The Müller Award 2021-12-20

Because the information of people in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' division is closed.

This journal is the official journal of ISRM. The winners of the highest international award in rock mechanics, the Müller Award, Herbert Einstein, Nick Barton, and Peter Kaiser, are all members of the editorial board.

凡大大 2021-12-19

Excuse me, respected seniors, do we not need to write a recommendation letter for submitting to this journal?

不会写论文 2021-11-17

comments received: 5 May 2021
major revision submitted: 19 July 2021
accepted: 19 August 2021
published online: 9 September 2021

Translation:

comments received: 5 May 2021
major revision submitted: 19 July 2021
accepted: 19 August 2021
published online: 9 September 2021

More Papers More happy 2021-10-18

6.26 submitted
7.19 under review
9.27 major revision
9.30 revision submitted
10.17 accepted

Translation:
6.26 submitted
7.19 under review
9.27 major revision
9.30 revision submitted
10.17 accepted

赖杰 2021-10-04

1. Submitted, 2021.2.2
2. Editor Invited, 2021.3.2
3. Under Review, 2021.3.4
4. Reviews Completed, 2021.4.30
5. Major Revision, 2021.5.2
6. Under Review, 2021.7.25
7. Accept, 2021.9.17

黄佚名 2021-08-16

Reviewing takes four months, major revisions take one month, re-review takes one month, and publishing takes two weeks.

黄佚名 2021-08-16

The reviewer's comments were very detailed and thoughtful! After making the revisions, I received the acceptance notice in just one month.

CUMT_Lei 2021-07-24

The second article accepted on RMRE went through major revisions, minor revisions, and acceptance, taking a total of 8 months (the previous one took 9 months, including the time for major revisions). During the same period, there were also articles from other research groups that were accepted after completing the process in 6 months (major revisions, minor revisions, and acceptance). In general, it is normal for the "submitted" status to last for two weeks, and for the "with editor" status to last for 1 to 2 months, so everyone should not panic.

In addition, when encountering unhelpful reviewers, it is important to remain calm and maintain a professional and objective attitude. Provide reasoned responses to their comments. The associate editor still has the authority to accept your paper even if the reviewers do not recommend it. This was the case for my second article, which had two reviewers. One was extremely positive, but the other reviewer seemed to have almost no understanding of my paper. They pointed out that it had similar results to my previous paper and asked me to emphasize the novelty. In fact, I was devastated when I read their comments because it indicated that they completely misunderstood the direction of my research. As expected, this reviewer still recommended rejection after the major revisions. Fortunately, the responsible editor (Professor Jianchun Li from Southeast University) believed that my paper was not similar to the previous one and had novelty. They provided two suggestions for minor revisions, and after making the revisions and resubmitting, my paper was accepted.

abaaba 2021-06-28

2021-5-26-submitted;
2021-6-16-Editor Assigned;
2021-6-21-Under Review.

Additionally, is there a high probability of rejection by the peer reviewer after the "Under Review" stage?

Youngzhou 2021-06-26

This article was written during my first year of study, focusing on the research direction of mine safety. It was submitted in early January 2021 and received "Under review" status on February 3rd. In early March, it received feedback from the reviewer, suggesting one revision, one recommendation to submit to a mining journal, and one rejection. Ultimately, it was rejected. The editor, Professor Li Jianchun from Southeast University, responded quickly and did not delay the process. I realized that the rejection was due to the insufficient quality of my own article. After carefully revising the paper according to the reviewer's comments, it was resubmitted to the International Journal of Rock Mechanics and is currently under review. I hope for a positive outcome.

大康 2021-05-25

2021/05/23 Article accepted;

2021/01/30 Article revised;

2020/09/23 Article heavily revised;

2020/02/19 Initial submission of the article;

wwqqq 2021-05-24

Post on 2021-4-24, it has been a whole month today and it is still in the "Submitted" status. I even doubt if the submission was successful.

IJRMMS和RMRE 2021-05-13

submitted: 2020-12-12
editor invited: 2020-12-24
under review:2021-1-10
under review: 2021-1-27
review complete: 2021-3-30
major revision:2021-4-1
revision submitted: 2021-4-13
revision being processed: 2021-4-20
review complete: 2021-5-6
minor revision: 2021-5-7
revision submitted: 2021-5-8
editor invited: 2021-5-9
accept: 2021-5-12

Translation:
submitted: 2020-12-12
editor invited: 2020-12-24
under review: 2021-1-10
under review: 2021-1-27
review complete: 2021-3-30
major revision: 2021-4-1
revision submitted: 2021-4-13
revision being processed: 2021-4-20
review complete: 2021-5-6
minor revision: 2021-5-7
revision submitted: 2021-5-8
editor invited: 2021-5-9
accept: 2021-5-12

Dust_Evc 2021-05-05

Okay, thank you very much for your help!

sgnjnd 2021-04-30

From the email, it appears that there is a suggestion from a previous reviewer, which should be responded to!

yushuyang 2021-04-23

Hello buddy, would it be convenient to exchange contact information? After my repair, I have been in the "revision submitted" status.

Dust_Evc 2021-04-22

Excuse me, everyone, does anyone know if the revised draft will be returned to the original reviewer?

RUN-TMC 2021-04-20

2021-2-5 submission
2021-4-19 reject

The above text is already in English and does not require translation.

ljwyyn 2021-03-11

It has been one month since submission, and there has been no response.

不会写论文 2021-02-09

Received on January 7th, 2021.

不会写论文 2021-01-27

Received: 30 October 2017
Comments received: 19 January 2018
Accepted: 10 March 2018
Published online: 16 March 2018