paper_怪 2021-06-04

After the major revisions, was it not sent for external review? Did the editor directly give minor revisions and then accept them?

paper_怪 2021-06-04

After the major revision, was it not sent for external review? Did the editor directly give a minor revision?

Lling铛 2021-06-02

May I ask which editor you have chosen?

Tianxin 2021-06-01

Submit: 2021.4.28
Under review: 2021.4.28
Under review: 2021.5.10 (date changed once)
Required reviews completed: 2021.5.17
Minor revision: 2021.5.20
Revision submitted: 2021.5.31
Accept: 2021.5.31

XC1119796177 2021-05-31

Joking. STOTEN is not an open-access journal that pays money. Did you only see the number of articles published and the number of submissions? The acceptance rate is only a quarter. If the overall situation collapses, JCLP and BT will also collapse together.

Suiqq 2021-05-30

Typed the wrong character, recommend one corresponding author instead of marking two corresponding authors.

Suiqq 2021-05-30

2021-04-12 Submitted
2021-04-17 Under Review
2021-05-23 Required Reviews Completed
2021-05-24 Major Revisions
2021-05-26 Revisions Submitted (R1)
2021-05-26 With Editor
2021-05-28 Minor Revisions
2021-05-28 Revisions Submitted (R2)
2021-05-28 With Editor
2021-05-28 Accepted

Translation:
2021-04-12 Submitted
2021-04-17 Under Review
2021-05-23 Required Reviews Completed
2021-05-24 Major Revisions
2021-05-26 Revisions Submitted (R1)
2021-05-26 With Editor
2021-05-28 Minor Revisions
2021-05-28 Revisions Submitted (R2)
2021-05-28 With Editor
2021-05-28 Accepted

Suiqq 2021-05-30

The first submission to the journal took about 40 days to receive feedback from three reviewers, namely reviewers 1, 2, and 4. Reviewers 1 and 2 gave positive evaluations, with reviewer 2 directly recommending minor revisions for acceptance and publication. The third reviewer, who was not specialized in microbiology, asked many basic microbiology-related questions. Although there were several errors in these questions, I answered them all seriously. Despite the editor's suggestion for major revisions, it actually seemed like minor revisions. I spent about a day making the revisions and quickly received the editor's feedback a few days later, suggesting to use only one reviewer instead of two. After making the necessary modifications, I resubmitted the article and within approximately 5 hours, I received an email notifying me that the article had been accepted for publication. In summary, the article required a large amount of data, and it was important to write the abstract, introduction, and methods carefully. It was also crucial to respond seriously to the feedback provided during the revision process. Other than that, there was nothing else noteworthy.

遥感人 2021-05-28

I am struggling whether to vote or not, really struggling, and I hope everyone can give some advice. The overall situation is good, it is the top journal in the first district, and the impact factor is also high. However, there are too many articles published, and there are too many people around me who have published in this journal. Will it become saturated?

XC1119796177 2021-05-25

There is no need to brush many times a day, once a day is enough, and you will receive an email notification when there are results. Just do what you need to do, don't be too anxious.

futianbo 2021-05-24

Uncomfortable. I refresh web pages eight hundred times a day.

rain00000 2021-05-24

The journal's official website states the average first decision: 2.3 weeks.

futianbo 2021-05-24

After the change of the audit date on May 3rd, there has been no further activity.

rain00000 2021-05-23

How is your article now?

paper_怪 2021-05-21

How is your article now?

科研民工小明 2021-05-20

Font size: Times New Roman
Body font size: 12pt
Double spacing
Continuous line numbering
Page numbering

wmpaper 2021-05-20

May I ask if there are any document format requirements for the STE proposal? I have seen requirements for charts and such on the official website, but I couldn't find any information regarding font size and line spacing. I would appreciate your guidance. Thank you!

paper_怪 2021-05-19

It has been over a month, and still no news.

futianbo 2021-05-18

Did you come back from the external audit in just 10 days? That's too enviable... I've been away for over a month.

科研民工小明 2021-05-13

3.12 submit to journal
3.13 with editor
3.19 under review
3.29 required reviews completed
4.2 required reviews completed
4.12 major revision
5.9 with editor
5.10 under review
5.12 required reviews completed
5.12 accept

nmg 2021-05-12

There should be feedback from reviewers, and there are still comments from other reviewers that haven't been received yet.

FSKLAJGKA 2021-05-10

May I ask if the overall speed of manuscript review has slowed down? According to some previous information on the review cycle of articles, the current review process is very slow!

tangpeng-scu 2021-05-10

Hello, I want to ask how long your article usually stays with the editor before receiving news of approval or rejection. It has been almost a week since I submitted mine.

futianbo 2021-05-10

4.4 Under Review - This means that something is currently being reviewed or evaluated.
5.3 Under Review - This also means that something is currently being reviewed or evaluated.
What does "外审变日期是怎么回事呀？求问" mean?

布达拉宫小天使 2021-05-09

Hello, have you finished proofreading?

Kristar 2021-05-08

21.04.26 submission
21.04.28 under review
It has been under review until now.
Hope to have results soon. ??????????????????????

joeylllll 2021-05-07

2020.7.15 Post
2020.9. Major revision
2020.10.13 Acceptance
My first SCI publication, grateful for the overall speed.

木脑文 2021-05-06

2021.04.21 submission
2021.05.06 with editor

Translation:
2021.04.21 submission
2021.05.06 with editor

揍他个小舅子 2021-05-05

You reviewed it too quickly.

菲菲2 2021-05-01

11.3 submission
11.5 with editor
11.6 under review
1.11 required reviews completed
1.11 under editor evaluation
1.16 under review

Translation:
11.3 - Submitted
11.5 - Being reviewed by the editor
11.6 - Under review
1.11 - Completed required reviews
1.11 - Under evaluation by the editor
1.16 - Under review