RK5554 2023-04-06

I sent it for external review with editor for more than 10 hours.

木燚 2023-04-06

What's the result? Did you record it?

学术弟弟 2023-04-05

Can't even 8% do?

bill90 2023-04-04

3.17 submitted to journal
3.20 with editor
3.30 decision in process
4.4 rejected
There was a reminder sent in between, but it might have led to more rejection. Currently, the journal already has a high volume of submissions, and additionally, the reason for rejection was that the similarity score exceeded 8%. This journal has a strict requirement for plagiarism detection.

明亮阳光 2023-04-03

I think so too. Mine is also the same situation. If it hasn't been reviewed, it means it will be rejected, right?

ALLbeok 2023-04-03

Is mine also this situation? May I ask if it is going to be rejected?

cs97 2023-04-03

The more urgent, the easier to reject.

明亮阳光 2023-04-01

May I ask who is this editor?

bill90 2023-04-01

After more than 10 days, my application is still in the "decision in process" status. How about yours in the end?

physicsfeng 2023-03-27

There are requirements for both innovation and workload, with the former being more important.

bill90 2023-03-27

What happened in the end? I have also been working with the editor for over 10 days.

bill90 2023-03-27

It has been 10 days with my editor, shouldn't this journal be fast?

爱心觉罗岩 2023-03-26

It has been a month with editors. I reminded them once, but it doesn't seem to be effective.

jareau 2023-03-22

Make a note of it
2023.3.17 submit to journal
2023.3.22 with editor

秋叶雨生 2023-03-21

The journal impact factor is getting higher and higher, and I hope it will continue to improve! I hope the article I submitted can be accepted.

bill90 2023-03-21

May I ask if innovative requirements are high or workload requirements are high?

bill90 2023-03-21

In the previous two years, it was still in the second district. What does "old-fashioned first district" mean?

cxy1212 2023-03-20

March 20th, still with editor.

Kingyoung 2023-03-20

1.8 Submission
2.12 Repair suggestions
3.2 Revision
Received on March 19th

Kingyoung 2023-03-20

The speed is very fast. It took about 2 months from submission to revision to acceptance. The editor is very responsible. As expected, being a well-established institution in the first district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, its reputation is well-deserved. I hope it continues to improve!

bill90 2023-03-20

This is two possibilities. The first is that there are too many manuscripts to review, and the second is that the editor is constantly confirming whether your submission is really suitable for review.

日子没法过了 2023-03-18

3.14 sub - Submitted on March 14th
3.15 with editor - Under review by the editor on March 15th
3.17 decision in process - Decision being made on March 17th
Does this status indicate that it will be rejected?

Lianers 2023-03-17

It has been nearly ten days for me too. Why is it so slow?

cxy1212 2023-03-15

March 13th submitted to journal
March 14th with editor

lvjulvtou 2023-03-14

It has been 14 days with the editor, and this is too slow.

Lianers 2023-03-13

Record it down.
March 7th - submitted to journal.
March 9th - with editor.

噜噜噜1 2023-03-09

Record it:
03.08 Submitted to Journal

HAO 2023-03-08

Still waiting for the fourth reviewer, feeling nervous.

小郎君 2023-03-03

2022.10.12 Submission
2022.10.17 Under review
2022.12.6 One reviewer, major revision, editor reviewed it themselves, probably couldn't find another reviewer
2023.12.15 Revised
2023.12.26 Reviewer provided 4-5 comments, editor continued to request language revisions
2023.1.2 Ignored editor's language revision request, revised again
2023.1.15 Editor got angry and said they wouldn't make language revisions, rejected the submission
2023.1.24 Found language polishing, resubmitted
2023.2.1 Accepted directly
Will never provoke the editor again, too troublesome.

HAO 2023-03-02

Update, March 2, 2023, RRC update, currently three reviewers have responded with their comments on the review.