Verified Reviews - NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

古玉娟 2023-01-08

Does the inconsistency between the order of authors and the submission in the license to publish in the publishing agreement have any relevance?

cx7 2023-01-07

First trial took two and a half months, and then it was rejected.

abandon123 2023-01-07

How many months have you all been hired? It feels so slow!

taylor1993 2022-12-18

Generally, it takes about one week to two weeks, and it is normal to take a month if it's slower.

ycsycs 2022-12-18

2022.12.12 Submission;
2022.12.14 Reviewers Assigned
Until now, there have been no changes. Does "Reviewers Assigned" mean that the initial review has passed?

taylor1993 2022-12-17

2022.11.15 submitted
2022.11.17 editor assigned
2022.11.22 editor assigned
2022.11.29 reviewers assigned
2022.11.29 under review
2022.11.30 under review

Translation:
2022.11.15 submitted
2022.11.17 editor assigned
2022.11.22 editor assigned
2022.11.29 reviewers assigned
2022.11.29 under review
2022.11.30 under review

taylor1993 2022-12-17

I am very fortunate to be a reviewer for nonlinear dynamics.

艾纯玉 2022-12-16

It has been half a month for me too, have you got any results for yours?

起汉水之滨 2022-12-07

Is the technical editor preparing for Christmas? The article was submitted on November 30th and is still submitted to the journal.

古玉娟 2022-12-05

2022.11.30 revised submission - The revised version of the document was submitted on November 30, 2022.
2022.12.1 editor assigned - An editor was assigned to the document on December 1, 2022.
2022.12.2 under review - The document is currently being reviewed as of December 2, 2022.
2022.12.4 under review - The document is still under review as of December 4, 2022.

古玉娟 2022-12-03

2022.11.30 revised submission
2022.12.1 editor assigned
2022.12.2 under review

briareos 2022-12-01

2022-12-1 Receive

二方块儿 2022-12-01

The editing process was faster than expected and after major revisions, the paper was accepted smoothly.
17 Nov 2022 Editor Decision - Accept
18 Oct 2022 Author Revision
28 Sep 2022 Editor Decision - Major Revision
20 Jun 2022 AU - Submission Confirmation

小科研小学生 2022-11-30

Why is yours so fast? I submitted mine for the second time, and the reviewer also suggested minor revisions before acceptance. It has been two months, and it is only four days ago that it went back under review.

WX公众号“非线性动力学” 2022-11-21

Submit in early June 2022;
Send for review by the end of June;
Major revision in early September: two reviewers; over 20 questions;
Complete the revisions by mid-October;
Accepted by the end of November.

古玉娟 2022-11-17

2022.10.3 submitted
2022.10.5 editor assigned
2022.10.8 under review
2022.11.15 review completed
2022.11.15 minor revision

Translation:
2022.10.3 submitted
2022.10.5 editor assigned
2022.10.8 under review
2022.11.15 review completed
2022.11.15 minor revision

Hazel_RCIR 2022-11-11

On August 27, 2022, major revisions were made. More than 30 suggestions were made, and over 40 pages of reviewer comments were addressed. The revised manuscript was submitted on November 7, 2022, and we are looking forward to good news.

Tayyab 2022-11-05

18 April Submitted
19 April Editor assigned
26 April Under Review
14 June Reviews completed
25 June Major revisions
12 July Revision submitted
13 July Editor assigned
22 July Reviewers Assigned
23 July Under review
5 Sep Reviews completed
9 Sep Minor revision
12 Sep Revision submitted
16 Sep Editor assigned
17 Sep Under review
15 Oct Accept
31 Oct Online

Translation:

18 April - Submitted
19 April - Editor assigned
26 April - Under Review
14 June - Reviews completed
25 June - Major revisions
12 July - Revision submitted
13 July - Editor assigned
22 July - Reviewers Assigned
23 July - Under review
5 Sep - Reviews completed
9 Sep - Minor revision
12 Sep - Revision submitted
16 Sep - Editor assigned
17 Sep - Under review
15 Oct - Accept
31 Oct - Online

啊! 2022-11-05

Hello, I would like to ask how long it takes to give minor repairs after returning from a major repair?

不明白 2022-10-23

Posted on July 9th, received reviewer comments on August 24th, one reviewer provided major revision comments. After making the revisions, received second round of minor revision comments on September 28th. Accepted on October 23rd.

taylor1993 2022-10-15

Two reviewers, one suggested minor revisions, while the other reviewer directly stated poor readability, lack of experimentation and innovation, ultimately leading to rejection. There is not even an opportunity for arbitration.

杭一帆 2022-10-11

Posted on June 4, 2022, the review comments were not given until September 28, 2022. The official website stated that the review process would take around 26 days, but in reality, it took four months. The opinions of the three reviewers were divided, with one suggesting minor revisions and two suggesting major revisions and stating a lack of innovation, but none of them mentioned rejection. However, the editor-in-chief directly rejected my submission.

N1 2022-09-30

2022-01-25 submission
2022-06-10 major revision
2022-07-20 revision
2022-09-19 accept
The editing process was very timely, but the delay in time mainly occurred during the reviewer's review stage.

fafa 2022-09-29

During the PhD period, the second paper was submitted on July 15th. It underwent major revision on August 25th and was accepted on September 29th. The paper processing speed was very fast.

带着彩虹的雨 2022-09-21

May 2022, submitted at the beginning of the month, a few days later entered "under review".
From May 2022 to July 2022, it remained "under review". Sent an email inquiry, and the next day it changed to "reviewer assigned". A few days later, it entered "under review" again.
From July 2022, it remained "under review". During this period, I did not check my email.
August 23, 2022: Major revision.
September 1, 2022: Revised.
September 7, 2022: Under review.
September 20, 2022: Reviews completed.
September 21, 2022: Accepted.
Overall, Ludovico Minati, the editor, was very responsible and handled the process quickly.

nahan666 2022-09-21

2022-09-16 Reviews completed
2022-09-21 Major revision
More than 20 opinions were received, and the reviewers were very professional. I am prepared for significant revisions. Good luck to the first paper.

a1425508580 2022-09-16

2022-04-05 Submission
2022-05-31 Major revision
2022-07-01 Revised
2022-08-19 Accept after minor revision
2022-09-16 Accept

This is my first doctoral thesis. After being rejected by TAES, I resubmitted it to ND. Originally, there were two reviewers, and one of them recommended acceptance. Later, the editor added another reviewer, making a total of three reviewers. There were a total of 20 comments, which were generally professional and sincere. Overall, it was a good experience over the course of 5 months.

abcdesaa 2022-09-13

Is it OA? The decision is made after the paper is accepted!

Breezeman 2022-09-13

Is there any difference in the review and acceptance requirements for submitting to open access journals compared to regular journals? It is said that opting for open access may increase the chances of acceptance, is that true?

Sherry1 2022-09-10

2022.9.9 Feedback: Major revision. Four reviewers provided more than 20 suggestions, three of which were positive and one was negative. The editor ultimately decided on a major revision.

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started