v雪狐 2022-07-21

It has been 35 days since submission, but there has been no response. Why is it so slow?

求accept 2022-07-18

After reapplying, a major revision was made and the revised manuscript was accepted.

求accept 2022-07-18

What is the discount for college and university students?

LIUmeichen 2022-07-18

Do you want to ask if the initial manuscript requirements for this journal have been determined?

后撤不走步 2022-07-17

Okay, thank you, big brother.

好好学习吧孩子 2022-07-17

Of course, you can modify it yourself, provided that you have a good foundation in English. Additionally, you can also ask the teacher for help to take a look, and if that doesn't work, you can refer to some translation software. Personally, if you have the ability, it is better not to spend extra money. As for paper proofreading, reputable journals focus more on the content of the article, so it is generally unnecessary for regular journals.

yangjiajun 2022-07-17

Do I need to upload the source code and data when submitting to this journal?

后撤不走步 2022-07-17

The reviewer said that there are quite a few grammar errors in the text. Is it necessary to revise it? Is it okay to check and make changes by myself?

后撤不走步 2022-07-17

The reviewer said that there are quite a few grammar errors in the text, so is it necessary to polish it? Can I check and revise it myself?

好好学习吧孩子 2022-07-16

No need for proofreading, the reviewers did not mention any language issues, so there is no need for proofreading.

后撤不走步 2022-07-16

Excuse me, everyone. The reviewers mentioned that there are grammar errors in the article. Is it necessary to use the MDPI English editing service recommended on their official website? If not, will it lower the acceptance rate?

yangjiajun 2022-07-15

Hello, does this journal require the submission of source code and data?

QQstone 2022-07-14

Is it really that exaggerated? This journal isn't the kind that you can get accepted with just one submission.

QQstone 2022-07-14

Hired. This journal is completely open source, there is no talk of choice.

hui_ 2022-07-14

Has been cared for by the Chinese Academy of Sciences once, and feels that there is a possibility that it may have a slightly better reputation than IEEE Access.

hui_ 2022-07-14

Yeah, the Impact Factor is almost 4.0, but it dropped out of the Q1 zone. For newly graduated students who are applying, remember to prepare well. If you are already employed and have KPI assessments, it's not a problem.

hui_ 2022-07-14

Strangely, although the impact factor of IF has increased, Q1 has dropped to Q2. It is estimated that this is due to being listed on the "Chinese Academy of Sciences ranking." Unless it is necessary and urgent, it is still advisable to be cautious when submitting to this journal. If it is indeed submitted, remember to follow up with high-quality achievements to improve the reputation.

junjun 2022-07-14

Excuse me, buddy upstairs, I couldn't find the option to choose open access when submitting to this journal. Is it non-open access by default?

v雪狐 2022-07-14

It has been 28 days so far, and there is still no result. May I ask if our esteemed fellow has any result?

学术小辣鸡 2022-07-11

Flight trajectory planning direction
6.1 Author's statement submitted, accepted
6.21 Major revisions. Initially, only two reviewers provided feedback, and the editor said there might be a third one. However, after waiting for two days, two more reviewers appeared. In total, there were four reviewers, which constituted a major revision.
6.30 Revised.
7.5 Two reviewers provided minor revisions. Three days were given for the revisions.
7.7 Revised.
7.8 Waiting for the editor's decision.
7.11 Accepted.

淙淙柔水 2022-07-07

@Special
Yes, you can.

Breezeman 2022-07-07

Translate the following text into English: 2022/7/6 SCI retrieval
Furthermore, although the impact has increased, Q1 has dropped to Q2...

v雪狐 2022-07-05

Right, I have been waiting for 20 days now and still haven't received any news. I am planning to wait a few more days.

dl130624 2022-07-04

The translated text is: "The submission was rejected, and the feedback given was 'Considering the contents of the manuscript with lack of evidence of the original aspects and regarding the journal requirements'. What does 'lack of evidence of the original aspects' mean? Can someone knowledgeable answer this?"

特别 2022-07-01

Hello, may I ask how many pages your article is? Can I submit an article if it is less than 16 pages?

v雪狐 2022-06-30

Yes, I have submitted articles for all 9 pages.

特别 2022-06-29

Hello, I would like to ask if an article that is less than 16 pages in length can be submitted.

淙淙柔水 2022-06-25

2022.6.17 09:00 Revised Version Received
2022.6.17 09:34 Confirm the Manuscript
2022.6.20 20.00 Pending editor decision
2022.6.22 09.45 Accepted for Publication
2022.6.22 12.00 Pending english
2022.6.23 10.00 English correction done
2022.6.23 10.25 Author proofreading
2022.6.23 21.06 Author proofreading - resubmitted
2022.6.24 11.00 Pending conversion
2022.6.24 16.32 xml2pdf done
2022.6.24 17.17 Online

淙淙柔水 2022-06-25

2022.5.29 01:15 Submission Received
2022.5.30 11:05 Please Confirm the Issues
2022.5.31 12:04 Manuscript Resubmitted
2022.5.31 12:07 Article Processing Charge Confirmation
2022.5.31 12:07 Assistant Editor Assigned
2022.5.31 15:00 Article Processing Charge Confirmation Received
2022.6.12 15:57 Major Revisions
2022.6.13 14:46 English pre-editing
2022.6.16 18:40 Editing completed
2022.6.16 20:59 Manuscript Resubmitted

Translation:
2022.5.29 01:15 Submission Received
2022.5.30 11:05 Please Confirm the Issues
2022.5.31 12:04 Manuscript Resubmitted
2022.5.31 12:07 Article Processing Charge Confirmation
2022.5.31 12:07 Assistant Editor Assigned
2022.5.31 15:00 Article Processing Charge Confirmation Received
2022.6.12 15:57 Major Revisions
2022.6.13 14:46 English pre-editing
2022.6.16 18:40 Editing completed
2022.6.16 20:59 Manuscript Resubmitted

pluto0216 2022-06-25

Submission date: 2022.5.17
First revision: 2022.5.31 Given 10 days, there were a total of 3 reviewers. The editor initially mentioned that there was a fourth reviewer's opinion pending, but later informed that there was no fourth reviewer. The first reviewer gave a very positive evaluation without raising any issues. The second reviewer raised a total of 20 points, big and small. The third reviewer raised 8 questions, including some challenging ones (such as adding control experiments and using older references). The revised version was returned 10 days later (2022.6.10).

Second revision: 2022.6.10 The revised version was returned at 3 am, and on the same day at 4 pm, the comments for the second round of revisions were received, only from the third reviewer, addressing the issues that were not resolved in the first round and providing additional comments. The second round was given 5 days. Returned on 2022.6.14.

Pending editor decision: 2022.6.14
Acceptance: 2022.6.20
Proofreading: 2022.6.21 Requested to be returned within 1 day.
Website online: 2022.6.22