Verified Reviews - Renewable Energy
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

zhanggy23 2021-05-19

I have never seen anyone more miserable than me. I have been submitting for 13 months, and it is still under review. The editor doesn't even respond to my request for withdrawal. Since it is my first doctoral paper, I am not in a hurry and didn't withdraw it earlier. Now, if I withdraw it, I will forget the details of the content even if I revise it again.

胡彻 2021-05-14

Super slow, speechless.

uT 2021-05-08

4.14 gave the first review result, which is a major revision. There were a total of four reviewers, and they were really meticulous, providing many comments. They had a sharp insight into the issues and their opinions were quite professional. The suggestions they made were aimed at helping the author improve the quality of the article. On May 7th, we just submitted a response to the first review. Hopefully, it will yield a positive outcome.

Bboy-Logic 2021-04-14

Do you have anyone to chase up my article? I don't even know who the editor is, how should I write this reminder letter? It has been 5 months and it is still under review.

123 2021-04-11

It has been 10 months, and still no result?

Aliyaa 2021-04-09

It has been 10 months, and still no results. Feeling miserable...

uT 2021-04-01

Translation: "If the rating is 3.9, it will show 'required reviews completed'. This status has been going on for almost a month now. Are there any fellow students who have experienced something similar?"

江亭sky 2021-03-19

Fortunately, I am not in a hurry. I submitted it in July 2020, and the first review is not yet completed. During the process, the "under review" status has changed more than ten times. It may be because the subject is too specialized.

shenxiu 2021-03-17

renewable energy 2.17 submission
2.25 under review
2.27 Changed date to 3.7
Date 3.12 required reviews completed 3.13 Decision in Process
3.16 rejected

Franciss 2021-03-15

Has your first instance opinion been received? My submission time is similar to yours, and there has been no response yet.

北齐伊白枫 2021-03-11

Posted on October 7th.

Franciss 2021-03-10

I submitted it on October 6th and it is still under review. I feel a bit scared.

Le-champagne 2021-03-10

Still relatively fast, this is my second article. Let's put more effort into it, everyone.
Submitted on October 28, 2020.
Received first round of comments on January 5, 2021. Two reviewers, one minor revision and one major revision, with a month given for revisions.
Replied to comments on January 25, 2021 (actual deadline was the 28th).
Second round of review started on February 2, 2021, estimated to have three weeks for revisions.
On February 23, 2021, it showed "Required review completed," possibly due to the editor being busy or only one set of comments received.
Accepted on March 9, 2021.

北齐伊白枫 2021-02-25

Submitted on October 7th, the first trial has not yet ended.

Franciss 2021-02-22

Posted on October 6th, we have not received any feedback from the first review yet.

虻虻 2021-02-22

From submission to acceptance took a whole 5 months. In the first round of major revisions, three external expert reviewers provided many suggestions, which greatly improved the quality of the article.

9.22 submitted
10.17 under review
11.17 major revision
12.15 r1 submitted
12.20 under review
1.22 minor revision
1.30 r2 submitted
1.31 with editor
1.31 under review
2.21 accepted

CHRNCHRNCHRN 2021-02-08

At that time, I randomly submitted hoping to submit to Applied Energy. After 5 months, I checked my mailbox and found that I had received a major revision reply. There were only two experts, and their opinions were not extensive, nor did they request any model changes. I showed it to my advisor who said it was actually similar to a minor revision. After making the necessary modifications, I submitted it again. After more than a month, they informed me that it was directly accepted, without even a minor revision. If you have any questions, feel free to consult!

沉思的托克维尔 2021-01-13

The text "zfyukm@126.com" is already in English. It is an email address.

Franciss 2021-01-12

When will you receive the feedback? Mine has been under review for a long time now. Can you please leave me your contact information?

沉思的托克维尔 2021-01-12

I am engaged in the field of traditional hydraulic machinery, which belongs to the utilization of water energy.

Renewable Energy is also a good journal in the industry, and the reviewers' comments are very fair, which is helpful for improving the quality of the articles. The only problem is that the review process is a bit slow.

北齐伊白枫 2021-01-08

Slowly, it has been three months. Is it because the situation of the pandemic in the UK is severe?

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started