悠米拉屎滂臭 2023-03-06

2022.12.09 submitted to journal
2023.02.04 major revision
2023.02.17 submitted to journal
2023.02.19 under review
2023.02.24 required reviews completed
2023.02.28 accept

Translated:

2022.12.09 submitted to journal
2023.02.04 major revision
2023.02.17 submitted to journal
2023.02.19 under review
2023.02.24 required reviews completed
2023.02.28 accept

00123333 2023-03-02

My today has already shown "Required Reviews Complete". There are 5 reviewers, 2 feedback responses, and the remaining 3 are still under review.

橙紫 2023-03-02

Thank you, I saw it. The second reviewer has not replied yet.

橙紫 2023-03-02

Hello, have you replied to your feedback? Is there only one reviewer's opinion? Or where can I see it? Thank you for your response.

sumwang 2023-03-02

12.25 submit.
12.29 under review.
1.26 major revision.
2.12 revision submitted to journal.
2.14 under review.
2.25 accept.
Overall speed is acceptable, but the review of modification suggestions is slightly slow, causing anxiety.

飞机不会飞 2023-02-28

I want to ask everyone, the manuscript was submitted on 2.18, and a reviewer's response was received on 2.22. Is it likely that the paper will be rejected?

叶小乐 2023-02-28

Email address of corresponding author

橙紫 2023-02-27

I also want to see the track link. 1.28 under review.

飞机不会飞 2023-02-27

I want to ask you experts, does this journal have a track link? If so, where can I find it?

飞机不会飞 2023-02-27

I would like to ask, how long does it usually take to receive a response for "under review"? In the field of catalysis.

橙紫 2023-02-23

I also want to know, 1.28 under review, still no news until now.

lab lab lab 2023-02-21

So fast! May I ask which editor it is?

lab lab lab 2023-02-21

May I ask which editor is so fast?

中中中~ 2023-02-20

May I ask how many reviewers you have?

橙紫 2023-02-19

1.23 Submission
1.26 Editing
1.28 Under review
Waiting for message

歪歪 2023-02-11

May I ask why the "under review" time keeps changing, but the status of "reviewer accepting the review" and "review completed" that I see in "track your submission" has not changed? What is the situation?

AMFfree 2023-02-10

2022.09.29 Submitted
2022.09.30 Under review
2023.01.04 Minor revision
2023.01.16 Resubmitted
2023.01.16 Accept
Only one of the two reviewers provided feedback, and the second reviewer took a long time, resulting in only one reviewer's comments. Fortunately, it worked out.

果子哥 2023-02-08

Avoid this editor Guangsheng Luo, he is a trash.

中中中~ 2023-02-02

A paper is currently under review. Good luck to the original poster.

中中中~ 2023-02-01

Currently, 2+ reviewers have been invited, but only 2 reviewers have accepted the review. One reviewer has completed the review on the 25th. Hoping for good news.

上交学者 2023-01-31

One major repair, one medium repair, finally received on New Year's Eve...
The process was quite bumpy. After each revision, the editor invited new experts to review it, with high requirements, greatly improving the paper.

中南Q 2023-01-30

Old brand journal, the impact factor of this journal is expected to exceed 10 this year, ranking in the top category. It may become increasingly difficult to submit articles to it in the future.

Q 2023-01-30

Old and authoritative journal in the field of chemical engineering, with high recognition. The editors are also quite strict.

2022.08.11 Submitted
2022.10.05 Feedback from four reviewers: three revisions and one rejection, editor requested resubmission after modifications
2022.11.25 Resubmitted after carefully addressing over thirty comments
2023.12.26 New feedback from four reviewers (presumably different from previous reviewers): four revisions, editor requested major revisions
2023.1.15 Submitted after diligently revising for 20 days in the office
2023.1.27 Lunar New Year's Day, received feedback, one revision and three accepted, editor requested minor revisions
2023.1.29 Modifications returned
2023.1.30 Accepted.

This journal has high recognition in this field, so I submitted this innovative and systematic work to this journal. It went through a convoluted process involving a total of eight reviewers, but the outcome was good.

橙紫 2023-01-30

Hello, do I need to upload the supplementary materials on e-component? I have already placed them directly after the manuscript, and it is currently under review as of 1.28. Will it be rejected, as you mentioned? Thank you for your reply.

橙紫 2023-01-30

Hello, may I ask if there are any results now? From 1.28 until now, do we have to wait for a long time during this period? Will there be any rejections? I can wait, I just hope it won't be rejected.

mango504 2023-01-29

12.2 submit
12.2 under review
12.19 major revision
1.7 revision submitted to journal
1.7 under review
1.15 accept

buff- 2023-01-25

1.20投 - Submitted on 1.20
1.22 under review
Will there be reviewers handling manuscripts during the Spring Festival? There is currently no update on the status, but I see that everyone's dates will be changed to 1.30.

无限进步 2023-01-16

Wishing everyone good health! Enjoy your studies!

无限进步 2023-01-16

Submitted on 10.19,
The status of the review changed three times in the middle, and I thought that new reviewers had been invited.
Feedback received on 12.27, two reviewers clearly requested minor revisions, and the result was a minor revision.
Revised on 1.3
Accepted on 1.13
Waited for so long, only to find out that there were only two reviewers who requested minor revisions. I suspect that after November, the reviewers were busy, which caused some delays.

叶小乐 2023-01-16

"1.14 Directly accepted, it seems there was no review process. The editor accepted it after reading it. Thank you Kuolun Tung for editing."