袋底洞的木糖醇 2023-02-13

November, three months for review, reminded once, the editor replied that it is still under review.
On December 21st, the date was changed once.
Until now, there have been no further changes. It has already been six months. Does the first review take this long?

希望早点顺利毕业 2023-02-13

I would like to ask, as someone in the field of underwater control, which journal should I submit to if I consider OE water? The categorization of control industry in China is unreasonable. Automatica and TAC should have been classified as first-tier journals, but they are placed in the second tier and are very difficult to submit to. Several other control journals are categorized as third tier or lower, providing low value for money. Moreover, there is the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) categorization. What should I do in this situation?

JeffryFu 2023-02-11

2023.01.08 - First-instance revision completed
2023.01.22 - Second-instance reply on the first day of the new year, one reviewer has no comments, and the other reviewer has reiterated two issues from the first-instance revision that need further modification.
2023.01.26 - Second-instance revision completed
2023.02.07 - Third-instance required reviews completed
Hope the editor makes a decision quickly, and hopefully it will yield a positive outcome.

kingtonali 2023-02-11

2023.01.23 Major revision The review process was fast, but it was difficult to make changes to the comments. It belonged to the kind that could possibly be rejected, and the editor only gave 21 days.
2023.02.11 Submitted to journal Finally finished the last-minute revisions with the editor. I tried to address all the comments and wrote a total of over 7000 words. It was exhausting, but I hope it gets accepted this time.

hhuzww 2023-02-11

Waking up and becoming "under review" overnight is not bad, it's not bad at all, it satisfies.

Karen4543fdsv 2023-02-11

I am over a month old, and I also pay attention to the direction.

hhuzww 2023-02-10

Today is February 10th and it is still "With Editor". The date is still stuck on January 26th. I don't know what's going on. Has it been rejected? It hasn't even been sent for review yet...

James_bond 2023-02-10

The text in English translates to: "The decision process started without external review, but after a while, it changed to under review. After a few twists and turns, it was finally accepted with some minor revisions. Overall, the review speed is decent, but perhaps due to the high number of submissions, the editing process is average."

SCI100 2023-02-08

Fast review speed and high efficiency

hhuzww 2023-02-04

On February 4th, there is still a "with editor" status, and the time is stuck on January 26th. Does anyone know what the situation is?

zhangjiayu123 2023-02-01

Excuse me, does the host have a submission template?

zhangjiayu123 2023-02-01

Excuse me, does the original poster have a template for submission?

zhangjiayu123 2023-02-01

Do you have a Word template for submission?

hhuzww 2023-01-30

January 26th, the status has not changed, but the time has changed to January 26th.
January 30th, the status has not changed.

流体小铁蛋 2023-01-27

Thank you. It has been almost a month since the second round of revisions for the article. There were two reviewers, and one of them has already completed the review. However, the other reviewer has not yet accepted the invitation, and it seems like they may have disappeared. I wonder how the editor will handle this.

Karen4543fdsv 2023-01-26

The second trial is from December 2, 22 to January 10, 23, which is a little over a month. It also depends on the research direction.

zhangwanwei 2023-01-23

Submitted on January 20th
Status changed to "With Editor" on January 23rd
Hoping for a positive outcome!

lpaso 2023-01-17

May I ask how to determine whether the reviewer's comments suggest major revisions or something else? The feedback I received was just a questionnaire and does not contain this information.

CMXX 2023-01-15

Three reviewers, two minor revisions, one rejection. Anyone know what the outcome will be?

流体小铁蛋 2023-01-14

I would like to ask the original poster, how long does the second review process usually take?

kingtonali 2023-01-13

2023.1.13 under review

The official website acceptance rate has been updated, reaching a new high of 52%. Hopefully, this piece can be accepted soon, as several experts have helped review it.

zmx-ly 2023-01-11

How long does it usually take for the sample to be sent online?

zmx-ly 2023-01-11

May I ask how long it usually takes for the OE sample to go online?

Karen4543fdsv 2023-01-11

Record the second OE,
Received on Oct 5, 2022
Article revised
Dec 2, 2022
Article accepted for publication
Jan 10, 2023

kingtonali 2023-01-02

2023.1.01 Under review
On the first day of the new year, I went to work and submitted for external review.

kingtonali 2022-12-30

2022.12.25 Submit
2022.12.26 With editor
Until now, it has not been submitted for review. It is estimated that it is during the holiday period, and the editor is celebrating the holidays.

川页 2022-12-26

The editors always reply like this, using template phrases. They hardly read the content and mainly focus on the reviewer's comments. The comments are in questionnaire format, and the editors tend to give opportunities.

JeffryFu 2022-12-24

Nov 23 Submit
Nov 27 Under Review
Dec 02 Under Review Date Changed
Dec 21 Required Review Completed
Dec 22 Received comments from reviewers, Revise
No minor or major revisions, editor's response was brief, not sure if it is positive. Can any experienced researchers help me judge?

祝大家虎年大吉 2022-12-22

This journal does not play around. Some journals, in order to improve the displayed review period and reduce utilization rates, editors often use the strategy of rejecting and then resubmitting when revisions are required.

cfdwt 2022-12-19

The employment rates in the past five years were respectively 44.6%, 45.2%, 47.4%, 42.2%, and 45.8%. It can only be said that those who were rejected were simply not of good quality.