officially accepted one week after submission.

Subsequently, the APC (Article Processing Charge) for the OA (Open Access) journal needs to be paid. Payment cannot be made online with a Visa credit card from the Bank of China if it exceeds $5,000 (regardless of credit limit). The offline payment method of invoice is chosen, and a representative from Beijing Zhongke Import and Export Company will contact for payment through corporate transfer in Chinese yuan, and a Chinese VAT invoice can be issued.

Proof invited: 10th December 21.

447281304 2021-12-13

Second round, all three reviewers agree to accept, editor gives accept in principle.

447281304 2021-12-13

First Round
Major Revision - 9th June 21
Manuscript under consideration - 3rd June 21
Review Complete - 3rd June 21
All Reviewers Assigned - 3rd May 21
Manuscript under consideration - 29th April 21
Contacting Potential Reviewers - 29th April 21
Manuscript under consideration - 12th April 21
Editor Assigned - 12th April 21
Manuscript submitted - 10th April 21
Submission in process - 10th April 21
Three reviewers provided positive feedback but requested additional data, allowing six months for revision.

huang3 2021-12-10

Final notice, how long did it take for you to submit for review?

ustcucbku 2021-12-05

Second round:
Manuscript submitted on xx th Sep 21
Editor assigned on 24th Sep 21
Manuscript under consideration on 27th Sep 21
All reviewers assigned on 27th Sep 21
Review complete on 6th Oct 21
Manuscript under consideration on 6th Oct 21
Decision sent to author on 15th Oct 21

Third round:
Fifteen days after submission, under consideration, accepted on the same day.

ustcucbku 2021-12-05

First round
Manuscript submitted on xx th Feb 21
Editor Assigned on 26th Feb 21
Manuscript under consideration on 26th Feb 21
Contacting Potential Reviewers on 2nd Mar 21
All Reviewers Assigned on 6th Mar 21
Review Complete on 25th Mar 21
Manuscript under consideration on 25th Mar 21
Decision sent to author on 26th Apr 21

jincheng1 2021-11-23

Submitted status after 6 days of submission.

化学小白白 2021-11-14

How long does it usually take to reject a submission?

化学小白白 2021-11-14

What changes are there for the review? Is the email sent to the boss or the author?

化学小白白 2021-11-14

Brother, how many days does it usually take for review? It's been my sixth day and it's still in the status below. Is it a lost cause?

化学小白白 2021-11-14

May I ask how many days have passed since the submission for review? Today is the sixth day, and it is still in the status below. Does it mean that it has been rejected?

沉默是今晚的康桥 2021-11-12

I would like to ask, has the status changed after receiving the review email? It has been three weeks since I received the review email, but it is still under consideration. Is this normal?

沉默是今晚的康桥 2021-11-12

I want to ask, has the status changed after receiving the review email? It has been three weeks since I received the review email, but it is still under consideration. Is this normal?

Joey_IOP 2021-11-10

First submission to Nature Materials was rejected by the editor and was advised to submit to Nature Communications.
Manuscript under consideration: 26th July 2021
Manuscript submitted: 3rd June 2021
Received reviewer comments at the end of July. Two reviewers suggested major revisions and acceptance, while one reviewer rejected the manuscript. After conducting additional experiments and making major revisions, the manuscript was resubmitted.
Manuscript under consideration: 23rd October 2021
Manuscript submitted: 1st October 2021
After one month, all three reviewers agreed to accept the manuscript. The overall process was relatively fast, and there was a high demand for the comprehensiveness of the article.

Eyes on me 2021-10-31

You should see the advantages of Little NC, advocating OA, advocating that all reviewers can choose to be anonymous or not, and making all review comments and responses public. It is committed to promoting fairness and transparency in academia. Let's wait until I publish a piece of work before saying anything else. The work above is still good. Comprehensive journals should not be evaluated casually.

Eyes on me 2021-10-31

Submitted to Nature, rejected after major revisions... (Possibly the work is not comprehensive enough, otherwise there is still hope) I thought they would recommend Nat Catal., but the editor directly recommended Nat Commun. I didn't want to bother anymore. Three reviewers, one acceptance, two minor revisions. Still, I am grateful for the more than 30 comments from the Nature reviewers, which helped improve the article.
Hope Nat. Commun. gets better and more people cite it.

沉默是今晚的康桥 2021-10-20

May I ask why the website's status has not changed (still under consideration) even after receiving the review email? What is the situation?

ZSNNN 2021-10-10

Someone is really obsessed. They will feel unbalanced if they can't post. They might have a mental illness.

酷拉皮卡丘 2021-09-23

I would like to ask if the original poster still has the template link. I noticed that it is already expired now.

sci_learn 2021-09-14

The NC template address is:
https://mianbaoduo.com/o/bread/mbd-YZuampxv