共此明月光 2021-10-06

Received at Editorial Office: 6.7
Article revised: 8.24
Article accepted for publication: 10.4

It took approximately 4 months from submission, editorial processing, peer review, major revisions, to acceptance, with almost 6 weeks spent on the major revisions before the decision for acceptance was made.

The editor seems to have approached three reviewers, but only two agreed to review the article. Both reviewers provided positive feedback, with one describing it as a "truly stunning achievement" and the other as a "good job". The first article was accepted for publication in a top-tier journal in the field.

忠爱曼联 2021-10-04

I sent the reminder letter directly to the editor. However, it was mainly because it had been over 3 weeks since the second revision with the editor that I sent the reminder letter.

hanx 2021-10-03

Don't panic, my under review date has changed more than ten times orz.

Le-champagne 2021-09-30

Sorry, dialed the wrong number. The date for "Under Review" has been changed to half a month later.

Le-champagne 2021-09-30

2021.9.13 With Editor
2021.9.29 The date has changed once, but it is still With Editor. Can someone explain it to me? Normally, RENE's review process takes 1-2 months, but it has changed in just half a month. I looked it up online, and similar situations have resulted in rejection. I feel like I'm going to be tragic too.

胡彻 2021-09-29

Wrote a reminder letter, will it be rejected?

ManGo1 2021-09-28

I would like to ask if you send emails directly to the editor.

忠爱曼联 2021-09-23

The review process for "Renewable Energy" is indeed a bit slow, but the editors are very responsible. Writing a reminder letter might help speed up the process.

吉大郭富城 2021-09-11

Initial Date Submitted: 31/08/2022
10/09/2021 With editor
11/09/2021 Decision in Process
Rejected with sadness.

Franciss 2021-09-06

Posted on October 6, 2020, with multiple changes to "Under review" status. First major revision on June 17, 2021, with revised draft submitted on July 15. Changed to "Required Reviews Complete" on August 5, and received an acceptance email on the morning of September 3.

Alanhaha 2021-08-22

Did you send any letters to urge the editor during your period?

Franciss 2021-08-19

Calm down, I submitted my work in October last year, and the first review didn't end until June. Now I am waiting for the second review.

雕大吃四方 2021-08-19

After three months of review, there were 6 or 7 changes in the intermediate dates, which was quite frustrating. Other journals would have completed the review process with such changes.

胡彻 2021-08-04

Call on the Chinese people to boycott this trashy journal, it's a complete waste of time, still in the review process after 7 months.

胡彻 2021-08-04

It has been 7 months and there are still no results.

wind123 2021-08-01

After three months of submission, it is still being edited by the editor. It has been in the "with editor" status all this time. It's really slow!

xingxie 2021-07-28

Submitted to the journal on 25th February 2021.
Major revisions on 24th June 2021.
Accepted on 27th July 2021.

RENE's review speed is relatively slower compared to APEN and ECM, but the acceptance after 5 months of major revisions is completely acceptable. It is not considered slow. Moreover, the editor is very responsible and quickly sends the manuscript for review. After revisions, it is also quickly sent to the reviewers. The manuscript was accepted the day after the completion of required reviews. Thank you to the reviewers and editors for their diligent responsibility. Wishing RENE continued success.

Franciss 2021-07-19

What is the current status of the manuscript you revised?

大扬子 2021-07-06

Submitted in mid-November last year, the first round of review was completed a week ago (with major revisions). Just submitted the revised manuscript. Overall, the review process was quite slow.

Bboy-Logic 2021-06-26

I would like to ask Franciss, during such a long and anxious waiting period, have you sent any reminder letters? If so, how long after did you send them? I sent one reminder letter after 6 months, and they asked me to continue waiting.

Franciss 2021-06-24

Please wait patiently. I submitted it in October last year and it was just recently edited on June 17th this year.

胡彻 2021-06-24

Garbage, the speed is incredibly slow. This kind of magazine should be blocked. Subscribing to this magazine is simply a waste of time.

Dr_Dragon 2021-06-21

It takes five months to receive the result of submission. One reviewer recommended major revisions and the other rejected it, and the editor refused it. The main opinions can be modified, but the editor did not provide a chance within the five-month review period. Moreover, why did it take two reviewers five months to review? It is a waste of five months for nothing, so I won't consider it in the future.

林小伟hhh 2021-06-17

I waited for 12 months and was directly hired after a minor repair.

123 2021-06-17

Has my article been forgotten?

wulalalalala 2021-06-17

I am sorry, but I couldn't help but laugh out loud when I saw this message.

wind123 2021-06-10

I suggest that those who are in a hurry to graduate should not submit to this journal. The process is extremely slow, and even after two months of submission, it is still with the editor.

uT 2021-06-10

Submitted on 2.16, first review comments were received on 4.16. There were four reviewers who provided 89 comments. The revision period was one month, and the revised version was resubmitted on 5.7. It was directly accepted on 6.10. The speed was indeed a bit slow, and waiting was very anxious. However, the reviewers were quite professional. They sent reminder emails during the first review, and the associate editor had a good attitude. In conclusion, the result was good, so it was not bad.

胡彻 2021-05-31

The speed is extremely slow. I suggest not to invest in this magazine. It's better to invest in ECM energy.

xsyyt 2021-05-24

This condition has been going on for a month, I don't know if I should contact the editor. I'm getting a little anxious looking at it every day.