Verified Reviews - SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

老科研人员 2022-03-19

May I ask at what time you choose the publishing method? Is it at the time of submission or after acceptance?

一只兔子 2022-03-18

The speed is quite fast, and the feedback was received three weeks after submission. There were four reviewers, with three suggesting revisions and one having a negative attitude. The editor requested major revisions.
The second review took one week, and three reviewers accepted the manuscript. The one with a negative attitude remained stubborn and wrote a bunch of disrespectful comments about the article without mentioning any specific issues. The editor requested major revisions again.
Fingers crossed.

云木 2022-03-15

The translation of the text into English is as follows:

Jan 24, 2022 submitted to journal
Feb 06, 2022 major review
Feb 26, 2022 revision submitted to journal
Mar 15, 2022 accept
The speed is very fast. Although it took about ten days to accept after making changes, the overall speed is quite impressive. Thanks to editor Deng.

小白大沟 2022-03-01

Jan 13, 2022 submitted to journal
Jan 25, 2022 required reviews completed
Feb 07, 2022 major review
Feb 27, 2022 revision submitted to journal
Feb 28, 2022 accept

It took a total of 46 days from submission to acceptance. The major revision was given 20 days, and the efficiency of the editor and reviewers was extremely high. Thank you very much to the editor and reviewers! Wishing the journal continued success!

faithlixin 2022-02-25

2022.01.20 submitted to journal
2022.01.20 with editor
2022.01.20 under review
2022.01.25 under review
2022.02.12 major revision
2022.02.18 revision submitted to journal
2022.02.18 with editor
2022.02.20 under review
2022.02.23 required reviews completed
2022.02.23 accept

Translated:

2022.01.20 submitted to journal
2022.01.20 with editor
2022.01.20 under review
2022.01.25 under review
2022.02.12 major revision
2022.02.18 revision submitted to journal
2022.02.18 with editor
2022.02.20 under review
2022.02.23 required reviews completed
2022.02.23 accept

晓之以理 2022-02-23

I submitted an article a few days ago, and it is currently under review. I hope to have the same luck as the author.

319 2022-02-23

2022.01.14 Submitted to Journal
2022.01.16 With editor
2022.01.16 Under review
2022.01.18 Under review
2022.01.29 Required Reviews Completed
2022.01.30 Major Revision
2022.02.18 Revision Submitted to Journal
2022.02.18 With editor
2022.02.19 Under review
2022.02.22 Required Reviews Completed
2022.02.22 Accept

Translated text:
2022.01.14 Submitted to Journal
2022.01.16 With editor
2022.01.16 Under review
2022.01.18 Under review
2022.01.29 Required Reviews Completed
2022.01.30 Major Revision
2022.02.18 Revision Submitted to Journal
2022.02.18 With editor
2022.02.19 Under review
2022.02.22 Required Reviews Completed
2022.02.22 Accept

是非得失 2022-02-09

2021.12.13 submitted
2022.1.11 major revise
2022.2.3 minor revise
2022.2.9 accept
The review process of SPT is supposed to be fast, but it took me a month to receive the revised manuscript. There were four reviewers, two major revisions, one minor revision, and one acceptance. The reviewers provided professional and helpful suggestions for improving the quality of the article, which I fully accepted. I would like to thank Jorge Bedia for editing and wish SPT continued success.

若愚 2022-02-08

Jan 10, 2022 - Submitted
Jan 13, 2022 - Under Review
Jan 24, 2022 - Required Reviews Completed
Jan 25, 2022 - Major Revision
Feb 04, 2022 - Revision Submitted to Journal
Feb 05, 2022 - Under Review
Feb 07, 2022 - Required Reviews Completed
Feb 08, 2022 - Completed - Accept
Less than a month from submission to acceptance, both the editor and reviewers were very efficient! Many thanks to Editor Guohua Chen and the reviewers for their time and effort! Best wishes for the continued success of the journal!

是非得失 2022-01-27

The original text is in Chinese and it translates to: "The original poster has done a pretty good job at work, I think they can publish an article with a higher level on IF."

kakaming 2022-01-23

2021.12.13 submitted to journal
2021.12.15 under review
2021.12.27 major revision
2022.01.13 revision submitted to journal
2022.01.15 under review
2022.01.17 required reviews completed
2022.01.17 accept

Translation:
2021.12.13 submitted to journal
2021.12.15 under review
2021.12.27 major revision
2022.01.13 revision submitted to journal
2022.01.15 under review
2022.01.17 required reviews completed
2022.01.17 accept

kakaming 2022-01-23

Submission Experience:
2021.12.13 submitted to journal
2021.12.15 under review
2021.12.27 major revision
2021.12.20 revision submitted to journal
2022.01.15 under review
2022.01.17 required reviews completed
2022.01.17 accept

小胖爱学习 2022-01-18

The journal review process is very fast, and the reviewers are very careful and responsible. It took one week to submit for review, and exactly one month to receive the initial review results. There were two reviewers, and their opinions were very professional. After making the revisions according to the reviewers' requirements, the paper was accepted. Thanks to Editor GuangSheng Luo and the reviewers. I hope the journal will continue to improve and reach a circulation of over 10 soon!

西风 2022-01-16

2021.11.28 submitted to journal
2021.11.30 under review
2021.12.17 moderate revision
2021.12.20 revision submitted to journal
2021.12.22 under review
2022.01.04 required reviews completed
2022.01.08 under review
2022.01.15 required reviews completed
2022.01.16 accept

Thank you, Editor Prof. Shuguang Deng, for your incredibly fast processing and very friendly attitude!

科学怪人乀群爷 2022-01-13

The work of the original poster, I specifically took a look at it and the workload is still quite heavy. It should be no problem to submit it to CEJ. Everyone has the same research direction, so we can communicate and learn from each other in the future.

科学怪人乀群爷 2022-01-13

I am also working in the field of advanced oxidation water treatment. The original poster can also consider submitting to ACB. I haven't submitted to SPT before, but after seeing your message, I also want to try this journal in future work. Hopefully, we can always maintain a first-tier ranking.

努力毕业的小黑 2022-01-12

The major revision submission has been with the editor for 7 days, when will it be finished?

polymerm 2022-01-06

Did they not review it again after the major renovation? Is there no "under review" status?

天问 2022-01-06

This submission was edited quickly and I am very satisfied. The material I worked on is photocatalytic material. I worked on it in December 2019 and didn't pay much attention to it after graduating in 2020. I started writing the article in 2021 and submitted it to ACB, CEJ, and JHM, but they all rejected it. CEJ sent it for review, but it went through a minor revision, a major revision, and ultimately a rejection.

Received at Editorial Office, 26 Nov 2021
Major revision, 14 Dec 2021. Four reviewers provided feedback, two major revisions and two minor revisions. I am grateful to the reviewers and the editor for giving me the opportunity to re-evaluate my article.

Article revised, 28 Dec 2021
Article accepted for publication, 6 Jan 2022.

小池池 2022-01-05

Additional information: On January 2, 2021, the second round of review comments were received, with only the fourth reviewer suggesting that some questions be addressed and supplemented in the original text. On January 4, 2021, the revised manuscript was returned. On January 5, 2021, the manuscript was accepted.

小池池 2021-12-31

Okay, my schedule hasn't changed at all. I'm still stuck on the 20th.

Tyrkeller 2021-12-31

The time period for completion of the required reviews has changed because more reviewers were assigned for the second review.

小池池 2021-12-31

So during the required review period, has the time status changed? Or has it become under review?

Tyrkeller 2021-12-31

Shuguang Deng

小池池 2021-12-30

Just want to ask, which editor is it?

柚子霉霉 2021-12-30

The text translates to:

The focus is on the application of advanced oxidation technology in complex water bodies. After considering WR/CEJ/JHM rejections, SPT was also not very confident in my heart.
Regarding the speed, first of all, I commend the speed of the review process, with results in just over a month. The reviewers' comments were very professional, raising relevant questions within the field, and after spending seven to eight days making revisions and responding, the proof format was then accepted and published.
Regarding the journal's ranking, during the trial period of the upgraded version by the Chinese Academy of Sciences from 2019 to 2022, it has consistently been classified as a first-tier journal. This confirms the quality of this well-established journal with an annual publication volume of over 1400 articles. After all, from 2022 onwards, only the upgraded version will be considered for journal rankings, and the basic version will no longer exist.
Regarding the quality, in the field of Engineering Technology, particularly in the area of wastewater treatment, this journal is of high quality, second only to WR/CEJ/JHM. I hope to receive more excellent papers in the future to gradually increase the influence of the journal!

Tyrkeller 2021-12-30

I submitted on 11/23 and received the first round of comments on 12/01. There were two reviewers, and it required major revisions. It took about a week to send it back. The required reviews were completed by the 20th. I only received the second round of comments this afternoon, and I also added three additional reviewers for minor revisions. Let's wait and see. It should be faster now. Good luck!

小池池 2021-12-28

The first review comments were received after about 20 days. There were four reviewers: the first three had two questions each, while the fourth had over twenty questions. However, all of them suggested that the paper is suitable for publication in this journal. The editor gave a "Moderate revise" decision.

On December 15, 2021, the revised version was submitted.
On December 18, 2021, the paper went under review.
On December 20, 2021, the required review was completed.

It has been 8 days since then, and there hasn't been any change. Could it be because of Christmas? Feeling a bit anxious.

The editor's name is Kuo-Lun (Allan) Tung.

阿赖耶识 2021-12-22

What is the latest IF price? I heard it dropped by 6.

元气森林 2021-12-17

The original text is already in Chinese. Here is the English translation:

"The OP's work is very meticulous, with the same direction as the OP. I have submitted to IECR, already cited the OP's article, and recommended the OP's supervisor as a reviewer."

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now