地摊文学家 2021-05-19

Need to make some serious changes. Negative opinions will affect the editor's acceptance of the manuscript, so it needs to be carefully revised. However, the status of "Revise and resubmit" itself does not affect the review process and does not determine the final acceptance of the manuscript. If we must say something, it can be considered as an opportunity given by the editor for you to make revisions. Just make the changes seriously.

预策 2021-05-18

This revise and resubmit has three review comments, one of which is more negative. The format has already been revised once.

预策 2021-05-18

This revise and resubmit has three review comments, one of which is more negative.

啃低保的研究生 2021-05-18

This doesn't mean anything, it's just that the format of the submission doesn't meet the requirements. It has no impact on whether the manuscript will be ultimately accepted. Just make the necessary modifications as per the editor's requirements. Good luck.

Gov 2021-05-16

Ah, submitting articles requires so much luck. There are too many submissions, it's too slow. The one submitted on February 1st is still under review... It's really frustrating.

画个圈圈喜欢你 2021-05-15

revise and resubmit means a major revision, carefully revising it has the opportunity!

预策 2021-05-10

I referenced the wrong citation format, the article title is too long, and the rest is quite casual.

antistick 2021-05-10

Can you share the submission template? Why did you ask for a format change? Thank you!

预策 2021-05-10

English translation: 5.09 revise and resubmit
May I ask if this is a worse outcome than a major revise?

冬季花园 2021-05-08

2021.5.08 reject

Pisc 2021-05-06

ur change represents the reviewer's refusal to review, not the return of reviewer's comments. This is how Elsevier works.

Pisc 2021-05-06

"ur变动代表审稿人拒绝审稿，Elsevier是这样" translates to "ur changes represent the reviewers' refusal to review, this is how Elsevier is."

搬砖人1012 2021-04-23

Translation: "2020-12-06 Post
Under review for over four months now, the status has changed a few times during this period, but still no feedback has been received."

Dr.假老练 2021-04-18

20210222投稿: Posted on February 22, 2021.
20210316ur: Your message on March 16, 2021.
20210401ur: Your message on April 1, 2021.

冬季花园 2021-04-14

2021.4.6 提交 (Submitted on April 6th, 2021)
2021.4.12 编辑 (With editor on April 12th, 2021)

预策 2021-04-12

4.12 under review

预策 2021-04-12

2.28 submit
3.02 with editor
3.14 return for formatting revisions
3.16 resubmit
3.21 with editor
4.09 with editor
4.10 under review
Good luck!

地摊文学家 2021-04-11

It means "The With Editor stage lasts for one month."

Gov 2021-04-09

What is a preliminary review at the beginning of the month?

Gov 2021-04-09

Wow, this has been a long time. My two months, my status has been updated a few times. I heard that the status only updates when the reviewers return their review comments. Based on the number of updates, if it's more than three reviewers, it means it's not going smoothly. I hope everything goes well.

Gov 2021-04-09

Knowledge update status, still under review. It should be that the reviewer has returned with review comments. I hope everything goes smoothly.

穿过时间看你 2021-04-06

The status was updated on March 29, 2021 and is still under review (not sure if it has been assigned to a new reviewing expert or for other reasons).

crr9 2021-04-01

A very good journal

AA华蓥山NU 2021-03-31

It has been half a year since I submitted it, and there is still no news.

早点接收啊啊啊 2021-03-31

The current status is in the second round of review.

穿过时间看你 2021-03-31

Under review as of February 21, 2021. Continued updates will be provided later for your reference.

干饭王 2021-03-24

2020.4.1 Submission
2020.5.12 Format issue for revision

科研少女冲冲冲 2021-03-24

Submitted on January 15th, 2021.
Received rejection notice on March 21st, 2021.
Three reviewers, the opinions of the first two reviewers were fair. The third reviewer doubted whether the review was conducted seriously, raised some mathematical formula definitions, and some superficial issues. It is possible that my own paper was not written well enough.

懒得起名药药 2021-03-04

2021.01.20, submission
2021.01.22, with editor
2021.02.11, still with editor for updates
2021.02.26, decision in process
It seems like the submission will be rejected... The efficiency is too low, it's already 3.4 and still no update. If it's going to be rejected, at least do it decisively.

地摊文学家 2021-03-03

The second ASOC received feedback from five reviewers. The initial review process took about a month, followed by another month for external reviews. It was quite fast. After three rounds of revisions, the paper was finally accepted. Many thanks to the editor and the reviewers.