Verified Reviews - OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

黄小旺 2023-04-10

When will you be under review?

Andy 2023-04-10

Please be cautious when submitting the article urgently.

Andy 2023-04-10

Still with editor until now.

etta 2023-03-31

Initial Date Submitted: Aug 1x, 2022
one review completed: Oct 2x, 2022
rejected: Mar 0x, 2023

Translated text:
Initial Date Submitted: August 1x, 2022
One review completed: October 2x, 2022
Rejected: March 0x, 2023

Andy 2023-03-28

2023.2.18 Submitted
2023.2.26 With editor
Still with editor to this day.

别卷 2023-03-28

Extremely slow!!!
Submitted to journal on March 03, 2023
With editor on March 04, 2023
No response from the editor until now.

达达达令 2023-03-16

Too slow!
Submitted on 12th July 2022
Second review submission on 8th January 2023
There's still no news until now, it's been almost a year!!!

htbhyk 2023-03-16

2022.4 Submission for review
2022.8 Reminder sent once
2022.9 Reviewer's feedback: Rejection
The process took nearly 6 months.

zaodianbiye 2023-03-16

12.27 Submission
12.29 With editor
12.30 Under review
1.13 Required reviews completed
2.1 Major revisions
2.15 Returned
3.4 Minor revisions
3.13 Returned
3.14 Accepted

The required reviews took a relatively long time, possibly due to conflicting opinions from two reviewers. Another reviewer was then sought. Overall, the process was relatively fast. The final minor revisions were delayed due to unforeseen circumstances. The manuscript was accepted the day after submission. Best wishes for the journal's continuous improvement!

临时演员 2023-03-13

Just posted the article and the status was updated immediately!
Feb 06, 2023 with editor
Feb 12, 2023 with editor
Mar 13, 2023 UR
Entered into a long wait.

临时演员 2023-03-13

Feb 06, 2023 With Editor
Feb 12, 2023 With Editor----Until now
You can imagine how slow it is...

黄小旺 2023-03-12

If the OLT journal is not reviewed for a long time, withdraw the submission immediately. I personally didn't get it reviewed for four months and then withdrew it. Afterward, I resubmitted it, but it took another two months without review, and then they rejected it directly, stating that I had previously submitted something similar.

kdjcsu 2023-02-24

The review process is also very slow, and it has been three months without inviting any reviewers. We have already applied for withdrawal.

azw 2023-02-22

I also only gave one suggestion. May I ask how did you know there were other reviewers? Did you send an email? Thank you.

吴女士 2023-02-21

You have been slow these two months, but I haven't had any opinions for over four months.

吴女士 2023-02-21

I was deceived. At that time, when I looked at the comments, they all said it was fast.

吴女士 2023-02-21

Received a link, asking the author to confirm.

吴女士 2023-02-21

It's really too slow. I feel like the direction is not quite compatible. For my October submission, one expert has provided review comments, and I have also responded to them. However, unbelievably, there are still two reviewers who haven't given their opinions yet. I am truly amazed. They even want to provide their opinions in batches!!!!

j-liu 2023-02-21

Be cautious when rushing to graduate, as I have submitted my manuscript for over four months without even receiving the first round of comments.

吴女士 2023-02-08

Received expert review comments on January 9, 2023, still waiting, really afraid of rejection.

吴女士 2023-02-08

Received expert review comments on January 9, 2023.

吴女士 2023-02-08

Received expert review comments on January 9, 2323.

bajini95 2023-02-06

Submitted on December 5th, 2022, for review before Christmas by two reviewers. Received major revisions email on January 10th, made revisions on February 1st, and it was accepted directly after review by the editor! It went quite smoothly!

dukaix 2023-01-18

Does this journal seem to pay for reviews? Trust me if you're in a hurry to publish your paper, stay away from this journal. The longest review period is one year and one month for the first review.

Anboyu 2022-12-19

2022/11/20 Submission
2022/12/10 Rejection

This journal is said to have a particularly slow external review process and has high requirements for theoretical innovation in manuscripts.

Shan Shan 2022-12-11

7.22 Submitted to Journal
7.31 Under Review
9.28 Major Revise
10.28 Submitted to Journal
11.14 Under Review
12.6 Required Reviews Completed
12.8 Decision in Process
12.11 Accept

The process took longer to find reviewers for the first review, but the rest went relatively smoothly. Wishing the journal continued success.

大企鸭 2022-12-11

The review process is very fast. I submitted it on October 20th and received the review comments on November 8th. There were two reviewers in total. After carefully revising for a month, I submitted it on December 6th and it was accepted on the 8th. It has already been upgraded to Tier 2. Let's keep up the good work.

azw 2022-12-06

Congratulations, OP. Have others received tracking links? I haven't received any.

wz2020 2022-12-05

translate the following text into English: 12.5 morning under review one person did not accept the review for revision
12.5 afternoon Review Complete still one person did not accept the review for revision, possibly the editor waited too long and directly entered the decision state
12.5 afternoon accept

yorelll 2022-12-05

Is there any new message?

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now