Verified Reviews - MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.

didilala 2021-09-10

The major revision has been submitted for nearly 5 months, and there is still no assigned editor. Incredible!

VV 2021-09-06

It has been eight months under review, and the last state change was on August 24th. Should I send a reminder letter?

hayden 2021-09-05

I have been revising for more than three months for the second review. I have sent reminder emails 7-8 times, but the chief editor has not replied to any of them. There is no efficiency at all.

chaos and fractals 2021-08-31

The first review took 3 months, and the reviewers were quite professional, asking good questions. As I added experiments, it took about a month to revise the content of the article, which significantly increased. I submitted the revised draft on June 14th, and now it has been almost 3 months since September 1st. I wonder how everyone is doing?

xilei2014 2021-08-23

Excuse me, have you been able to retrieve it? Approximately how long did it take to retrieve it?

xilei2014 2021-08-23

The translation of the text into English is as follows: "The luck is quite good, and the manuscript review is quite fast. The current status is online, but I don't know how long it will take to retrieve."

超超的科研 2021-08-23

Posted on April 14, 2021
Major revision on May 14, 2021
Resubmitted on June 16, 2021
Accepted on August 2, 2021!
I'm quite lucky as my paper was reviewed and revised quickly. The reviewers' comments were also quite positive, with many explanatory suggestions that were easy to address. Finally, it got accepted.

Lee558 2021-08-19

Submitted at the end of November 2020, underwent major revisions in March 2021, returned that month, and has been assigned to an editor since then. I have sent several reminder emails, but only received template replies stating that the editor is still in the queue for processing. No progress has been made so far.

老101 2021-07-27

Posted on March 2, 2021, entered external review on April 26, received the first feedback on June 8, updated status on June 20 but still received feedback, minor revisions on July 1, revised on July 11, accepted on July 26.
It may be because it involves applied theory and has sufficient experimental evidence, so the process was relatively fast. It could also be because I was lucky and the reviewers were more lenient, allowing for minor revisions. At least it can still be considered for CCF-C.

xiaolaodi 2021-07-19

Hello, may I ask if there is always a reply when I send reminders to the email for "contact me"?

wq8250 2021-06-29

Hello, may I ask how often can I search after being hired?

wq8250 2021-06-29

Update on progress
After major renovations, the second review has ended and direct employment has been granted. The whole process took nearly a year.

suldier 2021-06-25

May I ask how to view such detailed time records?

JieNi_HNU 2021-06-24

This journal is probably going to deteriorate. Everyone should be cautious when submitting manuscripts.
Considering that it is still a CCF C-class journal, I submitted once, but it was extremely slow.
I submitted in early May 2019, and the status has been "under review" all along.
It wasn't until early January 2020 that I received the initial review result. They requested major revisions. There were a total of four reviewers, but their comments were not very helpful. It was mainly because they didn't understand the paper and asked me to cite their own papers. I wrote a 9-page response.
Fortunately, there weren't any issues in the second review, and the process was fast.
I received the acceptance in early February 2020.

The professors in our department advised us not to touch this journal.
Wishing everyone smooth progress in their scientific research.

地球上的小xx 2021-06-22

I want to ask how you contacted the editor. I sent an email but didn't even receive a template reply.

地球上的小xx 2021-06-22

It has been four months and still no news. I am a little anxious and would like to ask everyone why I haven't received a reply to my email. Could you please let me know the specific email address of the editorial department and the editor? I want to send a follow-up reminder.

lmmmmmm 2021-04-09

Just send it to the email address of the editorial department.

福海畅游人 2021-04-08

Is it possible to click "contact me" in the submission system's menu bar and send an email directly? Because I don't know which editor my article has been assigned to.

lmmmmmm 2021-04-08

Send a few more emails to remind them, usually it takes several reminders for the editorial department to pay attention to your submission. Otherwise, they will just reply with a template response.

福海畅游人 2021-04-08

Why is your first trial so fast? It has been four months for me and I still haven't received the result of the first trial...

lmmmmmm 2021-04-07

2020.10.20 Submitted
2020.10.21 Editor Assigned
2020.10.30 Under Review
2020.11.04 Reviews Completed
2020.11.07 Reviews Completed
2020.11.16 Reviews Completed
2020.12.05 Reviews Completed
2020.12.08 Major Revision
2020.12.22 Revision Submitted
2020.12.23 Editor Assigned
2021.03.14 Under Review
2021.03.29 Reviews Completed
2021.04.04 Reviews Completed
2021.04.06 Accept

Invited 7 reviewers and received opinions from 5 reviewers. The first review was relatively fast, but the second review was slow. Wishing everyone a smooth submission process and early acceptance!

zxcqwer 2021-03-30

The first review was completed after over two months, with countless reminders in between. It has been over a month since the second review was completed, but despite several reminders, no results have been given. I really don't know what these editors are doing all day. They claim to be busy academic experts, so if they are so busy, why do they still hold these positions? Deliberately delaying the author's time is indirectly harming people, isn't it?

学术圈菜鸟 2021-03-30

After I submitted my major revision, I waited for three months without any news. After urging them to review it, they sent it for evaluation on the third day. It turns out that urging is indeed effective; this journal is indeed a bit too slow.

Hinton 2021-03-30

Super slow!! 1
It has been 6 months already, four months for review, two months for review completed, and still no result for the first review. I can't understand why it takes so long after the review has been completed for two months. I have sent three reminders in between, but all I received were template replies. It's a painful lesson, the speed is too slow, be cautious when submitting.

学术圈菜鸟 2021-03-28

"Reminder for submission, but no one responded."

学术圈菜鸟 2021-03-28

First revision, it has been 3 months since the revision, but the status hasn't changed. It has been "Editor Assigned" all along. I didn't remember this journal being so slow when I submitted. It has been half a year altogether. Sigh.

zxcqwer 2021-03-25

It has been three months since I sent it back to the editor for revision. It seems like it's the same situation for all of them. We can't stop urging for the manuscript. Now, we need to remind them once a week.

昵称无效 2021-03-24

The first review was completed after more than two months! After making major revisions and resubmitting, it only took a few days for the status to change to "reviews completed." When I asked the editorial assistant, they said all the comments had been addressed and the review process was finished. However, it has been over a month since then and still no results have been given. This is really impressive!

hua_938 2021-03-24

The second review has passed for over two months, and I am still assigned to an editor. The first review has been going on for 10 months now.

David! 2021-03-23

Journals in the field of multimedia information processing are considered mainstream journals, with longer publication cycles. The reviewers are quite professional and their questions are not too biased.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started