seuyyds 2022-10-30

Continuing with the editor at 10:30, it has been a month and a half already.

HIT晓 2022-10-26

If there is a significant difference in opinions between the two reviewers, generally a third reviewer will be asked to provide comments, rather than giving feedback to the one who rejected it (although it is possible to provide feedback to the one who rejected it as well, but not to you). I feel that there is still hope for your revision to be successful. I previously received one rejection and one major revision, and a third reviewer was given the manuscript.

Ziyi1994 2022-10-26

Encountering the same situation, one was rejected while the other required minor revisions, so will the person who received the rejection see the second review? Will additional reviewers be added?

Siend 2022-10-23

May I ask how your manuscript is doing now? Is it still with the editor?

Siend 2022-10-23

Excuse me, how are you doing now? Are you still with the editor?

Siend 2022-10-23

It has been 10 days with the editor, and the date has changed once in between, is this normal?

sinllay 2022-10-18

Is it normal to update four times in one month?

Siend 2022-10-16

2022.10.16 avec éditeur translates to "2022.10.16 with editor" in English.

密码错误 2022-10-14

with editor 2 more

Siend 2022-10-14

Electrochemical energy storage field
2022.10.11 Submit to Journal
2022.10.13 With Editor
...
Hoping for a good outcome ?

Ziyi1994 2022-10-10

May I ask how many times the date for "under review" has changed? I've already changed the date about 8 times, but the status is still "under review," and I'm starting to get a bit worried.

seuyyds 2022-10-10

I envy the speed of this review process.

seuyyds 2022-10-10

After the technical review did not pass, a resubmission was requested. Resubmitted on 9.11, with editor on 9.13, and there have been no changes until now.

sinllay 2022-10-09

9.13 with editor
9.16 under review
9.24 under review
10.2 under review
2023.1.21 rejected
After being reviewed for almost half a year by three reviewers, one rejected it, while the remaining two had no negative comments: one had 4 minor suggestions, and the other had 7 minor suggestions.
The editor still rejected it, as it took too much time.

ziyu 2022-10-01

No, in the journal system, it only shows "under review". It's too slow, still in the review process.

seuyyds 2022-09-29

Oh my, it's been so long, I thought I had finally made it through after half a month.

seuyyds 2022-09-28

Do you want to be with the editor for more than a month? My goodness.

Tim Luo 2022-09-23

I rrc for 12 days and then moved a little, but there has been no movement since.

Tim Luo 2022-09-23

I have been waiting for 12 days and still haven't received a response. The review process is quite fast, around 20 days or so.

Tim Luo 2022-09-23

The initial review was fast, but the required reviewers have been 12 days already, with one status change during this period. It feels a bit slow.

2234A 2022-09-23

Add a comment, the first review has been extensively revised, it has been three months since the second review, and there is still no news at all. It's ridiculously slow. Now even RENE is faster than EGY.

Jeremiahtz777 2022-09-21

How long does the first trial take?

木瓜123 2022-09-16

9.15投稿 translates to "Posted on September 15th."

123 2022-09-15

Modified twice, it took a total of 9 months.

lanpengyou 2022-09-08

Share it:
Submitted on 2.18, accepted on 9.7, the speed is okay, but this is based on the situation where there was no need for revision after the second review.

seuyyds 2022-09-04

2022.09.02 Submission successful
Waiting for editor, hoping for review

Mr.thermal 2022-09-02

Is this journal a feedback loop? It has the status of "decision in process".

Eliaukoi 2022-08-26

Does the manuscript tracking link show the review?

Eliaukoi 2022-08-26

Excuse me, did you receive the manuscript tracking link? Is it normal for no one to accept the manuscript for review for a whole month after it was sent to 2+ reviewers?

Eliaukoi 2022-08-26

Ah, I am also under review on this day. It is also about wind energy. May I ask if your link shows that there are reviewers for the review process?