W786 2021-11-21

Employment after modification, wishing everyone good luck.

W786 2021-11-21

After revision, you are hired. Best wishes to everyone.

zhd_dave 2021-11-21

The tex file should be in the first position of the manuscript section.

zw 2021-11-20

Submit only reply letter and revised manuscript. You should have something else when creating the final PDF, and the revised manuscript should be editable.

嘻嘻哈哈jjy 2021-11-20

Can I add you as a friend? I would like to consult about the submission. After the first review, I will return the revised manuscript. The editor will send this message. What does "you are kindly requested to submit a single revised copy of the manuscript in either LaTeX/zip/docx format leaving behind the original submission" mean? I uploaded the modified .tex source file.

嘻嘻哈哈jjy 2021-11-20

The text means: "Submit the revised copy of the manuscript in either LaTeX/zip/docx format, excluding the original submission. What does '修改后提交' mean? I submitted a LaTeX file, hoping someone can answer."

嘻嘻哈哈jjy 2021-11-18

May I ask if "sent back to authors" means rejection?

嘻嘻哈哈jjy 2021-11-18

"May I ask if 'sent back to authors' means rejection?"

卡农max 2021-11-17

Update:
Friends, please make sure to carefully check for any editing errors in the manuscript. The editorial department may not necessarily format based on the submitted latex file. Once the proof is submitted, no elements in the manuscript can be modified anymore!

opd欧派 2021-11-16

Direction of data mining, I submitted two articles.
The first article was submitted on 3.14, edited and pre-reviewed on 3.21 but did not pass. It was then transferred to a certain journal which accepted and published it.
The second article:
Submitted on 5.08.
Edited and pre-reviewed on 5.30, requiring major revisions.
Revised on 6.10.
Extensively revised on 8.13 based on feedback from three experts, who provided 34 suggestions.
Revised again on 9.01.
On 11.12, one expert found no issues, another expert had unknown issues, and the third expert suggested minor revisions.
Revised again on 11.13.
Finally, accepted for publication on 11.16.

ida.wang 2021-11-15

November 14th, editor pre-review and major revision.

aimm 2021-11-11

Mine too, I submitted it at the end of September, and it is still "with the editor" at the moment. However, the middle date has changed, and it was just updated yesterday.

nicola 2021-11-11

I submitted it to the editor on October 28th, and I have not received any news so far. I don't know if it passed the preliminary evaluation.

支持天涯 2021-11-11

4.24 Submission
5.26 Editing and preliminary review
8.26 Major revision
11.1 Minor revision
11.11 Acceptance
The entire process took more than 6 months, relatively slow, almost delayed.

ida.wang 2021-11-10

I originally wanted to send an email to ask, but my teacher told me to wait a little longer. I don't dare to say or ask either.

Lyndsey 2021-11-09

Climbing up the same building, I have been submitting for over a month now, and it has consistently been "with the editor". What is going on?

renlantian 2021-11-09

It has been almost three months under review and I still haven't received any notification. I see that everyone else has received their notification within one to two months.

ida.wang 2021-11-09

Before, my senior sister also submitted to this journal, and she received the reviewer's comments in just 21 days. Maybe we were just unlucky.

asukjfa 2021-11-08

On September 29th, I will already be in the hands of the editor, without any pre-examination opinions or external reviews. Previously, I received a response within a month after submitting.

JINEY 2021-11-08

Hello, may I ask what steps are there after the acceptance of the paper? After acceptance, will the email be sent only to the corresponding author or will all authors receive the email?

zhd_dave 2021-11-08

I asked a senior fellow who has submitted to this journal before, and they said that the text posted by the original poster is probably raising questions about acceptance to the editor. In general, there is no need to worry about it. Just wait for the editor to send an email in response.

ida.wang 2021-11-08

10.2 Submission
10.5 with the editor
The status hasn't changed so far, everyone's is very fast, they have all been reviewed within 1-2 months. Why is mine so slow? I am considering whether to send an email to the editor to inquire about it. Annoying.

ZzzzYyyy 2021-11-08

I have encountered the same problem too. I don't know how to proceed with it in the future.

JINEY 2021-11-08

This sentence is also included in my acceptance notice. After clicking on the link, it leads to the homepage. May I ask what your next step is?
What are the steps after being hired?

libertyhhn 2021-11-04

This publication is good, and the first review is also quick, with friendly reviewers. However, there is an error on LetPub. This journal is a Q2 journal, not Q1!!! According to: https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr-jp/journal-profile?journal=APPL%20INTELL&year=2020

zhd_dave 2021-11-04

2021.05.10: Submission
2021.07.13: Major overhaul
2021.08.14: Major overhaul submission
2021.09.17: Minor revision
2021.10.10: Minor revision submission
2021.11.04: Accepted

I sympathize with the situation of the person on the 135th floor.

yumanman 2021-11-03

Thank you for the reply upstairs! The template is right on the homepage, you can see it!

潇女侠 2021-10-27

Submitted at the end of February, preliminary review ended in early April, revised for one week, first review ended at the end of June, two reviewers, major revisions were made mainly in terms of writing style. Second round of review results returned at the end of August, the second reviewer did not understand the innovative points, believed that there were issues with the methodology and experimental section, so the innovative points were highlighted in the article and explained. The revisions were completed in one week and accepted in early October. Overall, the journal was relatively lenient in handling the article. It was easy to meet the requirements of the reviewers with careful revisions. However, one thing worth criticizing is the extremely slow review speed. My article originally did not require major changes, and I personally believe that the innovative points and experiments were quite sufficient. In fact, there were no major changes made during the revision process. Unexpectedly, it took a total of 8 months from start to finish, spanning three semesters, directly delaying the scholarship evaluation and indirectly affecting job applications (resulting in the inability to list published articles on resumes, making many research institutes hesitant to consider during campus recruitment). It can be said that it had a certain impact on my life. They say that delayed justice is not justice, and I feel that the delayed review result cannot be considered a satisfactory outcome either. It was difficult to bear, but at least it was eventually accepted. I hope that reviewers can review as quickly as possible, because you never know how your delays affect the lives of the authors. We are all struggling, so let's have more understanding for each other. For students who are in a hurry to graduate or apply for scholarships, if you want to submit to this journal, I personally suggest leaving at least 9 months of time to be more secure, after all, not everyone is lucky.

111...hO 2021-10-23

Excuse me, where can I find the templates, big brothers?

三脚猫 2021-10-21

It is SCI;
It can be searched;
There is no difference, it is a special issue for a particular problem.