Verified Reviews - APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

特邀审稿人 2023-02-25

24 Feb 2023 Under Editor Decision

Translation: On February 24, 2023, the decision is pending from the editor.

Carmin 2023-02-24

What is the status now?

库拉索 2023-02-23

Trouble big brother to share a LaTeX template, at 760947483@qq.com

yangyang 2023-02-22

I will be six months pregnant soon, but I haven't received the first trial verdict yet. I don't know how to urge it.

yangyang 2023-02-22

I have been submitting for half a year and it is still under review. Should I remind them?

XieXS 2023-02-22

How is the progress going?

XieXS 2023-02-22

January 15th: submit
January 19th: with editor

吴豪 2023-02-20

1305411346qq.com Thank you for your big brother's sharing.

xx 2023-02-19

Already invested for 3 months, the situation is not good.

elainzaizai 2023-02-16

It has been three months since "Under Review," and there seems to be no progress at all...
Personally, I feel that this journal should be quite good, but the speed is worrisome.

xr1064 2023-02-16

Many people see more positive comments, but it does not mean it is easy, because generally only those who are accepted are in the mood to leave comments, while those who were not chosen are mostly unwilling to comment.

xr1064 2023-02-16

The review process takes six months, with the first half-month spent with the editor. After that, the decision to submit for review is made. That's how arrogant it is, as this publication does not lack articles!

xr1064 2023-02-16

I have a total of four reviewers. I think as long as one reviewer rejects, the editor might reject it too, because they receive many articles. I submitted it to this journal because my article was not accepted for a conference. It was also my first and last time submitting to this journal. Fortunately, I resubmitted this article to a CCF B conference, so the loss is not significant. If there is a time constraint, it is better to submit to a conference.

goddam_life 2023-02-15

Mine is like this, but some people may still have a minor revision, so the major revision needs to be modified and improved according to the requirements as much as possible; the reviewing time is uncertain, luckily for me, the second review was accepted in just over 20 days.

发发发中中中 2023-02-15

Hello, may I ask if the status of the second review goes directly from "under review" to "accept"? How long does the review process usually take?

szy1900 2023-02-14

Boss, how long did the review phase take? I know it's not very fast, but it seems like we can't find any other similar, faster journals either.

xr1064 2023-02-13

I don't know why the number of submissions to this journal suddenly increased in the past two years. Personally, I think this journal has a very low cost-effectiveness. Most submissions have to wait for about a month before they are considered for review or rejection. The rejection reasons are usually lack of novelty. Although there are only a limited number of articles published each year, the number of submissions is still around six or seven thousand, so you can just do as you please. Anyway, they don't lack articles, but there's nothing much to say about it.

Let's talk about the review process. Based on my personal experience, the reviewers for this journal are really hard to comment on (the quality of reviewers for average journals is also questionable). For example, my article is about supervised learning, and one of the reviewers actually commented that this article proposed a semi-supervised method. I doubt if they even read my article or if they just randomly provided comments. Perhaps they were not focused on reviewing during the Lunar New Year, as most of the comments were diplomatic. If they had just said that the article lacked novelty and rejected it directly, I wouldn't be upset! There are many journals at the same level to choose from, so I recommend being cautious if you are in a hurry!

goddam_life 2023-02-13

The luck is quite good, there are only two reviewers, and their comments are not difficult to reply to. The first reviewer requires language polishing, and the official polishing service is too expensive, so using a third-party polishing agency is also acceptable. It's possible to graduate on the spot, everyone, let's work hard and strive for an early acceptance!

goddam_life 2023-02-13

2022.9.19 submitted
2022.9.22 submitted (format issue, resubmitted)
2022.9.24 With the Editor (16 days)
2022.10.10 Under Review
2022.11.24 Major Revision
2023.01.19 Submitted
2023.01.20 Under Review
2023.02.13 Accept

XIAOYUEYUE 2023-02-12

Is there any reminder for the submission?

XIAOYUEYUE 2023-02-12

I have been under review for almost three months for my second trial.

XILOUYUE 2023-02-10

1982609371@qq.com, looking for a LaTeX template, thank you.

发发发中中中 2023-02-08

My first trial will be from May 17th, 22 to January 13th, 23... major renovation.

中中中123 2023-02-08

I have been under review for over 7 months. I have sent emails to urge, but the reply said that the reviewers are still reviewing. I can only wait.

科研汤 2023-02-08

May I ask if you can provide me with a LaTeX template? Thank you very much. 1552981316 @qq.com

Nixiakoay 2023-02-07

May I ask if the date of "under review" will change after major repairs?

szy1900 2023-02-04

February 4th under review Le

szy1900 2023-02-04

February 4th under review.

青青子衿 2023-02-03

May I ask if the editor needs to use the Springer Language Editing Service? Have you used it on your end?

Nixiakoay 2023-01-31

sous revue

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More