Verified Reviews - PATTERN RECOGNITION
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

一审通过 2022-04-10

2021/8/6 Submitted to Journal
2021/8/10 With Editor
2021/8/14 With Editor
2021/10/20 Under Review
2021/10/27 Under Review
2021/11/3 Under Review
2021/11/30 Major Revision requested, to be resubmitted by 2022-1-29
Requested extension of 1 month to submit by 2022-02-28
2022/2/23 With Editor
2022/3/10 Required Reviews Completed
2022/3/11 Decision in Process
2022/3/12 Minor revisions
2022/3/15 With Editor
2022/3/21 Under Review
2022/4/5 Required Reviews Completed
2022/4/6 Decision in Process
2022/4/8 Decision in Process
2022/4/10 Completed - Accept

我是一条鱼 2022-04-05

Brother, you are too fast. It has been over a year and Xiao Xiu still hasn't replied to me.

小超超~ 2022-04-04

September 5, 2021 - Submitted to journal
September 6, 2021 - With editor
October 22, 2021 - Under review
November 26, 2021 - Required Reviews Completed
December 6, 2021 - Decision in process
December 12, 2021 - Revise
February 18, 2022 - Submit revision
February 19, 2022 - With editor
March 1, 2022 - Under review
March 11, 2022 - Required Reviews Completed
March 13, 2022 - Required Reviews Completed
March 13, 2022 - Decision in process
March 15, 2022 - Minor revise
March 20, 2022 - With editor
March 21, 2022 - With editor
March 22, 2022 - Decision in process
April 2, 2022 - Decision in process
April 3, 2022 - Completed-Accepted

小超超~ 2022-03-28

After the minor revision was submitted, it was with the editor for two days, and then it has been "decision in process" for seven days. There is still no result now.

setBossTrue 2022-03-26

I remember that it was written in the PR submission guidelines, isn't it? It is not recommended to send any form of reminders within 3 months, as this might annoy the editors and increase the rejection rate.

小超超~ 2022-03-25

May I ask if after giving Xiaoxiu, do you send emails to all the authors if they accept?

一审通过 2022-03-24

I also passed the second review as one reviewer approved, while another reviewer raised a few minor issues. The editor made some minor revisions. May I ask how the results were after the revisions?

joy_me 2022-03-22

12.08 submit; 03.22 reject
The reviewer may not be particularly professional, but they are a big shot in the field. They did point out some flaws that I didn't handle well. Also, they complained that the method is a bit outdated. Nowadays, it's all about deep learning. T-T

运气爆好 2022-03-21

Did you send any follow-up emails to the editor during the period of your paper being under review since March 15th?

运气爆好 2022-03-21

I have never written a reminder email to the editor. I have been working on target detection for over two months now, and it is still with the editor. Because everyone says this journal is slow, I don't know whether I should send an email to remind them or not.

两对半 2022-03-17

What specific direction are you talking about? It is very niche and hard to find reviewers.

阿姆斯特朗 2022-03-16

It's too difficult, buddy. Have you ever sent an email to urge?

运气爆好 2022-03-15

It has been two months since I got it, and I am still with the editor.

阿姆斯特朗 2022-03-15

My submission has been with the editor for almost a month, still.

Lst发SCI啊 2022-03-15

Submitted in mid-December with editor
Under review as of March 15th

Too slow, too slow

joy_me 2022-03-09

Is it normal within 45 days?

mlgm97 2022-03-08

It took a little over a month from under review to decision. This speed feels quite slow.

一审通过 2022-03-04

Yes, I also requested two reviewers for the second review.

我是一条鱼 2022-03-04

I am the same, both have gone through the second review with the editor, and it has been over a month.

运气爆好 2022-03-03

I'm the same, always with an editor. It's too slow.

DLY_FF 2022-03-02

Hello, do you have any news?

DLY_FF 2022-03-02

+1, it's the same.

Lst发SCI啊 2022-03-01

Why is the speed so slow? I submitted the paper in mid-December 2021, and it is already March 1st, but it is still "with editor." Is nobody handling it?

Xbh 2022-03-01

If there is a major revision, the editor will consider adding more reviewers based on the review comments.

The Answer 2022-03-01

The translation of the text into English is:

"On my first attempt, there were only two reviewers, but now that I have made the necessary changes, I realize that I need to recommend additional reviewers."

jack21 2022-02-26

Recommended reviewers should be added after February. If there are not many comments in the first round of revisions, it may not be necessary to find new reviewers.

zzh1995 2022-02-20

2022.1.1 under review
2022.1.16 under review
2022.1.24 required reviewers completed
2022.1.28 required reviewers completed
2022.2.16 decision in process
2022.2.19 decision in process
2022.2.20 major revision
2022.4.22 revision submitted
2022.4.26 under review
2022.5.4 required reviews completed

小超超~ 2022-02-19

May I ask why it is necessary to recommend reviewers when replying to the second review?

小超超~ 2022-02-19

Hello, may I ask why the second review still needs to recommend reviewers?

我是一条鱼 2022-02-18

Normal, both with editor and required reviews completed, the status is long.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started