冲冲冲冲 2021-03-17

Blessings. May you enjoy some good luck!

冲冲冲冲 2021-03-17

Your review speed is still very fast, congratulations, keep it up!

已投结果未知 2021-03-17

Blessings. May you have some good luck.

XILLV 2021-03-15

2021 3.14 decision in process... a little nervous, I always feel like it might be a rejection.

Hinton 2021-03-14

2021.02.05 submit
2021.3.8 reject
The review process was quite fast, but the editor rejected it due to insufficient innovation and the high standards of the journal. The rejection notification was given after one month and three days.
The opinions of two reviewers were included. One was more supportive and provided 20 minor suggestions. The other had a similar perspective to the editor, stating that there was a lack of innovation. Although they offered directions for improvement and provided two suggestions, the editor ultimately decided to reject it.
(I will continue to revise and improve according to the reviewers' suggestions, hoping to accumulate some luck.)

已投结果未知 2021-03-11

Every step feels like a snail, and another month has passed for the second review.

qinjisheng 2021-03-10

3.5 Under review.

只想毕业 2021-03-08

Classmate, can I have your contact information? You can add me on WeChat at 18686196389.

XILLV 2021-03-08

2021 1.19 submitted
2021 1.29 editor invited
2021 2.5 under review
2021 3.2 under review
2021 3.5 required reviews completed
Still waiting...

qinjisheng 2021-03-05

Still waiting, the situation hasn't changed, feeling anxious.

只想毕业 2021-03-04

I would like to ask, how long has your editor invitation lasted? I have been in this state for almost ten days as well.

只想毕业 2021-03-02

Hello, I would like to ask, has your situation changed? I have been in this state for a long time too.

Victor 2021-03-01

Did you mention in your submission that you have previously submitted to other journals, so the review process was faster?

Yunliang Qi 2021-02-21

Received at Editorial Office: 15 Mar 2020
Article revised: 19 Oct 2020
Article accepted for publication: 29 Jan 2021

michelle2021 2021-02-19

2020.07.12 submit - Submitted on July 12, 2020
2020.11.1 大修 - Major revision on November 1, 2020
2020.11.30 revised submit - Revised submission on November 30, 2020
2021.01.03 accept with minor revision - Accepted with minor revisions on January 3, 2021
2021.01.16 revised submit - Revised submission on January 16, 2021
2021.02.15 accept - Accepted on February 15, 2021
The time of the above message is slightly incorrect.

michelle2021 2021-02-19

2020.07.12 submit - Submitted on July 12, 2020
2020.11.1 大修 - Major revision on November 1, 2020
2020.11.30 revised submit - Revised submission on November 30, 2020
2020.01.03 accept with minor revision - Accepted with minor revisions on January 3, 2020
2020.01.16 revised submit - Revised submission on January 16, 2020
2020.02.15 accept - Accepted on February 15, 2020
历时7个月 - Took 7 months

zzjjjjzz 2021-02-18

The reviewer is a junior colleague who raises very targeted questions, which are very helpful for improving the overall quality of the article.
June 9, 2020 - Submitted
October 6, 2020 - Major revision after the first review
November 16, 2020 - Returned for modification
February 2, 2021 - Accepted

qinjisheng 2021-02-17

1.26 Delivered
1.29 Editor Invited
2.17 Editor Invited

Continue to wait, probably because it's Chinese New Year, and the editors are busy celebrating.

ctokyo 2021-02-10

2020-03-07: Submit paper
2020-05-10: First major revision/resubmission
2020-06-21: Submit revision
2020-11-08: Second major revision/resubmission
2020-12-16: Submit revision
2021-02-10: Accept

Liushuang Max 2021-02-05

Excuse me, did the author update the status of "Required Reviews Completed"? I noticed that several people are in the same situation. I have also been in this state for a long time.

哈哈哈木木哦 2021-01-27

It is possible that all n reviewers agree to review at the same time, but the AE (Associate Editor) sets the resolution to be made once 2 reviewers have responded. At this point, when 2 reviewers have responded, it becomes "review completed". However, the general principle is to follow the full clearance principle, where the editor will wait for all reviewers who agree to review to respond before making a decision. As a result, after the first occurrence of the "review completed" status, the date of "review completed" will change each time a new reviewer submits comments.

已投结果未知 2021-01-24

2020.12.16 required reviews completed and it has been 40 days until now, still no news (changed once on 2020.12.29). Please reply using the email template. It's too slow, be cautious before investing.

winnerche 2021-01-22

Three reviewers, one minor revision, one direct rejection, one major revision, and the editor directly rejected it.

Jeremy_lee 2021-01-17

The state that entered in two months.

Jeremy_lee 2021-01-17

I am also in the process of second review, the results have not been released yet. Have the results for the friend on the 13th come out?

已投结果未知 2021-01-15

So scary, it has been more than 4 months since my first review and there is still no result. It makes me want to withdraw my submission.

Yueming Yin 2021-01-13

What is the result of the second trial later? My second trial also took 7 months, and now it is "decision in process".

Yueming Yin 2021-01-13

My second review started 7 months ago and is now in the "decision in process" stage. Today is the third day, and I am unsure of the outcome. The first review required major revisions.

hituestc 2021-01-12

May I ask how long it took for you to reach this state in the second review?

已投结果未知 2021-01-11

I have reminded twice, and each time I received a template reply from the journal manager. I feel it has no effect.