Verified Reviews - APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

mjyang 2023-02-21

My under review took less than a month to complete the required reviews. I'm so nervous.

mjyang 2023-02-21

2023-02-21 Required Reviews Completed
Very anxious

符号 2023-02-17

Basically, it will be submitted for review in three to four days, the speed is very fast.

One_ 2023-02-14

2022.10.10 submitted - Submitted on October 10, 2022.
2022.10.30 Under review - Under review as of October 30, 2022.
2022.12.23 major revision - Major revision requested on December 23, 2022.
2023.1.25 revision submitted to the journal - Revision submitted to the journal on January 25, 2023.
2023.1.27 under review - Under review as of January 27, 2023.
2023.2.12 accept - Accepted on February 12, 2023.
The total duration was 4 months, with an editor and 4 reviewers. There were over 40 specific issues raised for revision, but the speed compared to other journals in the same field was acceptable. I will consider submitting to this journal again in the future. This process can serve as a reference for others.

戬云狂 2023-02-13

Update: accepted

mjyang 2023-02-13

2023-01-05 Submission;
2023-01-31 Under Review

戬云狂 2023-02-12

ATE is a well-established influential journal in the field of thermal/mechanical engineering. The constructive feedback provided in the review process greatly contributes to improving the quality of the articles. However, the only drawback is that the processing speed is extremely slow. The article was submitted in June 2022, received a major revision decision in November, submitted the revised version in December, received a minor revision decision in February, and the revisions were made promptly. Hopefully, the acceptance decision will be made soon.

dongdong355 2023-02-08

No need for all authors to confirm, this process does not affect the review, but can only be viewed in the submission system of the corresponding author. If confirmed, co-authors can also see the review status in their own submission system.

qazws 2023-01-28

Through his support center, ah.

Julie69 2023-01-27

Hello, may I ask how to contact customer service? I have submitted my application four months ago and have not received the first review yet.

qazws 2023-01-27

The speed is really too slow. It took a month for the submission to reach the editor for review. The review process lasted for three months, with a total of 5 reviewers' opinions. I was given one month to make revisions after receiving the comments. After completing the revisions, it took another month to send it back. Then, there was another month of waiting before it was sent for review again. However, the editor invited reviewers again, but no one accepted the invitation. I contacted customer service for assistance and they helped to urge the reviewers. Finally, the reviewers were invited again. It has been seven months since the submission, and it is still in the second review stage...

叶小乐 2023-01-19

Without being reviewed, the chances of getting a dip are basically slim. Either you write exceptionally well and don't need to be reviewed, or it will be rejected. 99% of the time, it is rejected. I suggest finding a new place.

何弃疗啊哥 2023-01-17

Today is 2023.1.17 and there is still no news, still dipping.

qilsky 2023-01-17

Excuse me, is there any result now?

qilsky 2023-01-17

Submitted on the 12th, still submitted now.

何弃疗啊哥 2023-01-13

Does "dip" mean rejection if the submission is not reviewed after being submitted?

何弃疗啊哥 2023-01-11

2022/12/30 Submitted to Journal
2023/1/4 With editor
2023/1/9 Decision in Process
The thermodynamics area of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has just been upgraded to Zone 1. I submitted my work there, hoping for good news. However, I have a feeling it might get rejected.

思燃siran 2023-01-05

11.03 decision in process
11.04 major revision
12.08 revision submitted to Journal
12.09 with editor
12.09 under review
1.03 decision in process
1.03 accept
The current problem is that there are still many emails in the proof stage that need to be forwarded to me... The boss doesn't mind having an extra article...

飞尚 2022-12-29

2022.12.16 submitted
2022.12.21 under review

Translation: The submission was made on December 16, 2022. It is currently under review as of December 21, 2022.

半缘y 2022-12-23

Submitted 12 Oct 2022
Decision in process 14 Nov 2022
Revised 6 Dec 2022
Accepted 20 Dec 2022

Translation:
Submitted 12 Oct 2022
Decision in process 14 Nov 2022
Revised 6 Dec 2022
Accepted 20 Dec 2022

Z.A. 2022-12-16

2022.04.29 submitted to journal
2022.10.17 major revision
2022.11.18 revision submit to journal
2022.11.20 with editor
2022.11.30 with editor
2022.12.01 Under review
2022.12.15 Review Complete
2022.12.15 Decision in process
2022.12.25 Decision in process
2023.01.03 Accept

Translated into English:

2022.04.29 submitted to journal
2022.10.17 major revision
2022.11.18 revision submitted to journal
2022.11.20 with editor
2022.11.30 with editor
2022.12.01 Under review
2022.12.15 Review Complete
2022.12.15 Decision in process
2022.12.25 Decision in process
2023.01.03 Accept

Wenray 2022-12-06

0812, submitted to journal
0816, with editor
0820, with editor
0904, under review
0905, under review
0916, under review
0927, under review
0928, under review
1009, under review
1012, under review
1101, required reviews completed
1101, decision in process
1114, revision submitted to journal
1116, under review
1129, under review
1204, decision in process
1205, accepted

2022-11-30

Have you submitted it for review? How long does it take to review?

derekx 2022-11-29

2022.6.1 submitted to journal
2022.6.3 with editor
2022.7.29 required reviews complete
2022.7.31 major revision (accepted by three out of four reviewers)
2022.9.3 revision submitted to journal
2022.9.4 with editor
2022.9.6 under review
2022.9.20 revision (two reviewers still have comments)
2022.9.22 revision submitted to journal
2022.9.23 with editor
2022.9.23 under review
2022.9.30 accepted
The process took nearly 4 months, with five reviewers in the initial review (including the editor, who provided detailed comments), totaling over forty suggestions. The comments were all very professional and helpful. This process serves as a reference for everyone, and I wish ATE continued success!

半缘y 2022-11-16

8.10 submitted
10.16 decision in process
11.16 reject
The manuscript review took two months, and the editorial decision took one month.

孤心无尘 2022-11-16

Submitted for 7 months, initially recommended for transfer by other journals. My research is on creep mechanics in the field of fluid-solid thermal dynamics, leaning more towards mechanics. I was initially surprised when it was sent for review, but after 7 months, it was rejected. The opinions of the three reviewers only focused on the first 1/3 of the article, not mentioning anything about the core content. The issues raised in the beginning were also trivial, making it difficult to understand the rest of the article. Were they just trying to stroke their ego with these minor details? Is this what they took 7 months for? If the article wasn't suitable, why was it sent for review? After 7 months, all they could come up with were a few sentences?

wendell99 2022-11-16

What's the reason for this? It has always been under external review.

ShanTongxin 2022-11-16

Hello, it has been two months since I submitted it, but the "under review" date keeps changing. May I ask if you know the reason for this?

wendell99 2022-11-15

2022.7.2 submitted to journal
2022.7.10 with editor
2022.7.17 under review (reviewed by five reviewers)
2022.8.21 required reviews complete
2022.8.24 major revision (accepted by three reviewers; two reviewers provided constructive feedback)
2022.9.15 Revision Submitted to Journal
2022.9.20 with editor
2022.9.15 1st revision
2022.9.24 under review
2022.11.11 required reviews complete (gentle reminder for reviews)
2022.11.15 accept

It took a little over four months for the process. The initial review involved six reviewers (including the editor, who provided symbolic feedback), with a total of over seventy comments. The response to the comments was around fifty pages long. This is my third manuscript accepted by ATE, and compared to the previous two times, the journal's handling efficiency was relatively slow. This process is provided as a reference for everyone!

Lucios 2022-11-14

I returned the decision to the editor after completing the review on October 5th, but until now, there has been no response.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started