Verified Reviews - PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

alivedeng 2023-01-20

The first submission and the chief editor made four rounds of formatting revisions and suggested polishing. After resubmission, it is now directly under review. It only took three days to find a reviewer after the submission was made. Waiting for the results. The fluidity is excellent, and both the influence and status are top-notch without a doubt. Self-citation is appropriate, but it may seem a bit excessive.

Karen4543fdsv 2023-01-20

Hahaha, guys, I'm just kidding. POF must be in the top 2! Let's support it, hahaha.

muji12138 2023-01-16

After all, it was once the TOP2 (controversial) that was created from Kim's departure and caused a surge in PRF. Now, it can only strive within the top 5. It's quite interesting to think about.

MissU 2023-01-15

I feel that the top 5 fluids, excluding the annual review, are: JFM, PRF, POF, EiF.

Karen4543fdsv 2023-01-12

I don't know, haha, JFM seems to be the boss, I don't know much about the others.

酒心不是酒 2023-01-11

May I ask which are the top five fluid mechanics journals you mentioned?

Karen4543fdsv 2023-01-08

The review process of POF is a bit excessive. I was assigned to review an article that is not within my field of expertise. I rejected it due to its poor quality, but then I was asked to make major revisions. It's frustrating.

hylb3020 2022-12-25

Three reviewers have been found and the review process has started.

hylb3020 2022-12-16

It has been 8 days since submission. The editor started looking for reviewers on the third day, and now it's the sixth day and no one has been found yet.

小飞侠KILLER 2022-12-09

Editorial processing is fast and the reviewers' comments are professional.

GDJ 2022-12-05

Associate Editor Review - 04-Dec-2022 15:10:14
Review Started - 04-Dec-2022 05:40:26
Securing Reviewer(s) - 04-Dec-2022 05:40:26
Review Received - 04-Dec-2022 03:54:20
Associate Editor Review - 03-Dec-2022 06:10:12
Securing Reviewer(s) - 03-Dec-2022 05:27:35
Associate Editor Review - 01-Dec-2022 22:10:10
Securing Reviewer(s) - 01-Dec-2022 21:19:47
Associate Editor Review - 30-Nov-2022 06:10:12
Securing Reviewer(s) - 30-Nov-2022 05:22:05

GDJ 2022-11-28

Associate Editor Review 26-Nov-2022 14:10:11
Securing Reviewer(s) 26-Nov-2022 13:18:47
Associate Editor Review 26-Nov-2022 13:10:15

学术圈打工人 2022-11-24

The third submission from our research group has finally been accepted. We are grateful to the journal for continuously improving.

江上一捕鱼的 2022-11-24

The first round of review, with four reviewers, raised very professional questions, mostly regarding the physical mechanisms. They did not ask for additional experiments. I hope to receive the results within a month. It is a very good journal in the field of fluid dynamics.

wnengyg 2022-11-21

Student Graduation Magazine~~~ Doesn't matter if it's water-like or not, as long as there are articles.

南天问月 2022-11-16

Since you think it's a water journal, why did you invest in it?

南天问月 2022-11-16

Yesterday I was notified of the second review, and today I received an email saying that I have been accepted. It's quite amazing. Overall, the review comments were professional, and the efficiency was high. It was a very good submission experience. With this, it comes to an end, and there may still be some minor things like formatting that need to be modified later.

GDJ 2022-11-16

Translation:

Review Started: 11-Nov-2022 15:33:01
Securing Reviewer(s): 11-Nov-2022 15:33:01
Associate Editor Review: 11-Nov-2022 14:10:11
Securing Reviewer(s): 11-Nov-2022 13:24:3

GDJ 2022-11-16

Review Started 11-Nov-2022 03:29:28
First Reviewer Secured 11-Nov-2022 03:29:28
Securing Reviewer(s) 11-Nov-2022 03:29:28
Associate Editor Review 11-Nov-2022 01:10:11
Securing Reviewer(s) 10-Nov-2022 22:43:55
Associate Editor Assigned 10-Nov-2022 10:54:44
Editor Assigned 10-Nov-2022 10:54:44
Manuscript Submitted to Journal Office 10-Nov-2022 10:54:44
Submission Check by Journal Office Completed 10-Nov-2022 10:54:44

Translation:
Review Started - November 11, 2022, 03:29:28
First Reviewer Secured - November 11, 2022, 03:29:28
Securing Reviewer(s) - November 11, 2022, 03:29:28
Associate Editor Review - November 11, 2022, 01:10:11
Securing Reviewer(s) - November 10, 2022, 22:43:55
Associate Editor Assigned - November 10, 2022, 10:54:44
Editor Assigned - November 10, 2022, 10:54:44
Manuscript Submitted to Journal Office - November 10, 2022, 10:54:44
Submission Check by Journal Office Completed - November 10, 2022, 10:54:44

GDJ 2022-11-16

Manuscript Submitted to Journal Office: 10-Nov-2022 10:51:21
Awaiting Author Adjustment/Approval of Converted Files: 10-Nov-2022 10:51:13
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted: 07-Nov-2022 21:50:47

yancy东 2022-11-15

If the quality of your article is sufficient, then it is not a low-quality publication.

yancy东 2022-11-15

I don't know why some people diss POF, if you don't want to submit to POF, go submit to JFM. Anyway, based on my experience with this submission, it's great. There were four reviewers, the difficulty of the questions was moderate, and I received 50 pages of review comments in the end, which was a sufficient amount of work. Additionally, the turnaround time was fast, and the entire editing and reviewing process was efficient. Regardless, POF is at least a top 5 journal in fluid mechanics, it's outstanding!

南天问月 2022-11-15

Submitted the revised draft, currently securing reviewers, not sure if it's in the second review. Let's wait for news, just making a note.

GDJ 2022-11-10

Post on November 10, 2022, just recording it.

南天问月 2022-11-01

My review time is one month, and now I have received revision suggestions.

南天问月 2022-11-01

The comments on the manuscript have been received. The editor and three reviewers find the paper generally acceptable and suggest minor revisions. The revision process will take 20 days.

上头了 2022-10-29

Already hired, after submitting the manuscript, it took one month to receive the review comments. The comments were not very professional, and after revising, it was accepted within ten days. I feel like the reviewers we found were particularly lenient, with a self-citation rate of over forty percent. Has it really become a low-quality journal?

太空挖矿 2022-10-28

Found the first one, still looking, maybe none of the recommended reviewers were chosen.

Mchen 2022-10-27

Same ah, it's already the third day, I have been continuously searching for reviewers, constantly switching between Associate Editor Review and Securing Reviewer(s).

offshore 2022-10-19

It seems that the feedback for repair was sent in the form of an email to the communication department. It is indeed not present in the system.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation