Verified Reviews - Ocean Engineering
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

GDJ 2022-09-20

Just before, I was serving as a reviewer for OE, so I directly accepted it and the reviewer suggested adding a few concepts.

旅人 2022-09-20

Okay, thank you.

Dabang250kg 2022-09-20

For the first submission, you can roughly follow the font format in the published paper, as long as it is clear and does not affect the reading of the editor and reviewers. The final editing will make adjustments or inform you how to adjust it.

发SCI的小白 2022-09-19

Civil engineering direction, but there have been no updates since it changed to "Required Reviews Completed" on the 14th.

旅人 2022-09-19

Hello, I would like to ask if there is a template for the formatted Word document to submit to OE.

旅人 2022-09-19

I want to ask, are the formats of OEword version edited and corrected by professionals?

舞动的风铃6345 2022-09-19

Thank you. Zhou received the comments from the second review. One reviewer had no comments, while the other provided six suggestions. As everyone mentioned, it seems that the editor-in-chief has been overwhelmed with manuscripts recently, causing a delay in making decisions. The result will be released in a week, and we are asked to make revisions before October 1st. (The second review was completed within a week, but the editor-in-chief took an additional week to make a decision.)

offshore structure 2022-09-19

Required reviews completed and lasted for 5 days. Based on online research, the duration of this status is entirely dependent on luck, ranging from 1 to 20 days. It depends on whether the editor is busy or the number of pending manuscripts. Do not blindly rush the manuscript.

Overall, the first review takes over 40 days, and the entire process takes about 3 months. The speed of review depends on how easy it is to find reviewers in that field.

OE is a British journal, so based on my experience, it seems that the editor mostly handles manuscripts around 4-6 am Beijing time. I understand everyone's eagerness to know the status of their manuscripts, so I suggest checking the paper's status after waking up. Good luck is always with you!

offshore structure 2022-09-19

2022.6.14 submitted to journal
2022.6.15 with editor
2022.6.15 under review (After submission, a link to track the reviewer's status will be received, making it more convenient)
2022.7.27 revise (due by 9.09) (Reviewer's comments include replies to the editor)
2022.8.29 revise submit
2022.8.30 with editor
2022.9.01 under review (Learned from the reviewer tracking link: review invitations sent: 2)
2022.9.01 Review invitations accept: 1
2022.9.03 Review invitations accept: 2
2022.9.09 Review completed: 1
2022.9.10 Review completed: 2, status changed to Required reviews completed
2022.9.15 accept

Dabang250kg 2022-09-17

My feedback will be returned in 10 days. Recently, the process has been relatively slow due to the increased number of manuscripts and the time required for editors to consolidate reviewers' feedback. I suggest patiently waiting for another week and refrain from sending reminder emails hastily.

小朋友牵牵手 2022-09-17

How long did the second trial take?

舞动的风铃6345 2022-09-15

After I submitted my major revisions to the journal, both reviewers have completed their reviews. On September 11th, the status changed to "Required Reviews Completed," but it has remained the same for 4 days without any changes. Does anyone know what is happening? Is the journal planning to send it for review by new reviewers again? How long does it usually take to receive the final decision? I am thinking of sending an email if there is no change within a week.

发SCI的小白 2022-09-14

2022.7.29 Submission
2022.8.18 Minor revision

舞动的风铃6345 2022-09-14

Is there no interview or test, just direct employment? Worship the great deity.

舞动的风铃6345 2022-09-14

Are you a great god who was directly accepted without receiving any feedback for revisions after submitting your work?

祝大家虎年大吉 2022-09-13

Jan 04, 2022 Initial Date Submitted
May 01, 2022 Accept

祝大家虎年大吉 2022-09-13

Sep 12, 2022 submitted to journal
Sep 13, 2022 With Editor
Sep 15, 2022 With Editor
Sep 23, 2022 Under Review
Dec 22, 2022 Revise
Jan 11, 2023 Decision in Process
Jan 11, 2023 accept

Translation:
Sep 12, 2022 submitted to journal
Sep 13, 2022 With Editor
Sep 15, 2022 With Editor
Sep 23, 2022 Under Review
Dec 22, 2022 Revise
Jan 11, 2023 Decision in Process
Jan 11, 2023 accept

GDJ 2022-09-09

Today's issue was just published. I am planning to submit another article in January next year. Let's go for it!

tang xiaobo 2022-08-29

2022.1.24 Submission
2022.3.5 Major renovation
2022.4.4 Return for major renovation
2022.8.1 Minor repair
2022.8.21 Return for minor repair
2022.8.24 Accepted

GDJ 2022-08-29

Second one, why is it so magical?

熊黎 2022-08-22

2022.7.24 reject
2022.8.20 submitted to journal
Try again.

袋底洞的木糖醇 2022-08-18

8.12 submitted
8.15 under review
Hope for smoothness.

hustori 2022-08-15

The reviewing speed is moderate, and the reviewers' opinions are relatively professional. Personally, I believe they have been of great help to me.

John Wick 2022-08-10

It has been over four months, and it is still in the first review stage. Urgent requests for the manuscript mentioned that there is only one reviewer's opinion. The direction is underwater robotics.

Dabang250kg 2022-08-10

2022.8.5 revision (due to 9.19)
In the first review, there were three reviewers. One major revision, one minor revision, and one basically agreed to publish. It's quite amazing...
Now, OE reviews also have a question and answer section with the editors for reviewers. It seems like this started in the past two months, allowing for a more detailed understanding of the reviewers' concerns, which is great.

云深不知处 2022-08-08

2022-07-31 submitted to journal
2022-08-01 with editor

Translation: The document was submitted to the journal on July 31, 2022. On August 1, 2022, it was reviewed by the editor.

川页 2022-08-07

I don't know. The one submitted on August 1st is already under review.

GG思密达 2022-08-04

Can I add you as a friend? This contact is not convenient.

Mr_zhangxl 2022-08-02

2022.4.7 Submitted to journal
2022.4.10 With editor
2022.4.17 Under review
2022.6.6 Revise(Due by 7.20)
2022.7.15 Revise submit
2022.7.16 Under review
2022.7.22 Revise(Due by 8.4)
2022.7.31 Revise submit
2022.8.1 Accept
First review took two months, overall process took four months, major revisions in the first review, minor revisions in the second review, and the handling speed of the editor was still fast. It's gratifying that this is my first doctoral paper!

Derek Wang 2022-07-31

It took five months, successfully received, and shared the joy!

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started