Verified Reviews - APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

cc-thri 2022-09-28

Aug. 19 submit;
Sep. 10 under review;
Sep. 26 Required Reviews Completed

Previously, I have been criticizing this journal for being a "water-filling" publication, but now I feel a bit inadequate. This is my first work, and I hope for a good outcome. The waiting time for review was a bit long, but the reviewing speed was quite efficient.

Emily 2022-09-18

What was the final outcome? I also have "decision in process".

Frank710 2022-09-13

Posted on August 13th, 16th with editor. I originally planned to send an email after a month to ask about the situation, but it ended up under review on September 13th. This is too slow~~

旭老师 2022-09-13

It has been a month and a half since submission, and it is still under review. It is taking too long.

沦落而成美 2022-09-10

I submitted the second ACB manuscript, with the queue number 5301. It has been with the editor since August 27th. Have any foreigners also celebrated Mid-Autumn Festival? Has anyone recently submitted to this journal for review?

Zming 2022-09-02

The feedback has returned on August 27th. There are two reviewers, one minor and one major.

少年与梦- 2022-08-31

2022.8.11 Submission
2022.8.12 with editor
2022.8.27 under review
Anxiously waiting, this is the second time I'm submitting to ACB for my master's degree. I had one accepted before, hoping this time the editor will give me an opportunity.

Frank710 2022-08-31

Very slow speed, submitted on August 13th, with the editor on the 16th, still in the editor's hands on the 31st.

asdfghjkl 2022-08-23

Friend, we are the same. I have been waiting for the decision since August 12th.

asdfghjkl 2022-08-23

I have been reviewing the manuscript from July 2nd to August 12th, and so far I haven't received any feedback.

zqh1234556 2022-08-21

2022.07.26 Return for repair
2022.07.30 Under review
2022.08.18 Required reviews completed
2022.08.21 Accepted

liu2088 2022-08-21

It has been almost a month, and the first trial has not returned yet...

Zming 2022-08-15

8.13, Required Review Complete in English means "8.13, the required review is complete."

LIUyangyang525 2022-08-10

How many reviewers are there, please?

xiaohan W 2022-08-09

What happened afterwards? It has been 10 days for me too, and it has become "decision in process".

皮蛋瘦肉周周 2022-07-30

Received three positive and one negative review comments in the first review and was rejected. After appealing to the editor, I was given a chance to resubmit. I made revisions based on the first review comments and submitted it for re-evaluation. An additional reviewer was added, resulting in four positive reviews. After further revisions, the paper was accepted. This process was extremely challenging, with numerous review comments and the need to supplement a lot of experiments. Finally, a satisfactory result was achieved. I am grateful to the editor and the five reviewers.

拉粑粑小魔仙 2022-07-29

2022.07.06 submit
2022.07.09 under review
2022.07.25 required review complete
I hope there will be good news~

20220802 Reject, 3 reviewers, 2 rejections and 1 major revision, the editor gave a rejection, let's submit the next one.

liu2088 2022-07-29

2022.7.29 Under Review

liu2088 2022-07-26

Submission Experience:
2022.7.23 Submitted
2022.7.26 With Editor
.....

gongbingran 2022-07-24

2022.05.24 Submission
2022.06.16 First review comments
2022.07.15 Rejection
2022.07.22 Acceptance
The manuscript was quickly reviewed after submission. Many thanks to Professor Adrian M.T. Silva for his prompt handling of the process. There were three reviewers, two of whom provided positive feedback while one had more negative comments, but all provided valuable professional opinions. The editor allowed 30 days for revisions, during which routine experiments and calculations were supplemented. The revised manuscript was accepted one week after resubmission. The new article tracking system from Elsevier is very user-friendly, and I hope that the ACB journal continues to improve its impact and maintain high-quality submissions.

zunzun呀 2022-07-23

2022.05.12 Submission
2022.05.16 Rejected (The editor-in-chief raised several questions, requested revisions, and asked for resubmission)
2022.05.22 Resubmitted
2022.05.29 Under review
2022.06.23 Required reviews completed
2022.06.25 Revision requested
2022.07.09 Returned for revision
2022.07.14 Under review
2022.07.19 Required reviews completed
2022.07.23 Accepted

zqh1234556 2022-07-20

It should be soon, I haven't seen this status.

南宫灭 2022-07-20

"Greek Falaras Editor"

zunzun呀 2022-07-20

May I ask which editor it is?

南宫灭 2022-07-20

2022.3.8 submission,
2022.4.26 revision,
2022.6.5 submission (extended revision),
2022.6.19 revision,
2022.6.24 submission,
2022.7.9 accept
It is becoming increasingly difficult to submit to APCB, especially for groups without influential researchers in communication. It is not easy to have a paper accepted in this field.

金铃 2022-07-19

2022.3.29 Submitted
2022.5.19 Received reviewer comments
2022.2.28 Revised according to reviewer comments
2022.6.19 Paper accepted

2022-07-18

May I ask, how long does it take for your decision to be in process?

zqh1234556 2022-07-15

The following text translates to English as: "2022.6.30 required reviews completed."

zqh1234556 2022-07-15

Submission experience:
2022.5.18 submitted
2022.5.30 under review
2022.7.9 revise

zunzun呀 2022-07-14

May I ask which editor you are? Mine is also very slow.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More