小爪诗 2022-09-07

My current manuscript is still under review. To check the progress, authors can track their submission by receiving emails from the journal's reviewers.

阿宝vs汤大基 2022-08-29

Share some submission experience
4.12 Submission
4.14 Automatically rejected by the system, reason: word count exceeded 5000 (including references, the total word count of the document should be below 5000)
4.15 Resubmission
5.13 Received feedback, two reviewers, not many issues, positive feedback, major revisions, given one month.
6.12 Revised and resubmitted (word count exceeded 5000, there was no other way, had to add a lot of content, luckily the system did not reject it)
7.02 Required review completed
7.03-7.10 Waiting anxiously (this period was agonizing)
7.11 Minor revision, minor issues
7.13 Revised
7.17 Accepted

Wishing everyone a smooth submission process and wishing SNB continued success.

风林 2022-08-25

The paper "Sensors and Actuators B Chemical" was submitted on June 9th. It was sent back for reformatting issues and resubmitted a week later. The review process took place in mid-July, and the feedback from the two reviewers was relatively simple, with positive evaluations. Due to personal reasons, there was a delay of one week in making the revisions. The revised manuscript was sent back by the end of July. The paper was accepted in mid-August. Overall, the review process of Sensors and Actuators B Chemical was fast, and the editor was nice. I hope Sensors and Actuators B Chemical continues to improve, achieving an Impact Factor of over 10 and maintaining its position in the top tier.

byakuya 2022-08-23

My situation is also similar. It took me a month to find two reviewers who agreed to review, and then it took almost another month for only one review comment to come back.

forsensor 2022-08-20

May I ask where did you see that the invited reviewer did not agree to review? I only saw that the "under review" status changed twice.

俐俐要加油呀 2022-08-18

SNB is really my favorite journal! This is my second article, and I want to express special thanks to Professor Ralf Moos, who edited both of them! I am very grateful for his help! I also want to thank my teachers for their understanding and support!

Now let's talk about the review process, which may be helpful for my friends:
- Submitted on April 29, 2022.
- It was reviewed in about 3 to 4 days, very fast.
- Major revisions were requested on June 10, 2022.
- Revised manuscript was submitted on July 10, 2022.
- Accepted on August 18, 2022!
Hahaha, "Accept" is truly the most beautiful word I have ever seen!

Let me explain the complicated process a bit. There were three reviewers, and I went through a major revision, a minor revision, and finally a rejection. I was worried for a long time, afraid that the rejecting reviewer would not agree to accept it. But after 38 days since the submission of the major revision, today, it was finally accepted directly! Once again, I want to thank the editor and the three reviewers! Thank you!

zifengtaxue 2022-08-14

Did you resubmit without reviewing it and then reject it? Why didn't you just reject it directly? It's a waste of time.

zifengtaxue 2022-08-13

I received an email requesting to reduce the word count to within 5000 words and resubmit with double spacing. I have made the necessary revisions and will resubmit it.

Lewis W 2022-08-12

August 1st under review

初见你1994 2022-08-11

I don't know why it's so slow. Is it because they have a holiday recently?

奋斗者666 2022-08-11

Mine too, 8.4 submitted to journal
8.5 editor invited
Afterward, it became submitted to journal again
The status hasn't changed until now, what's going on?

zifengtaxue 2022-08-10

I submitted my entry two days later than you, and we are both in the same situation, progressing quite slowly.

初见你1994 2022-08-10

7.31 submitted to journal
8.1 editor invited
8.2 submitted to journal
8.12 returned for resubmission
8.13 with editor
8.13 rejected

zifengtaxue 2022-08-05

Has the manuscript been reviewed now?

Lewis W 2022-08-05

25 is a re-submission.

小爪诗 2022-08-04

That's such a coincidence. There isn't any yet, later on, I found three more reviewers one after another, but none of them agreed. Then on the 2nd, I found another one, and the date changed.

zifengtaxue 2022-08-04

Is the 25th revised based on the review comments? So fast.

Alpenglow 2022-08-01

My entire submission process is the same as yours, with a review sent 2+. However, there is only one reviewer conducting the review. Have you received any news now?

小爪诗 2022-07-30

After being rejected, the recommendation was made to change the submission. I changed my submission to "Sensors and Actuators B: Chemistry".

2022.07.04 - Submitted to the journal.
2022.07.06 - Under review by the editor.
2022.07.08 - Rejected due to exceeding the word limit in the main text and incorrect placement of keywords.
2022.07.11 - Second submission.
2022.07.16 - Under review by the editor.
2022.07.21 - Currently under review.
2022.07.30 - Two review invitations sent; one review invitation accepted; one review completed.

Lewis W 2022-07-28

Return on July 25th, modify and upload on July 26th, with editor on July 27th. Good luck! ╮(╯﹏╰）╭

XiaoHu777 2022-07-27

Has there been any change now?

Lewis W 2022-07-25

Submitted to Journal on July 16th, Invited editor on the 17th, Submitted to Journal again on the 18th, and the status has not changed since then.

XiaoHu777 2022-07-21

Excuse me, does this journal's requirement of 5000 characters include the title to the conclusion, excluding the references?

wang 2022-07-18

Ask you guys for advice. It's my first time submitting to this journal. I don't understand it well. I want to ask if there are any requirements for the font and line spacing of the manuscript that are not mentioned in the guide for authors. Are there any other requirements for Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical besides the word count?

11nvli 2022-07-11

May I ask, under the situation of "under review," does the status change once after receiving a review comment?

过半 2022-07-08

Overall, it was very fast. Special thanks to editor Jong-Heun Lee for being highly efficient. The article was in their hands for no more than 3 days. I hope SNB continues to improve.

hzdpx 2022-07-05

The editing process and the speed of the reviewers are both very fast.
Submitted on 9th May 2022, a few days later asked to modify the format.
Returned on 17th May 2022, and then sent for review shortly after.
Received feedback on 13th June 2022, four reviewers, all recommended minor revisions for publication, the editor finally recommended major revisions.
Revised on 21st June 2022, and then sent for review to the original reviewers.
Returned on 2nd July 2022, minor revisions, revised on the same day.
Accepted on 5th July 2022.

阿宝vs汤大基 2022-06-29

IF it rises to 9.221, keep it up!

俐俐要加油呀 2022-06-28

Very nice! Thank you for your answer, I hope I can also be as successful as you! Thank you.

zms821 2022-06-28

This is unclear. In the end, during the final minor revision, two reviewers' opinions were given, one accepted and one minor revision. It seems that there was no opinion of rejection.