Verified Reviews - OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

科研狗97 2021-11-10

I am a few months old, then two reviewers directly rejected me. However, the questions raised were very professional and targeted. I plan to make revisions and submit to other journals.

sci给个回复吧 2021-11-04

This means "Speaking of which, it has been an average of 3 months since I submitted it, I'm afraid it's dragging behind. I submitted it on July 24th and still haven't received the initial review result. The deadline has been changed twice in between, and it's just been under review all this time. Sigh..."

HaHa... 2021-10-17

Ask. Didn't see the standard template, do I not need to format the revised draft? Thank you for your response.

AntonR 2021-10-14

After one week of submission, I received a reference number. It took another week to be reviewed. After two months, it was rejected by two reviewers. Both of them mentioned that there is room for improvement, but the editor still rejected it. In this situation, is it still possible to start over?

莲子 2021-10-07

I was also rejected for the same reason.

让我中吧 2021-10-06

Mine too, I'm exhausted. It's already May and the reviewing process is still ongoing. The external review has also been with the editor for over a month. I had to send a reminder letter to get the external review done. I'm so frustrated.

时光流逝 2345 2021-10-05

The review process can be said to be very slow. Be cautious when submitting. The submission was made in May, and half a month later it was sent for review. It is still in the review status until now. A reminder letter was sent once during this period, but no one replied.

olivercoco 2021-10-03

Excuse me, did the original poster get rejected after submitting for review?

莲子 2021-09-23

It is said that it does not meet the scope of the journal for submission, but I see many similar articles.

i-chanel 2021-07-31

Do I need to check for plagiarism for this journal?

模多林中队长 2021-07-30

The difference is not significant, usually it takes about one to two weeks for processing.

Windy 2021-07-30

Does this editor only work on Mondays?

让我中吧 2021-07-30

The translation of the text into English is: "The speed is very slow. If there is no hurry, you can invest."

Windy 2021-07-29

How long have you been with the editor? Mine has also been continuously submitted to the journal. Also, when you chose an editor, did you select the chief editor or the deputy chief editor?

Windy 2021-07-28

When everyone submits their contributions, we need to designate an editor. Would it be faster if we choose the associate editor or the editor-in-chief to handle it?

让我中吧 2021-07-12

How long did it take to review the manuscript?

cumter 2021-07-07

2.24 submitted to journal
6.24 published online

It took exactly four months from submission to online publication, which feels quite fast. The initial review time was a bit long (but still acceptable), and after the major revision (5.27), it didn't take long (6.9) for the editor to give acceptance. The processing speed of the journal editor feels very fast, as time is mostly dependent on the reviewers' review time. This is my second article that I have written, but the first one is still under review. Overall, I recommend everyone to submit to this journal.

让我中吧 2021-06-16

I also want to know. Who should the recipient of the reminder letter be? It's too slow.

嘻嘻哈哈毕了业 2021-05-17

In the second trial, there is still no news.

羌笛胡马 2021-05-17

Did you urge it? I have also been investing for some time and still in this state.

LOUIS RW 2021-05-15

Brother, is there any result yet?

binbindu 2021-04-26

Without a template, you can start by modifying the template of another journal, and the editing team will format it for you later.

西门吹雪-上海 2021-04-24

My article has been submitted for almost a month now, why is it still "submitted to journal"? There isn't even a manuscript number. Can I follow up with the editor on this?

西门吹雪-上海 2021-04-24

My article has been submitted for almost a month, why is it still "submitted to journal"? There isn't even a manuscript number.

嘻嘻哈哈毕了业 2021-04-21

Does this journal require typesetting for the second review? I didn't see a template.

嘻嘻哈哈毕了业 2021-04-13

Hello, may I ask how to format and typeset the thesis during major revisions?

fwrw 2021-04-09

I just don't understand why Indians and Bangladeshis can freely publish articles in various journals! Some of those articles are really unbearable to look at.

3www2 2021-01-27

Relatively speaking, it's quite good. Combined with other achievements in the same field, the level of the journal is about at the third tier. The only advantage of the journal is that its impact factor is quite high. I don't know how it operates, haha!

binbindu 2021-01-11

It took a total of 56 days from submission to acceptance. The updates on the article were only sent to the corresponding author. During this period, there were major and minor revisions, and the overall speed was relatively fast. It took 5 days to make the final decision.

JTULaser 2021-01-07

I am speechless about this journal. The entire review process took almost 6 months. I received feedback from two reviewers, totaling four comments. The first reviewer provided three comments for major revisions, while the second reviewer rejected the paper with one comment. The only positive aspect is that the editor, Song Zhang, was very proactive in responding throughout the whole process.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started