silkyrose 2021-07-08

Has your present yielded any results?

求各位录用我 2021-07-07

Hello, I have also encountered this situation. Have you solved it now? I don't know how to submit the source files, and I don't have an email either.

求各位录用我 2021-07-07

Hello, after my article is accepted, I need to submit the source file. I don't know how to submit it. Could you please teach me? There is no website mentioned in the email. Thank you.

牵牛心语 2021-07-04

OP, mine is also a similar editorial review comment. It compares the major revisions with other papers. I also have comparative experiments in my paper, but I'm not sure if it's because the journals that published those papers are open access. I don't know how to respond or add experiments now. Do I need to include new comparative experiments? Can anyone who has had a similar experience please advise on how to handle this? Thank you!

JCR 2021-07-02

Our dates are about the same, both under review on June 1st.

JCR 2021-07-02

Our dates are about the same, also under review on June 1st.

silkyrose 2021-07-01

I thought it would be faster, but I can only continue to wait and dare not rush the manuscript.

AXXZ 2021-06-30

Three months have passed without any news after the review, and I dare not push for the draft. The reason should be that the application field is too niche.

lotianveo 2021-06-28

Excuse me, is it theoretically easy to be published in this journal?

南梦 2021-06-27

The paper has been accepted and I will answer the questions from the contributors within the next 6 months.
Q: Season three, season zero, umbrella nine, ba jiu temple. The group owner will answer here (without any charge).
I submitted the paper on December 7th, 2020, and around December 10th, I edited and reviewed the paper.
After half a month of editing and reviewing, the lengthy first external review began.
The result of the first external review required major revisions, and it was returned around early February.
The result of the second external review required major revisions, and it was returned around late April.
The result of the third external review required major revisions, and it was returned around mid-June.
There were no minor revisions, it was directly accepted. I was notified on June 24th, 2021.
The second reviewer rejected the manuscript, but the editor gave another chance.
Afterwards, the editor found two more reviewers, so it took quite a long time during this period.
I am happy that it was accepted, with a total duration of 7 months. The reviewer has a positive view of my paper.
In theory, it can be submitted to top conferences and second-tier journals, but I didn't submit it to Image Net due to the issue of computer performance.
The reviewers were quite serious, and the first reviewer directly pointed out the issue with the dataset, so I had to run it (without changing the journal).
That's all for now.

13258 2021-06-26

Excuse me, everyone. On May 23rd, I received the major revision, and I submitted the revised draft on June 25th. When I submitted it, I noticed that there was a deadline on the system for June 21st. I was five days late. Does it have any impact? Although my submission was successful, I am a bit worried. Should I write an apology letter to the editor and explain the situation? At that time, there was no mention of a deadline in the email when I received the major revision. I only saw it when I submitted it. I feel uneasy. I request the advice of all the experts.

lxiy 2021-06-24

The Under Review date for my inquiry has also changed.

lxiy 2021-06-24

I submitted on May 31st and it is under review as of June 7th.

小龙小龙 2021-06-22

2021 05 26 submitted
2021 06 06 with the editor
2021 06 21 revised submitted
2021 06 22 under review
Is "under review" referring to the editor or to finding reviewers for review?

ICRC-WSC 2021-06-15

2021-02-06 Submission
2021-03-12 Major revision
Three reviewers, the first and third reviewers both provided nearly 20 comments, but it can be seen that they are still very responsible. The first reviewer even taught how to add comparative experiments, the significance of the experiments, and the theoretical basis in the review comments... The second reviewer was very harmonious and stated that adding some experiments would make it a good article.
2021-04-30 Major revision completed and submitted to the system
2021-05-30 Minor revision
The first and third reviewers directly stated that all the modifications meet the expected recommendation for acceptance, but the second reviewer started to cause trouble, actually saying in the comments, "I think there was a mistake during the first review, being too kind to your work that I did not provide necessary comments. In fact, I do not understand or agree with your work, blah blah..."
2021-06-13 Minor revision completed and submitted to the system
One day later
2021-06-14 Acceptance confirmed
Currently waiting for them to finish revising the format for final confirmation...
In my submission process, each review took about a month to a month and a half, which is still good.
However, APIN, this journal, is only in the third tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Although the editors are responsible, the process is still quite troublesome, and the cost-effectiveness is not particularly high. With this amount of time, it may be enough to publish one or two articles in Entropy.

初心丶 2021-06-15

June 3rd with editor
June 14th under review

LUOBOSI 2021-06-11

May I ask what does "under review日期改变是啥情况啊?" mean in English?

lizehui 2021-06-10

May I ask when you submitted the manuscript to the school?

vivi_and_qiao 2021-06-09

Correction: Accept on May 19, 2021.

vivi_and_qiao 2021-06-09

2020 12-15: Submit.
2021 1-6: Major revisions.
2021 1-30: Revisions submitted.
2021 3-6: Major revisions.
2021 4-15: Minor revisions.
2021 4-15: Accept.

初心丶 2021-06-08

Hello, is it possible to go directly from "with editor" to "major revision" in two months? Is there no "under review" status? I hope we can become friends. Please add me using the ID 2892593526.

IMORT 2021-06-08

I went from "with editor" to "under review" in just one day. Just received major revisions.

IMORT 2021-06-08

27 Apr 2021 Submitted
28 Apr 2021 With editor
07 Jun 2021 Major Revision

hfw6310 2021-06-07

Submitted at the end of December, received major revision notice 28 days after submission, returned 40 days later (delayed due to the Spring Festival, wasted my own time). Received minor revision email 1 month later, returned 15 days after that. Accepted in April, took the comments of the reviewers on major and minor revisions seriously, provided explanations and made corresponding modifications. Generally, it will pass.

小龙小龙 2021-06-06

How are you doing now, brother? I also applied around the same time, but there is still no news.

小龙小龙 2021-06-06

xdm
Submitted on May 26, 2021
With the Editor on May 27, 2021
Is it normal to have no updates so far?

uniqueabc 2021-06-05

Should I urge for submission? Urgent.

谭飞飞 2021-06-02

The speed is really fast, they rejected me in just four days, saying that the innovation is not enough. I feel like it might be because my English writing is not very good.

努力发SCI的东 2021-05-30

The editing process is fast, but the standards are confusing. My first paper was so poor, yet it was sent for review. The subsequent ones, whether in terms of experiments or discussions, were much stronger, but they were rejected instantly. Sigh, I don't know what the standards of this journal are, and the quality of accepted articles varies greatly.

smilesgly 2021-05-30

It has been over half a year since I submitted my manuscript, but the request for revision was rejected. The reviewer raised some inexplicable questions, sometimes saying that my paper is like a doctoral thesis, and other times claiming a lack of theoretical foundation. I really don't understand how their judgment was made. I have decided to submit my paper to another journal and will not send it to this journal anymore. I have no idea where they found these reviewers.