Verified Reviews - APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

ttit 2021-09-02

2021.7.25 Submitted
2021.8.7 under review
2021.8.29 required reviews completed
2021.9.1 rejected
Three reviewers, the first two didn't have any negative comments, the third one directly stated, "The new information in this paper is poor. The reviewer cannot suggest it for acceptance."
The review process was fast, wishing you all the best!

真理 2021-09-01

August 31st, under review, there has been a change in the date. It should be that feedback has been received.

keyan111167 2021-08-31

7.7 submit
7.9 with editor
7.18 under review
7.28 under review
8.31 reject

During my doctoral period, I was accepted twice by ATE, and I felt that it was a perfect fit and highly recognized this journal. I have also witnessed the growth of the journal's impact factor along the way.
This is the third time I have submitted, and compared to the second time, it has clearly been expedited.
There were three reviewers, and the third reviewer rejected it, while the first two reviewers suggested major revisions. The editor ultimately rejected it.
Although it was rejected, I gained a lot from it, receiving a total of over 30 comments, which were very thorough.
I will submit again!

王琮瑜 2021-08-25

Direction for the Flexible Operation of Thermal Power Plants
14 January 2021. Submitted to journal
16 January 2021. With editor
18 January 2021. Under review
20 February 2021. Major revision (6 reviewers, 2 rejections, 4 major revisions, editor provided opportunity for modifications)
16 March 2021. Submitted to journal (modifications sent back)
25 April 2021. Accepted (all 5 reviewers agreed to accept, 6th reviewer did not respond)
The review process for ATE journal in this field takes about a month. The editor is particularly diligent and responsible. The impact factor for this year is 5.295. Best wishes for the continuous success of ATE!

真理 2021-08-24

Finally submitted for review
August 24th Under review

真理 2021-08-17

August 5th submitted
August 8th with editor
August 10th until now with editor
Why is ATE so slow? I heard that now it takes about a month to be with editor. I asked several people and they all said it's the same. ATE used to be fast, I don't know what's happening now. Is anyone else in the same situation?

橙子强 2021-08-01

2021.04.29 submitted to journal - Submitted to journal on April 29, 2021.
2021.05.04 with editor - With editor on May 4, 2021.
2021.05.08 under review - Under review on May 8, 2021.
2021.05.28 under review - Under review on May 28, 2021.
2021.06.14 required reviews completed - Required reviews completed on June 14, 2021.
2021.06.15 decision in process - Decision in process on June 15, 2021.
2021.06.16 major revision - Major revision on June 16, 2021.
2021.07.14 revision submitted to journal - Revision submitted to journal on July 14, 2021.
2021.07.15 with editor - With editor on July 15, 2021.
2021.07.15 under review - Under review on July 15, 2021.
2021.07.30 decision in process - Decision in process on July 30, 2021.
2021.07.31 accept - Accepted on July 31, 2021.

As the second year of graduate school is coming to an end, I got a paper accepted in a Tier 2 journal. Thanks to Professor Bansal for the swift handling, the article was processed quickly. I wish the Association of Technology and Engineering (ATE) continuous success and hope it will soon be elevated to a Tier 1 journal.

appleman 2021-07-24

Hello, may I ask if your article has been submitted for review? I submitted mine on July 3rd and it is currently still with the editor.

33 2021-07-19

Posted on January 25th
Major revisions on May 10th
Revised and submitted on June 10th
Returned for minor revisions on July 8th, one reviewer requested the addition of two sentences
Revisions completed on July 10th
Accepted on July 17th

Jie_judy 2021-07-12

Hope to submit for review as soon as possible on 2021/07/06.

Sge5 2021-07-02

The paper went through two rounds of revisions and it took approximately four and a half months from submission to acceptance.
2/20: Submitted to journal
3/5: Under editor review
3/7: Under review
3/8: Under review
3/22: Under review
3/23: Under review
4/6: Required reviewers completed
4/8: Decision in process, revisions requested (from three reviewers with over 20 comments)
5/5: Submitted revised manuscript
5/6: Under editor review
5/7: Under review
5/28: Required reviewers completed
5/28: Decision in process
5/29: Decision made, revisions requested again
6/25: Submitted revised manuscript
6/27: Under editor review
6/28: Under review
7/1: Decision in process
7/1: Accepted
Overall, the efficiency of the editor-in-chief in handling the manuscript in ATE was very high. ATE is a good journal. Best wishes to all researchers for successful submissions!

CNS何时发 2021-06-30

Compared to other journals, the speed is relatively fast. This journal is very good. Submitted on Aug 11, 2020, received major revisions on Oct 14, 2020, and accepted on Jan 06, 2021.

lzjt 2021-05-20

The submission process took about 4 months in total. The manuscript was revised 3 times: one resubmission for formatting issues in the 1st review, major revisions in the 2nd review, and minor revisions in the 3rd review. The speed is still acceptable. I wish ATE further success.

2021-05-20

Hello, may I ask if this submission uses single column or double column? Is it the type with large line spacing?

朝花夕拾 2021-03-31

Hello! I'm not sure if you can see my message. I submitted an article called "ate" because it is my first time writing in English. After submitting, I realized there were some mistakes. I would like to know under what circumstances I can make a re-submission. I'm not sure how to proceed with the re-submission.

Schuvol 2021-02-25

To complain again, I don't know what kind of "fate" I have with the fourth reviewer. I encountered this person in the previous ECM, also from Turkey. The opinions given twice were exactly the same, and they both required adding a reference, specifically fourteen references each time. Checking this person's articles, they have hundreds of citations, probably all gained through this kind of approach.

hitzhwan 2021-02-05

2020.10.3 Submission
2020.12.16 Received major revision comments (took 73 days), deadline for return: 2021.1.20 (34 days)
2021.1.11 Returned major revision comments (took 25 days)
2021.1.31 Finally accepted (took 20 days)

dongdong355 2021-02-01

Whenever a reviewer accepts or returns comments, the "under review" time will change. Since my article has two reviewers, the time will change four times.

闲庭信步之叶 2021-01-29

May I ask what is the reason for the change in multiple "Under Review" times?

Olaf 2021-01-12

09.11 Submission;
11.10 First review comments, major revisions, 5 reviewers, 50 comments;
12.08 Resubmission of revised manuscript;
01.06 Accepted.

nope 2021-01-11

8.17 Submission
10.1 Major revisions, six reviewers, nearly a hundred comments,
11.5, submitted for initial review,
11.27, revised again, minor revisions
12.18, accepted
12.29, online
The process was quite tumultuous, but the outcome is still considered good.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now