2022科研狗 2023-05-06

Be cautious when submitting!!! I submitted in September 22 and it has been under review since. I can't even get my rejected manuscript back. I really don't know what to do. Can I withdraw my submission? I really don't want to wait anymore.

专利收割机 2023-04-26

High-quality journal, but why are all the sub-areas of the Chinese Academy of Sciences being classified as second-tier? I don't understand.

泣小雨 2023-04-17

Excuse me, does anyone know how long the review period given by this reviewer is?

飞鱼33 2023-04-11

Hello, have you been rejected?

ziyu 2023-04-06

Split up, go directly to the editor-in-chief!

飞鱼33 2023-04-05

May I ask how long your paper has been in the "with editor" status? My paper has been in this status for two months.

港岛妹妹 2023-04-05

It has been over a year, and it is still under review. Another junior sister in the group is also very slow... Be careful before investing.

JJJJSC 2023-04-02

I took a look at this journal and found out that the average review period is 6.8 months.

ziyu 2023-04-02

I reminded once, it was a reminder in February. I reminded through that submission system, but the person who replied was not an academic editor, and it felt like a generic response, not very helpful.

JJJJSC 2023-04-01

Do brothers have a manuscript reminder?

ziyu 2023-04-01

It has been eight months since the first review, but there is still no result... This journal is really outrageous...

JJJJSC 2023-03-31

It has been four months of reviewing, brothers. I have been waiting and feel like crying.

爸爸 2023-03-30

It takes about a year from submission to acceptance.
Stay patient, brothers, this journal is still good.

飞鱼33 2023-03-30

Many people share their experiences very quickly, but my "with editor" status has been two months now. Two days ago, I sent a reminder letter through Elsevier, but there has been no progress. The date has not changed at all. Sigh.

Jessie wu 2023-03-30

Accepted quickly

shakingj 2023-03-29

It has been three months with the editor already, consider carefully before submitting for speed.

LISA-田 2023-03-25

08/03/2023 Submitted to the journal
10/03/2023 with editor
24/03/2023 Decision in Process
I expect to receive a rejection email today or tomorrow.

Matthew&Donkey 2023-03-24

The speed of review is currently the fastest among the top journals I have submitted to. It only takes one month to receive the results. The reviewers are very professional and their feedback is very helpful for subsequent revisions of the paper!

Mikcyhyl 2023-03-13

2023.12.29 submit
2023.01.03 with editor
2023.01.13 reject
The editing process took almost half a month, which is quite slow. I thought it would be sent for review. If I submit to another journal in the same field, the rejection usually comes within two days. RE's response is indeed slower.

飞鱼33 2023-03-12

Original text: 楼主，一样啊。我也是2023年1月30号with editor，一直到现在状态不变，日期不变

Translation: Original poster, same here. I also have been "with editor" since January 30, 2023, and the status has remained unchanged, the date has not changed.

HopentV 2023-03-11

2023/01/30 with editor until now, it has been too slow.

飞鱼33 2023-03-06

OP, how is the status of your paper?

村头烧烤 2023-03-04

It seems like only a few days in the W E phase, and we have entered the U R phase.

snow merry 2023-03-02

Excuse me, how long did it take for the author with the editor? It took me three months, is it hopeless now?

村头烧烤 2023-02-28

Additional details:
Received on October 26, 2022,
Revised on January 14, 2023,
Received on February 21, 2023,
Online on February 22, 2023,
Completed on February 27, 2023.

snow merry 2023-02-26

Hello, my 1.3 with editor, up until now, there has been no news. How are you doing?

liuqb 2023-02-25

The thing I want to know is the manuscript number.

村头烧烤 2023-02-24

I just finished proofreading last night. Once it is published online, I will give you the DOI.

村头烧烤 2023-02-24

Switch to fuel.

sinllay 2023-02-24

9.13 with editor
9.16 under review
9.24 under review
10.2 under review
2023.1.21 reject

After being reviewed for nearly half a year by three reviewers, one rejected it, while the remaining two reviewers had no negative comments: one had 4 minor suggestions, and the other had 7 minor suggestions. However, the editor still decided to reject it, as it had taken too long.