Verified Reviews - SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

duolaaa 2021-06-29

One week after submitting the revised manuscript, the reviewers received an email. However, it has been another 11 days and there is still no response from the reviewers. May I ask, how long is the typical review period after submitting revisions? The longer I wait, the more anxious I become.

老边 2021-06-28

There seems to be a difference of opinion between the two reviewers. The editor should find another reviewer or review it themselves. Good luck!

老边 2021-06-28

May I know which editor is handling it?

WJG, 2021-06-27

It has been over three months since I submitted it, but the editor hasn't even found a reviewer. I am really frustrated.

gh. 2021-06-17

3.23 Submission
4.8 Major revision
5.29 Re-submission
6.14 Acceptance
Thank you, Professor Chen Guohua and the two reviewers, for the swift and diligent review process. The reviewers were very patient and thorough.

发光的lulu 2021-06-11

Just the date has changed, it's now June 11th. But the review status "Required Reviews Completed" hasn't changed. What's going on?

发光的lulu 2021-06-11

Upstairs expert, I submitted my work on 5.12, it went under review on 5.14, and on 6.03 the status changed to "Required Reviews Completed". It has been a week already, what does this mean? How long does it generally take?

aaaa123 2021-06-07

Classmate, you didn't receive the proof for two months at that time. How did you handle it afterwards?

aaaa123 2021-06-04

Submitted on March 28, 2021, and accepted on May 19, 2021. The acceptance email stated that I would receive the proof within two weeks, but it has been two weeks already and I still haven't received the galley. Do I need to sign any agreement during this period, or can I write to the editor to inquire about the delay? Has anyone else experienced this situation before? Seeking guidance from experts, thank you very much!

chentu 2021-05-17

Can only say, the speed is really fast, of course, this depends on the editor, on the one hand, it depends on the quality of your article and the revised article, from submission to acceptance, it took a total of 2 months and 2 days.
3.15 submit
3.17 with editor
3.17 under review
4.17 major revision (Three reviewers, Reviewer 1 provided 5 comments without explicitly accepting or rejecting; Reviewer 2 provided 2 comments and suggested acceptance after minor revisions; Reviewer 3 provided 4 comments and requested acceptance after minor revisions; The editor's comments suggested major revisions)
5.14 revision back (I made serious revisions based on the comments, which took one month, including conducting additional experiments and reanalyzing data)
5.17 accept (The decision letter indicated that all three reviewers recommended direct acceptance)
This is my third SCI paper, although the score is not high, I am still very happy because I put in effort and received a reward. Scientific research is indeed challenging, but as long as you persevere and endure, you will definitely reap your own achievements. Keep it up, guys!

Dr.Pepper 2021-05-14

Several experts in the field are members of the editorial board of SPT, and it is not excessive to call this journal the top journal in this area.
12.14 submitted
12.21 under review
01.25 major revision, two reviewers, one with 4 minor revision questions, and the other with nearly 50 questions.
Editor Bandaru Ramarao requested a major revision, which took two months.
03.25 revised. Response letter of over 9000 words, carefully addressing each question.
03.31 under review
04.30 minor revision. One reviewer accepted it, and the other requested minor revisions to six small issues. Editor Kuo Lun Tung requested the minor revisions, which took two months.
05.14 revised
05.14 accept

科研鬼才001 2021-05-14

The direction is wrong, it should be electrochemical water treatment.

科研鬼才001 2021-05-14

I have to say that the speed of the journal is really fast! Thanks to Editor Chen Guohua and the reviewers!

.doc 2021-05-01

I was pretty quick this time, I gave feedback on the revisions in a month and a half.

晨曦阳冲冲冲 2021-04-30

How long did it take in total? Reviewing.

.doc 2021-04-29

Although two articles have been rejected, one has been accepted. However, the journal is good, the editor is very good, and the speed is relatively fast.

学海无边 2021-04-27

2021.2.28 Submitted
2021.3.03 Under review
2021.3.09 Under review, date changed once
2021.3.28 Reviewer's comments returned
2021.4.10 Revised
2021.4.25 Accepted
Thank you to the journal for the separation and purification. Thank you to the editor. Best wishes for the journal's continued success!

小跟班 2021-04-27

My editing has been in their hands for over ten days, and there hasn't been any change. I don't know what's going on.

小跟班 2021-04-27

Hello, I would like to ask, it has been ten days since my with editor, what's going on? How about yours?

咖啡豆0101 2021-04-16

Posted on December 1, 2020.
Rejected on December 17, 2020, with editorial suggestions for revision and resubmission.
Resubmitted on January 25, 2021, and sent for review on the 27th.
Received reviewer's comments on February 25, 2021.
Returned revised manuscript on March 27, 2021.
Accepted on April 16, 2021.
Finally accepted after nearly three months. Thank you, editor! Best wishes for continued success.

无牙 2021-03-26

Thank you to the editor and the reviewer. After a major revision and a minor revision, it has finally been accepted. It was submitted in early February and accepted today, March 26th.

MST-江户川 2021-03-25

3.21 accept (English)

georgeczy 2021-03-23

3.23 Hiring
Hired when I was about to enter the state of "require reviews completed"
Thanks to the editor and reviewers.

Zagire 2021-03-22

November 18, 2020 Submission
December 16, 2020 Rejection
January 11, 2021 Revised and resubmitted, under review on January 17, under review on January 27, under review on February 17
March 4, 2021 Minor revision
March 8, 2021 Submitted for review after revision
March 21, 2021 Accepted.
Thank you, editor! Best wishes for continued success!

TSIR 2021-03-22

Typographical error

TSIR 2021-03-22

Thank you, editor, for accepting my article.
Submitted on December 14, 2020.
Major revisions made on January 14, 2021.
Took two months to carefully respond to the reviewer's comments.
Resubmitted on March 13, 2021.
Accepted on March 19, 2020.
Excited to see that this journal has now been upgraded to Zone 1.

georgeczy 2021-03-20

The last day of the holiday is February 28th, and the manuscript will be returned.
On March 5th, the editor will start processing and submit the manuscript on the same day.
Hope to get the results early, graduation is approaching, and hope to get the results soon.

MST-江户川 2021-03-19

After returning the document on March 19, 2021, I will work with the editor again.

sx...... 2021-03-18

The first two issues of 2021 have not been retrieved, I don't know why.

chentu 2021-03-15

Classmate, how are you doing now? Did you receive it?

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now