kubi材料狗 2023-04-14

It has been 20 days with the editor, and nothing has changed...

byakuya 2023-04-13

I am also like this. After the first submission, I was asked to revise the format three days later. Even after re-submitting, it has been almost a week and it is still submitted.
Last month, a similar article was not this slow. (Last month, after the format was revised, it was with the editor the next day.)

By666 2023-04-04

What is the status now?

By666 2023-04-04

Has the review been done now? My submission with the editor started on 3.23, it has been 12 days and it hasn't been reviewed yet.

是豆豆啊 2023-03-29

3-27 required reviewers completed
3-29 accepted
The second review was very efficient.
Thanks to the Chief Editor and Associate Editor Anita Lloyd Spetz, we submitted our manuscript to ACS Sensor and encountered a malicious rejection from one of the reviewers. As a result, we came to sensorb. Wishing the journal continued success.

是豆豆啊 2023-03-27

3-5 major revision - One minor and one major revision, the editor made significant changes, and the editor also acted as a reviewer, raising several questions.
3-25 submitted with editor
3-26 under review
The status can be checked in the corresponding author's email, there is an email.

jiaoutiancheng 2023-03-21

The time has changed for "under review". Where can I see the returned review comments?

tangxin 2023-03-16

I am too, I have been submitting to the journal every week, then waiting with the editor for three days, without any changes. It really wastes time...

Leon_1995 2023-03-10

May I ask what is the current situation? It has been a week since I submitted to the journal, but the status hasn't changed. Is this normal?

Leon_1995 2023-03-10

2023.3.1 Submitted to Journal
2023.3.2 Editor invited
2023.3.3 Returned for modification of highlighted words, then resubmitted to Journal
2023.3.10 Submitted to Journal
It's been a week and it's still "Submitted to Journal." Just wanted to ask if this is normal for those who have experienced it before? In the field of optical sensors.

是豆豆啊 2023-03-02

202300228 under review - The date has changed, and upon checking, it indicates that a review comment has been returned.
20230203 Required Reviews Completed.

勇敢牛牛 2023-03-01

One positive and one negative. The editor rejected it, but there may be a chance in the future. Don't believe that you can't achieve anything.

kubi材料狗 2023-02-27

2.25 submitted to journal
The manuscript was resubmitted to the journal again after being rejected. This is a common occurrence for this journal, so there is no need to worry.

3.21 submitted to journal
The manuscript was submitted to the journal on March 21st.

3.21 with editor
The manuscript has been with the editor for seven days now. Hopefully, it will be sent for review soon.

kubi材料狗 2023-02-27

2.24 Send it back for modification and resubmission, mainly to revise the labeling of the vertical axis.

kubi材料狗 2023-02-24

2.15 submitted to journal
2.22 send back to author for formatting revisions, which should be a necessary process
2.23 submitted to journal

是豆豆啊 2023-02-23

As of 2/23, it is still under review, and it is indeed very slow.
The deadline given to reviewers by this journal is 21 days, so why is it taking so long?

是豆豆啊 2023-02-13

That one can be ignored. It is likely that the reviewers did not look carefully. Just explain it in the cover letter and it will be fine. I have already included nearly 7000 references.

000000011111 2023-02-13

I'm really frustrated. I added more than 5000 references, but without adding them, there are only over 3000. They even asked me to reduce it to below 5000.

是豆豆啊 2023-02-10

The text consists of 5000 characters, including the title and conclusion, but does not include references. I did not write down the phone and fax numbers.

000000011111 2023-02-10

Can you please explain what "technical review" means? Does "5000 below" refer to the content of the main text being below 5000 words? Also, where can I find the phone and fax number of the corresponding author (including area and country codes)?

L337 2023-02-09

Submitted in May of the 22nd year, the associate editor suggested revisions and resubmission. This process repeated three times until the end of July when it was under review. In August, there was a major revision, followed by another major revision in October. Finally, in December, it became a minor revision. It was accepted on the first day of the 23rd year, right before it ended. It can be considered a good start for this year. It was indeed a long and arduous process. It was evident that the reviewers and the editor had high expectations for the content and quality of the article. It required the work to be done meticulously and every detail to be clearly explained. However, this resulted in a lengthy article. Initially, when I submitted it, an editor replied stating that the length should be kept below 5000 words. But after multiple revisions and additions, the actual length of the accepted version significantly exceeded this requirement. This was the most confusing aspect of my submission. Overall, it is a good journal, and the reviewers' comments are worth learning from. However, if you are eager to graduate, I suggest considering faster publication venues for your articles.

悠哉大王 2023-02-07

2022/8-14 submitted for the first time from Biosensors and Bioelectronics
8-19 First technical advice modification
8-25 Rejected, editor provided feedback for resubmission
8-29 Resubmitted
9-21 Third submission with two modifications of technical advice
10-26 Required reviews completed
10-31 Reviewer feedback received, one negative opinion and one minor revision. Editor rejected the submission and appealed for resubmission.
11-21 Completed experiments and responded to reviewer's comments. Fourth submission.
11-23 Modified technical advice
11-25 Rejected
Submission experience: Clearly a terrible experience. The technical advice was modified five or six times, mainly to reduce the main text to below 5000 words. Even a single extra word was not allowed. Multiple requests for resubmission were made, but in the end, it was heartlessly rejected, wasting the author's best opportunity to submit.

是豆豆啊 2023-02-05

1.26 under review - This means that something is currently being examined or evaluated.
2.1 under review - This also means that something is currently being examined or evaluated.

我是颜值君 2023-02-02

2023.1.25 Submitted

2023.1.28 Returned for format modifications

2023.1.31 Resubmitted

2022.2.1 Submitted to journal

是豆豆啊 2023-01-24

1-18 invited editor: On January 18th, an editor was invited to participate.
1-20 submitted to journal: On January 20th, the manuscript was submitted to the journal.
1-24 with editor: On January 24th, the manuscript is currently being reviewed by the editor.

是豆豆啊 2023-01-15

1/15 resubmitted translates to "one out of fifteen resubmitted" in English.

是豆豆啊 2023-01-14

Sure enough, on 1/13 it was submitted to the journal, on 1/14 it went to the editor, and on 1/14 the editor raised several new questions... and asked for resubmission.
Dear editor, can you please raise all your questions at once...

是豆豆啊 2023-01-12

1/12 editor invited - "No way, the process has to be repeated again... I'm dizzy."

是豆豆啊 2023-01-11

2022/12-31 submitted - Submitted on December 31, 2022.
2023/1-3 invited editor - Invited editor on January 3, 2023.
1-5 submitted - Submitted on January 5.
1-7 退回让修改格式 - Returned for format modification on January 7.
1-7 resubmitted - Resubmitted on January 7.
1-9 with editor - With editor on January 9.
1-10 Yasuhiro Shimizu 编辑退回，让添加测试温度和电阻 - Editor Yasuhiro Shimizu returned it for adding test temperature and resistance on January 10.
1-11 重新投稿 - Resubmitted on January 11.

forsensor 2023-01-04

Translation:

Jun 09, 2022 Submission
September 25, 2022 First review with two reviewers, many comments, major revisions
November 25, 2022 Revised manuscript returned
Jan 01, 2023 Accept

The first review took a long time, it was difficult to find reviewers. Overall, the process was quite fast, but I delayed the revised manuscript for two months in the middle.