HITcui 2022-08-04

On the second day of my employment, my supervisor (communication) received the agreement email, which was only sent to communication, including the school draft as well.

annhappy 2022-08-03

After the notice of employment, how many days should the author be notified to sign the copyright agreement? Is it only the corresponding author who should be notified?

HITcui 2022-08-02

7.13 Evaluating reviews - The process of assessing or analyzing reviews.
7.13: Major revision - A significant modification or alteration.
7.18 Inviting for Review - Requesting someone to review or assess something.
7.19 Assigning for Review - Designating or allocating something to be reviewed.
7.25 Under review - Currently being assessed or analyzed.
7.29 Evaluating reviews - The process of assessing or analyzing reviews.
7.29 Accept - To approve or agree to something.

annhappy 2022-08-02

April 23 submission
June 8 minor revision
One week has passed since the minor revision was submitted, the status is Selecting for Review.

xixixi~ 2022-06-08

Was it published two months after receiving it? Can I ask if it has been published now?

尧遥 2022-06-06

Admiration, I also have a revision on May 24th (the reviewer said it's a major revision, but it feels like a minor one), and until now, it is still assigning for review.

chenyingxi 2022-06-06

2022 Submission Record
3/31 submit
4/1 (Morning) selecting for review
4/1 (Evening) Assigning for review
5/9 Minor revisions based on initial review comments
5/24 Revision due to personal reasons, took half a month to complete. Same day status: selecting for review, Assigning for review
5/25 Same day status: selecting for review, Assigning for review
6/1 Further editing required to add citations, possibly insufficient in quantity, more revisions needed. However, the revision should be for the reviewer to review again, as the reviewer has responded with modifications.
6/4 Delayed due to the Dragon Boat Festival holiday, took two days to add citations, resubmitted
6/5 Received acceptance email around 11:20 PM (around the same time as on 6/1), Accept!
The submission process for this paper was very long because it was rejected by several reputable journals before finally being accepted.

HITcui 2022-06-01

5.29 Assigning for Review
6.1 Under review

Translation:
5.29 Assigning for Review
6.1 Under review

chenyingxi 2022-05-31

Has the repair been completed?

尧遥 2022-05-30

under review means that it has been sent for external review. I am also in the assigning for review status after a major revision, and I have been waiting for a long time. I still have to wait for external review afterwards.

比风遥远 2022-05-30

Is the external audit status "Under review"? Is the "Under review" status for editing review or external audit?

比风遥远 2022-05-30

Is the external audit status "Under review"? Is the "Under review" status for editing review or external audit?

HITcui 2022-05-28

5.28 Asignación de Editores

5.28 Assigning Editors

HITcui 2022-05-27

Posted on 5.27, follow-up updates.

AFEU 2022-05-24

The expert raised a small issue, after a minor fix, he was hired directly.

猫猫 2022-05-17

4.6 Submission
4.29 Rejection
Upon checking the email, it was discovered that only one reviewer provided feedback for major revisions.
The editor mentioned that the journal currently has a high impact factor and can only accept 25% of the submissions. Due to the article's low rating, it has been rejected.

zsccn 2022-05-09

3.20 Submission
4.14 Minor revision
5.3 Repairs
After the repairs, it has been continuously assigned for review. Do we need to submit the revised version for approval? What does that mean?

sddsdssd 2022-04-24

It has been three and a half months since I submitted it. I just changed the status to "Evaluating reviews"... How much longer do I have to wait? I will graduate in May...

董文勇 2022-04-20

投 means "to invest" or "to put in", 未有 means "not yet", and 结果 means "result".

Therefore, the translation of 已投未有结果 into English is "Invested but no result yet."

Luke Xie 2022-03-04

Posted on December 2, 2021; received revision suggestions (major revision) on December 30, 2021, from two reviewers. The suggestions were difficult to address, so I read a lot of literature in between. Submitted revised manuscript on February 26, 2022; received acceptance notification on March 3, 2022. Published two months later. The fastest process from submission to acceptance.

Jinyan Ning 2022-01-25

Submit a message to modify after one month, and submit it again after modification, saying it's okay, and ask to cite their article. After I modified the references and submitted, they instantly rejected me... What does this mean? Going back and forth for months like this is really ridiculous.

houxiaoka 2022-01-19

On December 18, major repairs were made, and a week later, it was returned for further repairs. During the New Year period, I received a job offer notification. The efficiency was very high, and the chief editor and editors were very good. Thumbs up to the journal and best wishes for its continuous improvement.

低介电小虫子 2022-01-02

The editors are really nice. They sent me an acceptance email on New Year's Day. I hope the journal will continue to improve!

Luke Xie 2021-12-31

Received revision suggestions on December 30th, 2021, less than a month after the review, given two months for revisions.

houxiaoka 2021-12-12

December 12th has become "Under review."

houxiaoka 2021-12-09

Posted on November 24th, currently waiting for news.

Luke Xie 2021-12-02

Posted on December 2, 2021, wait for news, and will provide updates later.

张丽娜娜 2021-11-04

"Before making a decision, I want to ask first."

吃瓜群众小陈 2021-10-14

The translation of the text is as follows: "I was quite lucky, as I got hired directly after only a month of applying. However, the journey was quite bumpy, as I started by submitting to higher-ranked journals."

科研民工1988 2021-10-09

2.3: Article submission
2.8: Assigned for review
2.15: Under review
3.7: Evaluating reviews
3.10: Under review
4.6: Major revision of the article, which focuses on the research of plastic toughening and flame retardant mechanisms. Two reviewers provided feedback. One reviewer requested further explanation and exploration of the data, emphasizing the advancement of the article compared to previous results. The other reviewer requested further characterization and research on the mechanisms of the article.
5.18: Carefully revised the manuscript according to the reviewer's comments and returned it.
6.7: Received acceptance notification for the article
After a four-month process, the article was finally accepted. It was a lengthy and painful experience. I feel that this journal does not have particularly high requirements for innovation, but it is a well-established magazine under the sponsorship of the American Society of Plastics Engineers. It seems that the reviewers are relatively junior colleagues with limited influence outside their field. I hope this journal continues to improve.