小电博 2021-03-20

The manuscript was submitted in the morning, and in the afternoon, I received a phone call from the editor-in-chief. The editor-in-chief was very polite and said that the quality of my article was very high and met their expectations. However, they were surprised by the tremendous amount of work I had done and suggested that I divide it into three parts and serialize it in three cover articles. They said that this would help their journal's impact factor increase by 60 this year. I politely declined, stating that it was a small-scale plan, as I could easily complete five articles of this workload in a month.

OneRzzZ 2021-03-19

The direction is molecular dynamics simulation of the Big Bang. Just as I started working on it, the editor called and said that the layout has already been reserved and the manuscript has been accepted. Truly worthy of being a top-tier journal!

小小牛-2 2021-03-19

3.1 Submission
3.1 with editor
3.2 under review
3.18 accepted

小小牛-2 2021-03-19

The first time I submitted to Nature, I was rejected in the previous four attempts. After reading the comments, everyone said that this journal is relatively good. With a trial attitude, I decided to give it a try and submitted again. Recently, I just received the acceptance notification, it was accepted directly! I think everyone should give it a try!

duffy 2021-03-16

Quite fast, submitted in the morning, invited for publication in the afternoon, published in the evening, and promoted to professor within the next day. Currently, still unable to accept this fact.

天蓝色 2021-03-16

incroyable

程序员 2021-03-11

The text translates to: "In August 1985, when I was studying for my Ph.D., I submitted the research paper titled 'A study on the method and theoretical model to achieve a yield of one million kilograms per mu of wheat.' After more than 30 years of 287 major revisions and 402 minor revisions, it was finally accepted before my retirement in 2021. I am so happy!"

笑到最后 2021-03-10

This is my 10th paper in Nature, which is very well-received. The reviewer used only the word "amazing" to describe my paper.

fanch10@126.com 2021-03-03

Well said, it does make sense.

newsnews 2021-02-06

How did "submitting to multiple journals" become a moral issue when it is clearly an oppressive clause imposed by the editorial department? Why is it not considered a moral issue to apply to multiple schools for admission?
The editor made a wrong decision, and so did the chief editor, but we must adhere to the original judgment, as is customary in international journals. Which of these moral issues is more serious, the one regarding the editorial department or the one regarding "submitting to multiple journals"? Should the academic community intervene in the moral issues of the editorial department?
The initial review process of the editorial department is a flawed system, and the instant rejection is based on the level of the author's affiliation.
Science is about questioning, yet some journals openly declare in their submission guidelines that they will not review challenges to widely accepted theories, citing reasons such as it being too time-consuming. What is the purpose of your journal? Can it only sing praises? ScienceNature refers such articles to specialized journals, but specialized journals and ScienceNature have a similar taste.
Truly innovative articles are not dared to be reviewed by specialized journals, from ScienceNatureCell to specialized journals. The mindset of top journals is directly inherited by specialized journals.
You can instantly reject a perpetual motion machine manuscript because you understand thermodynamics. But you are not qualified to instantly reject a manuscript questioning relativity theory based on our collective belief in relativity theory. Because you do not understand relativity theory. Rejection needs to be made by someone who understands relativity theory, in order to make the author accept it. (There was a similar debate online recently)

不完美的上帝 2021-02-04

Already hired directly, the editor saw that I'm handsome and asked if I have a girlfriend. I have a lovely daughter at home, but unfortunately...

JRfanJAMES 2021-01-07

I am a loser from an ordinary third-tier university. I study leaf surface fertilization and originally wanted to submit my research to the Journal of Hunan Agricultural Sciences. Unfortunately, it was rejected. Later, I translated it into English and submitted it to Nature. Unexpectedly, three experts provided excellent revision suggestions and accepted it after I made the changes. I was awarded a reward of 1 million yuan by the university and was also given the title of associate professor. The editor even kept calling me for more submissions. Now, I really don't know what to do. I am truly just an academic underachiever.